1887
25th International Conference and Exhibition – Interpreting the Past, Discovering the Future
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Coal quality information such as ash content, density, volatile matter and specific energy are important to the coal mining industry for mine planning, design, extraction, beneficiation and utilisation. These parameters are traditionally obtained through laboratory analyses conducted on drill-core samples from exploration drill holes. This process is expensive and time consuming. In this paper, we use a multi-variable data analysis algorithm based on the Radial Basis Function (RBF) neural network methods to estimate coal quality parameters from routinely-acquired multiple geophysical logs such as density, gamma ray and sonic logs. The performance of this RBF-based approach was demonstrated using both self-controlled training data sets and an independent data set from a mine. It was observed that although the density logs play a key role in coal parameter estimation, the use of multiple types of geophysical logs, including logs with different resolutions such as short spaced density log DENB and long spaced density log DENL, improves the estimation accuracy. It is therefore expected that the use of additional geophysical logs such as photoelectric factor (PEF), SIROLOG and PGNAA, which provide data of geochemical constituents, should improve estimates of coal quality parameters.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2016ab139
2016-12-01
2026-01-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Billings, S.D., Beatson, R.K., and Newsamn, G.N., 2002a, Interpolation of geophysical data using continuous global surfaces: Geophysics, 67, 1810-1822.
  2. Billings, S.D., Newsamn, G.N., and Beatson, R.K., 2002b, Smooth fitting of geophysical data using continuous global surfaces: Geophysics, 67, 1823-1834.Bond, L. O., Alger, R. P. and Schmidt, A. W., 1971, Well log applications in coal mining and rock mechanics: Transactions of SME, December, Vol. 250, pp. 355-362.
  3. Borsaru, M., Millitz, P. and Ceravolo, C., 1992, Comparison between the neutron-gamma and gamma-gamma techniques for ash prediction in 140 mm diameter quality control holes at the Callide Mine: Nucl. Geophys., Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 125-132.
  4. Daniels, J. J., Scott, J. H. and Liu, J., 1983, Estimation of coal quality parameters from geophysical well logs: Transactions of the SPWLA 24th Annual logging Symposium, Vol. 2, pp. 1-19.
  5. Fishel, K. W. and Mayer, R. 1979, Extremely high resolution density coal logging techniques: In Coal Exploration, Edited by George O. Argall, Jr., Proceedings of the 2nd International Coal Exploration Symposium, Denver, October 1978, pp. 490-504.
  6. Edwards, K. W. and Banks, K. M., 1978, A theoretical approach to the evaluation of in-situ coal: Can. Mining Metall. Bull., Vol. 71, No. 792, pp. 124-131.
  7. Groves, B. and Bowen, E. 1981, The application of geophysical borehole logging to coal exploration: J. of Coal Geology Group of the Geological Society of Australia, Volume 3, Part 1, pp. 51-59
  8. McCracken, K. G. and Mathew, P. J., 1981: Bolt-hole and borehole core logging instrumentation: J. of Coal Geology Group of the Geological Society of Australia, Volume 3, Part 1, pp. 31-36.
  9. Mongillo, M., 2011, Choosing basis functions and shape parameters for radial basis function methods: SIAM.
  10. Mullen, M. J., 1988, Log evaluation in wells drilled for coalbed methane: Geology and Coalbed Methane Resources of the Northern San Juan Basin, Colorado and New Mexico Guidebook, Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists, pp. 113-124.
  11. Mullen, M. J., 1989, Coalbed methane resource evaluation from wireline logs in the Northeastern San Juan Basin. A case study: Proc. SPE Joint Rocky Mountain Reg Low Permeability Reservoir Symposium and Exhibition Proceedings: SPE Joint Rocky Mountain Regional/Low Permeability Reservoirs Symposium and Exhibition, March 6-8, 1989, Denver, CO, USA.
  12. Nichols, W., 2000, Application of the SIROLOG downhole geophysical tool at Callide coalfields - Eastern Central Queensland: Proceedings of the 4th International Mining Geology Conference, 14-17 May 2000, Coolum, Queensland.
  13. Orr, M.J.L., 1996, Introduction to Radial Basis Function Networks: Technical report, Institute for Adaptive and Neural Computation, Division of Informatics, Edinburgh University, www.cc.gatech.edu/~isbell/tutorials/rbf-intro.pdf accessed 15/08/2015.
  14. Renwick, R.I., 1980, The uses and benefits of down hole geophysical logging in coal exploration programs: J. of Coal Geology Group of the Geological Society of Australia, Volume 3, Part 1, pp. 37-50.
  15. Russell, B.H., Lines, L.R., and Hampson, D.P., 2003, Application of the radial basis function neural network to the prediction of log properties from seismic attributes: Exploration Geophysics, 34, 15-23.
  16. Sarle, W.S., 1994, Neural Networks and Statistical Models: In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference, Cary, NC, 1538-1550.
  17. Till, V. S., 1985, Quantitative estimation of coal parameters from geophysical logs: End of Grant Report No. 529, Commonwealth of Australia National Energy Research, Development and Demonstration Program, NERDDP/EG/86/529, 106 pp.
  18. Till, V.S., 1987, Coal quality from geophysical logs; methods and ideas: Proceedings of 21st Newcastle symposium on Advances in the study of the Sydney Basin, Engel, B. A. E. (convener). Vol. 21, 149-157, April 10-12, 1987.
  19. Zhou, B. and Esterle, J., 2008, Toward improved coal density estimation from geophysical logs: Exploration Geophysics, Vol. 39, No. 2, 124-132.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2016ab139
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): ash content; Coal quality; geophysical logs; Radial Basis Function (RBF)
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error