1887
24th International Geophysical Conference and Exhibition – Geophysics and Geology Together for Discovery
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

We present a cooperative inversion approach for acoustic impedance using seismic and magnetotelluric data. In this approach, the magnetotelluric data, sensitive to the resistivity of rocks are used to get the large scale background spatial trends of the acoustic impedance model, while the seismic data are used to get the small-scale features. The connections between resistivity and elastic properties of rocks are obtained from petrophysical relationships derived from borehole data. Structural constraints derived from seismic are used to improve the magnetotelluric inversion. We present an application of this technique to synthetic data derived from previous interpretation of seismic and magnetotelluric models in a mineral province. The synthetic example shows how an improved result is obtained using our cooperative inversion workflow.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab236
2015-12-01
2026-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Colombo, D., M.Mantovani, S.Hallinan, and M.Virgilio, 2008, Sub-basalt depth imaging using simultaneous joint inversion of seismic and electromagnetic (MT) data: a CRB field study: SEG Expanded Abstracts, 2674-2678.
  2. Constable, S. C., R. L. Parker, and C. G. Constable, 1987, Occam’s inversion: a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from em sounding data: Geophysics, 52, 289-300.
  3. De Stefano, M., F. G. Andreasi, S. Re, M. Virgilio, and F. F. Snyder, 2011, Multiple-domain, simultaneous joint inversion of geophysical data with application to subsalt imaging: Geophysics, 76, R69-R80.
  4. Gallardo, L. A., and M. A. Meju, 2004, Joint two-dimensional dc resistivity and seismic travel time inversion with cross-gradients constraints: Journal of Geophysical Research, 109, B3, B03311.
  5. Eck, N.C., 2010, The Effects of contact metamorphism on the host rocks for Carlin-type mineralization at the Getchell Development, Nevada, USA. Master’s thesis, University of Nevada, Las Vegas.
  6. Gao, G., A. Abubakar, and T. Habashy, 2012, Joint petrophysical inversion of electromagnetic and full-waveform seismic data: Geophysics, 77, WA3-WA18.
  7. Gomez, C. T., T. Mukerji, and G. Mavko, 2009, Seismic Inversion using Low-Frequency Seismic Impedance trend computed from CSEM data: SEG Expanded Abstracts, 24122416.
  8. Jing, C., J. J. Carazzone, C. DiCaprio, G. Leahy, A. A. Mullur, R. L. Saltzer, J. Schmedes, and V. P. Singh, 2011, A hybrid joint-inversion scheme: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 527, 2689-2693.
  9. Meju, M. A., L. A. Gallardo, and A. K. Mohamed, 2003, Evidence for correlation of electrical resistivity and seismic velocity in heterogeneous near-surface materials: Geophysical Research Letters, 30.
  10. Russell, B., and D. Hampson, 1991, A comparison of post-stack seismic inversion methods: SEG Expanded Abstracts, 876-878.
  11. Takam-Takougang, E. M., B. Harris, and A. Kepic, 2014a, Cooperative inversion of seismic and magnetotelluric data in complex areas: A workflow: SEG Expanded Abstracts, 31843189.
  12. Takam-Takougang, E. M., B. Harris, and A. Kepic, 2014b, Cooperative inversion of seismic and magnetotelluric data: Application in mineral province: Geophysics, in review.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2015ab236
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Cooperative; Inversion; magnetotelluric; mineral; seismic
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error