1887
25th International Conference and Exhibition – Interpreting the Past, Discovering the Future
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Total organic carbon (TOC) is directly associated with total porosity and gas content and is a critical factor in assessing the potential of unconventional reservoirs. TOC content is only known at the depths where the laboratory measurements on recovered core samples are performed. However, reliable estimation of potential resources can only be based on information about vertical and lateral distribution of organic matter throughout the prospective gas shale reservoir. This information is commonly obtained from conventional wireline logs, such as gamma ray, density, transit time and resistivity. Due to the complexity of unconventional reservoirs, traditional methods based on distinct differences of resistivity, density and sonic velocity of organic matter from those of the inorganic matrix are not always successful. We investigate the best way to predict the TOC using gamma-ray, density, porosity, resistivity and sonic transit time log responses by applying machine learning methods such as Artificial Neural Network (ANN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). The analysis is done on the data from seven wells drilled through onshore unconventional reservoirs in the McArthur Basin (Northern Territory) and Georgina Basin (Northern Territory and Queensland), Australia. The prediction quality of traditional, multiple liner regression (MLR) and machine learning methods was compared. The most accurate TOC estimates were generated by ANN- and SVM-based nonlinear predictors, followed by the MLR and traditional models. This indicates that geologic complexity affects the relationship between the log response and TOC in the area of interest.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2016ab164
2016-12-01
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bishop, M., 2003, Neural networks for pattern recognition: University Press, Oxford.
  2. Dellenbach, J., Espitalie, J. and Lebreton, F., 1983, Source rock logging: Transactions of the Eighth European Symposium, SPWLA, paper D.
  3. Kohonen, T., 2001, Self-Organizing Maps: Springer: Berlin.
  4. Liu, Y., Chen, Z., Hu, K. and Liu, C., 2013, Quantifying total organic carbon from well logs using support vector regression. GeoConvention, Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists.
  5. Passey, Q. R., Bohacs, K., Esch, W. L., Klimentidis, R. and Sinha, S., 2010, From oil-prone source rock to gas-producing shale reservoir - geologic and petrophysical characterization of unconventional shale gas reservoirs: International Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, SPE.
  6. Schmoker, J. W., 1979, Determination of organic content of Appalachian Devonian shales from gamma-ray logs: AAPG Bulletin, 63(9), 1504-1537.
  7. Passey, Q. R., Creaney, S., Kulls, J. B., Moretti, F. J. and Stroud, J. D., 1990, A practical model for organic richness from porosity and resistivity logs: AAPG Bulletin, 74(12), 1777-1794.
  8. Tan, M., Song, X., Yang, X. and Q. Wu, Q., 2015, Support-vector-regression machine technology for total organic carbon content prediction from wireline logs in organic shale: A comparative study: Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 26, 792-802.
  9. Vapnik, V. [1998] Statistical learning theory: Wiley.
  10. Yan, F. and Han, D.-H., 2013, Measurement of elastic properties of kerogen: 83rd Annual International Meeting, SEG, Expanded Abstracts, 2778-2782.
  11. Zhu, Y., Martinez, A., Liu, E., Harris, C., Xu, S., Payne, M. A. and Terrell M., 2010, Understanding geophysical responses of shale gas plays: Shale Workshop, EAGE.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2016ab164
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): ANN; regression; SVM; TOC; unconventional gas reservoir
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error