1887
25th International Conference and Exhibition – Interpreting the Past, Discovering the Future
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

We invert seven densely sampled magnetotelluric transects at the Kevitsa Ni-Cu-PGE (platinum group elements) deposit in Finland. The geology at the deposit presents at least two high electrical conductivity rock types within a resistive host. We consider the extent to which highly conductive phyllite and an ore zone can be separated through inversion of magnetotelluric data. Multiple inversions were completed with 312 magnetotelluric (MT) stations. It was possible to generate a three-dimensional conductivity volume from the 2D MT derived conductivities sections via volumetric interpolation. We compare the resulting 3D conductivity volume with co-located 2D and 3D seismic data. Comparisons show that an impression of the Ni-Cu-PGE ore-body could be observed in both seismic reflection and conductivity volumes. We discuss methods for constraining MT inversions and the impact they may have in separating proximal but highly conductive units. The inversions were complete as a precursor to full 3D cooperative inversion of the seismic and magnetotelluric data at this site.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2016ab241
2016-12-01
2026-01-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berdichevsky, M. N., and V. I. Dmitriev, 2008, Models and methods of Magnetotellurics: Springer.
  2. deGroot-Hedlin, C., and S. Constable, 1990, Occam’s inversion to generate smooth, two-dimensional models from magnetotelluric
  3. data: GEOPHYSICS, 55, 1613-1624. Egbert, G. D., and A. Kelbert, 2012, Computational recipes for electromagnetic inverse problems: Geophysical Journal International, 189, 251-267.
  4. Howe, B. D., J. Townsend, B. Doerner, and P. Patraskovic, 2014, Three-dimensional magnetotelluric inversion and petrophysical interpretation of the Turquoise Ridge gold deposit, Nevada, USA: Presented at the SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2014.
  5. Koivisto, E., A. Malehmir, P. Heikkinen, S. Heinonen, and I. Kukkonen, 2012, 2D reflection seismic investigations at the Kevitsa Ni-Cu-PGE deposit, northern Finland: GEOPHYSICS, 77.
  6. Malehmir, A., C. Juhlin, C. Wijns, M. Urosevic, P. Valasti, and E. Koivisto, 2012, 3D reflection seismic imaging for open-pit mine planning and deep exploration in the Kevitsa Ni-Cu-PGE deposit, northern Finland: GEOPHYSICS, 77.
  7. Simpson, F., and K. Bahr, 2005, Practical Magnetotellurics.
  8. Siripunvaraporn, W., and G. Egbert, 2000, An efficient data-subspace inversion method for 2-D magnetotelluric data: GEOPHYSICS, 65, 791-803.
  9. Takam Takougang, E., B. Harris, A. Kepic, and C. V. A. Le, 2015, Cooperative joint inversion of 3D seismic and magnetotelluric data: With application in a mineral province: GEOPHYSICS, 80, 1-13. Zhou, J., A. Revil, M. Karaoulis, D. Hale, J. Doetsch, and S. Cuttler, 2014, Image-guided inversion of electrical resistivity data: Geophysical Journal International.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2016ab241
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): conductivity; inversion; Magnetotelluric
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error