1887
25th International Conference and Exhibition – Interpreting the Past, Discovering the Future
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Airborne gravity tensor (or gravity gradient) surveying is one of the newest techniques for geophysical exploration. The rise in the acquisition of this data type is partially due to the fact that these data provide much more complete, extensive and higher resolution information of rock density distribution than conventional land gravity data. This has positioned Airborne Gravity Gradient (AGG) surveys among the geophysical services requested by mining companies, alongside aeromagnetic and radiometric surveys. The use of these data has been primarily to support geological mapping given the limited access to commercial software for quantitative depth interpretation. In particular, there has been a scarce development of AGG data inversion software, which has limited our understanding of the significance of these data for resolving three-dimensional subsurface targets. In this work we hypothesize that AGG data can provide more detailed information of the multidirectional variations of subsurface density. To prove this hypothesis, we developed conjugate gradient AGG-data inversion software for three-dimensional targets. This software was applied to synthetic data generated by several test assemblages of three-dimensional bodies and used to perform a Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) sensitive analysis to explore the actual resolution power of the different tensor data components and whether they are indeed superior to the conventional vertical gravity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2016ab180
2016-12-01
2026-01-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Banerjee, B., & S. P. D. Gupta 1977. Gravitational attraction of a rectangular parallelepiped, Geophysics, 42(5), 1053-1055.
  2. Cevallos, C., P. Kovac, & S. Lowe 2013. Application of curvatures to airborne gravity gradient data in oil exploration, Geophysics, 78(4), G81-G88.
  3. DiFrancesco, D., A. Grierson, D. Kaputa, & T. Meyer 2009. Gravity gradiometer systems - advances and challenges, Geophys. Prospect., 57(4), 615-623.
  4. Dransfield, M. 2007. Airboren Gravity Gradiometry in the Search for Mineral Deposits, paper presented at Proceedings of Exploration 07: Fifth Decennial International Conference on Mineral Exploration.
  5. Dransfield, M., & J. B. Lee 2004. The FALCON® airborne gravity gradiometer survey systems, in R.J.L. Lane, Editor, Airborne Gravity 2004 - Abstracts from the ASEG-PESA Airborne Gravity 2004 Workshop: Geoscience Australia Record 2004/18, 7-14.
  6. Dransfield, M., & Y. Zeng 2009. Airborne gravity gradiometry: Terrain corrections and elevation error, Geophysics, 74(5), I37-I42.
  7. Geng, M., D. Huang, Q. Yang, & Y. Liu 2014. 3D inversion of airborne gravity-gradiometry data using cokriging, Geophysics, 79(4), G37-G47.
  8. Jekeli, C. 1993. A review of gravity gradiometer survey system data analyses, Geophysics, 58(4), 508-514, doi:doi:10.1190/1.1443433.
  9. Jekeli, C. 2004. High-resolution gravity mapping: the next generation of sensors, in State of the Planet: Frontiers and Challenges in Geophysics, edited by R. S. J. H. C. J. Sparks, pp. 135-146.
  10. Jekeli, C. 2006. Airborne gradiometry error analysis, Surv. Geophys., 27(2), 257-275.
  11. Martin, R., V. Monteiller, D. Komatitsch, S. Perrouty, M. Jessell, S. Bonvalot, & M. Lindsay 2013. Gravity inversion using wavelet-based compression on parallel hybrid CPU/GPU systems: application to southwest Ghana, Geophys. J. Int., 195(3), 1594-1619.
  12. Moorkamp, M., M. Jegen, A. Roberts, & R. Hobbs 2011. Massively parallel forward modeling of scalar and tensor gravimetry data, Comput. Geosci., 36(5).
  13. Murphy, C. A. 2004. The Air-FTGTM airborne gravity gradiometer system, edited, in R.J.L. Lane, Editor, Airborne Gravity 2004 -Abstracts from the ASEG-PESA Airborne Gravity 2004 Workshop: Geoscience Australia Record 2004/18, 7-14.
  14. Nabighian, M. N., M. E. Ander, V. J. S. Grauch, R. O. Hansen, T. R. LaFehr, Y. Li, W. C. Pearson, J. W. Peirce, J. D. Phillips, & M.
  15. E. Ruder 2005. 75th Anniversary - Historical development of the gravity method in exploration, Geophysics, 70(6), 63ND-89ND.
  16. Nabighian, M. N., & M. W. Asten 2002. Metalliferous mining geophysics - State of the art in the last decade of the 20th century and the beginning of the new millennium, Geophysics, 67(3).
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2016ab180
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): CG AGG; Conjunctive Gradient; Gravity Gradient (GG); SVD
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error