1887
25th International Conference and Exhibition – Interpreting the Past, Discovering the Future
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Geophysical joint inversions seek to exploit the statistical fact that a model that simultaneously satisfies two or more independent data sets is more likely to represent geological ‘reality’ than a model that only satisfies a single data set. Interpreting geophysical data directly rapidly exceeds the capacity of a human as more data are added, so some form of machine assistance is usually required. Conventional inversion techniques can produce a ‘best fit’ model but this might only be one of a large range of possible models that fit the data. Bayesian inference provides a tool to evaluate the relative probability of possible geological models in a given set, thereby quantifying the amount of information the data is actually providing.

Over 2012-2014, National ICT Australia (NICTA; now Data 61) worked with a number of university, government and industry partners, with support from the Australian Renewable Energy Agency, to build a Bayesian inference software tool for geophysical joint inversions. The tool was initially directed at geothermal energy exploration but is equally applicable to investigating other geological problems. For one geothermal exploration problem, Bayesian inference allowed us to jointly invert gravity, magnetics, magnetotelluric soundings and borehole temperature records to map in three dimensions the probability of encountering granite >270°C beneath the Moomba region of South Australia. The results correlated well with an independent deterministic inversion carried out by Geoscience Australia, but provided a much richer interpretation in probability space.

NICTA released the software tools as open source code on the GitHib platform.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2016ab131
2016-12-01
2026-01-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Afonso, J.C., Fullea J., Yang, Y., Connolly, J.A.D. and Jones, A.G., 2013, 3D multi-observable probabilistic inversion for the compositional and thermal structure of the lithosphere and upper mantle II: General methodology and resolution analysis: Journal of Geophysical Research, DOI:10.1002/jgrb.50123.
  2. Arendt, C.A., Aciego, S.M. and Hetland, E.A., 2015, An open source Bayesian Monte Carlo isotope mixing model with applications in Earth surface processes: Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 16, 1274-1292. DOI:10.1002/2014GC005683.
  3. Beardsmore, G., 2004, The influence of basement on surface heat flow in the Cooper Basin: Exploration Geophysics, 35, 223-235.
  4. Bodin, T., Salmon, M., Kennett, B.L.N. and Sambridge, M., 2012, Probabilistic surface reconstruction from multiple data sets: An example for the Australian Moho: Journal of Geophysical Research, 117, B10307. DOI:10.1029/2012JB009547.
  5. Gallagher, K., 2012, Transdimensional inverse thermal history modeling for quantitative thermochronology: Journal of Geophysical Research, 117, B02408. DOI:10.1029/2011JB008825.
  6. Iaffaldano, G., Hawkins, R. and Sambridge, M., 2014, Bayesian noise-reduction in Arabia/Somalia and Nubia/Arabia finite rotations since ~20 Ma: Implications for Nubia/Somalia relative motion: Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems, 15, 845-854.
  7. DOI:10.1002/2013GC005089.
  8. Meixner, T. and Holgate, F., 2009, The Cooper Basin Region 3D Geological Map Version 1: A search for hot buried granites: Geoscience Australia, Record 2009/15. 14pp.
  9. Murray, J.R., Minson, S.E. and Svarc, J.L., 2014, Slip rates and spatially variable creep on faults of the northern San Andreas system inferred through Bayesian inversion of Global Positioning System data: Journal of Geophysical Research, Solid Earth, 119, 60236047. DOI:10.1002/2014JB010966.
  10. Young, M.K., Cayley, R.A., McLean, M.A., Rawlinson, N., Arroucau, P. and Salmon, M., 2013, Crustal structure of the east Gondwana margin in southeast Australia revealed by transdimensional ambient seismic noise tomography: Geophysical Research Letters, 40, 4266-4271. DOI:10.1002/grl.50878.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2016ab131
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error