1887
25th International Conference and Exhibition – Interpreting the Past, Discovering the Future
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

We use resistor network models to explore the relationship between electrical resistivity and permeability in fractures filled with an electrically conductive fluid. The fracture aperture distribution is determined by generating fracture surface pairs that are constructed based on characteristics measured on rock samples. We use these to generate and solve resistor networks with variable hydraulic and electrical resistance. The aperture is incrementally increased, to analyse the changes in both properties as a fault is opened. At small apertures, electrical conductivity and permeability increase moderately with aperture until the fault reaches its percolation threshold. Above this point, the permeability increases by four orders of magnitude over a change in mean aperture of less than 0.1 mm, while the resistivity decreases by up to a factor of 10. The permeability increases at a greater rate than the conductivity, and therefore the percolation threshold can be defined in terms of the matrix to fracture resistivity ratio, M. The value of at the percolation threshold, varies with the ratio of rock to fluid resistivity, the fault spacing, and the fault offset but is always less than 10. Greater values are associated with fractures above their percolation threshold and therefore open for fluid flow.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2016ab259
2016-12-01
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Archie, G., 1942. The electrical resistivity log as an aid in determining some reservoir characteristics, Petroleum Transactions of the Australian Institute of Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, 146, 54-62.
  2. Bahr, K., 1997. Electrical anisotropy and conductivity distribution functions of fractal random networks and of the crust: the scale effect of connectivity, Geophysical Journal International, 130 (3), 649-660.
  3. Brown, S.R., 1987. Fluid flow through rock joints: the effect of surface roughness. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 92 (B2), 1337-1347.
  4. Brown, S.R., 1989. Transport of fluid and electric current through a single fracture. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 94 (B7), 9429-9438.
  5. Brown, S.R., 1995. Simple mathematical model of a rough fracture. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 100 (B4), 5941-5952.
  6. Brown, S.R. and Scholz, C.H., 1985. Broad bandwidth study of the topography of natural rock surfaces. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 90 (B14), 12575-82.
  7. Brush, D.J. and Thomson, N.R., 2003. Fluid flow in synthetic rough-walled fractures: Navier-Stokes, Stokes, and local cubic law simulations. Water Resources Research, 39 (4), 1-15.
  8. Caine, J.S., Evans, J.P. and Forster, C.B., 1996. Fault zone architecture and permeability structure. Geology, 24 (11), 1025-1028. Glover, P.W.J., Matsuki, K., Hikima, R. and Hayashi, K., 1998a. Synthetic rough fractures in rocks. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 103 (B5), 9609-9620.
  9. Glover, P., K. Matsuki, R. Hikima, and K. Hayashi, 1998b. Fluid flow in synthetic rough fractures and application to the Hachimantai geothermal hot dry rock test site, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 103 (B5), 9621-9635.
  10. Kirkby, A., Heinson, G., Holford, S. and Thiel, S., 2015. Mapping fractures using 1D anisotropic modelling of magnetotelluric data: a case study from the Otway Basin, Victoria, Australia. Geophysical Journal International, 201(3), pp.1961-1976.
  11. Kirkby, A., Heinson, G., and Krieger, L., 2016. Relating permeability and electrical resistivity in fractures using random resistor network models. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, accepted manuscript in press.
  12. MacFarlane, J., Thiel, S., Pek, J., Peacock, J. and Heinson, G. (2014), Characterisation of induced fracture networks within an enhanced geothermal system using anisotropic electromagnetic modelling, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 288, 17.
  13. Matsuki, K., Chida, Y., Sakaguchi, K. and Glover, P.W.J., 2006. Size effect on aperture and permeability of a fracture as estimated in large synthetic fractures. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 43 (5), 726-755
  14. Ogilvie, S. R., Isakov, E., and Glover, P. W., 2006. Fluid flow through rough fractures in rocks. II: A new matching model for rough rock fractures, Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 241 (3), 454-465.
  15. Peacock, J. R., Thiel, S., Reid, P., & Heinson, G., 2012. Magnetotelluric monitoring of a fluid injection: Example from an enhanced geothermal system, Geophysical Research Letters, 39(18), 1 -5.
  16. Peacock, J. R., Thiel, S., Heinson, G., & Reid, P., 2013. Time-lapse magnetotelluric monitoring of an enhanced geothermal system, Geophysics, 78(3), B121-B130.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2016ab259
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): faults; fractures; permeability; resistivity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error