1887
25th International Conference and Exhibition – Interpreting the Past, Discovering the Future
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Full tensor gradient (FTG) data is highly useful in hydrocarbon exploration and the detection of some geological targets with small size as its higher detailed information abundance and finer resolution. At the same time, there are some high-frequency Gaussian white noise mixed in the target signal and which has closer frequency range than the conventional gravity data. Thus, one key step before inversion is to remove as much Gaussian white noise as possible and reserve the subtle details. For this pre-processing step, several effective methods have been used, including low-pass filters, least square fitting methods based on Laplace equation and wavelet filtering methods. In this paper, we would utilize the translation invariant wavelet for the reason that it can suppress Gaussian white noise through multi-resolution analysis and at the same time can avoid pseudo-Gibbs phenomenon. The other point different from wavelet method used before is that we applied a mixed threshold constructed according to the curve of both soft threshold and hard threshold. Compared to soft and hard threshold, mixed threshold can keep more details and remove more noise respectively in terms of the energy distribution of signal and noise. Then we process wavelet coefficients with mixed threshold and do inverse transform to recover the data. The results demonstrate that translation invariant wavelet can not only remove the major part of Gaussian white noise, but also reserves high-frequency detailed information of FTG data. Obviously, translation invariant wavelet with mixed thresholding has preferable application effect in filtering FTG data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2016ab138
2016-12-01
2026-01-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barnes, G., and John L., 2011, Processing gravity gradient data: Geophysics, 76, I33-I47.
  2. Coifman R. R., and Donoho, D. L., 1995, Wavelets and Statistics, chapter, Translation-invariant de-noising: New York: Springer-Verlag, 103, 125-150.
  3. Donoho D. L., 1995, De-Noising by Soft-Thresholding: IEEE transactions on information theory, 41, 613-627.
  4. Donoho D. L., and Johnstone I. M., 1994, Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage: Biometrika, 81, 425-155.
  5. Julio C. S., Luis T., and Yaoguo L., 2003, Efficient automatic denoising of gravity gradiometry data: Geophysics, 69, 772-782.
  6. Misac N., 1984, Toward a three-dimensional automatic interpretation of potential field data via generalized Hilbert transforms: Fundamental relations: Geophysics, 49, 780-786.
  7. Sanchez, V., David S., Yaoguo L., Misac N., David W., and David S., 2005, Processing and inversion of magnetic gradient tensor data for UXO applications: 18th EEGS Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, 1193-1202.
  8. Yuan, Y., Da-Nian H., Qing-Lu Y., and Mei-Xia G., 2013, Noise filtering of full-gravity gradient tensor data: Applied Geophysics, 10, 241-250.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2016ab138
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): filter; full tensor gradient; mixed thresholding; translation invariant wavelet
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error