1887
1st Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference – Exploration Innovation Integration
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:
PDF

Abstract

The integration of geological modelling, petrophysics and geophysics in a single inversion scheme is a complex and powerful strategy for solving challenges faced in geoscientific resource exploration. Probabilistic geological modelling and geophysical inversion are non-linear processes that show various degrees of sensitivity to uncertainty in input measurements. Using field geological measurements from the Mansfield area (Victoria, Australia) and synthetic geophysical data, we present a synthetic case study investigating the impact of geological uncertainty on constrained joint geophysical inversion. We investigate the influence of uncertain geological measurements on geologically constrained inversion through a sensitivity analysis to uncertainty in orientation data. Probabilistic geological models used to define constraints for geophysical joint inversion are obtained through a Monte-Carlo based uncertainty estimation (MCUE) method. We simulate a broad range of possible cases through a parameter sweep on uncertainty levels in geological measurements to provide a reference for practitioners. The analysis and comparison of the results at varying uncertainty levels show that results can be grouped into two main categories. For the highest uncertainty levels, significant portions of the models retain the characteristic features of geologically unconstrained inversions. Meanwhile, below a threshold in uncertainty level, inversion benefits from the interaction of geophysical data and geologically conditioned constraints. In such cases, inverted models are improved compared to both the geological modelling alone and geologically unconstrained inversion. The conclusion of this work is that knowledge of this threshold is critical for the interpretation of results and decision making because it indicates whether the datasets provide enough information to take advantage of the complementarities between geological modelling and geophysical inversion. Knowledge of this threshold can also support decision making pertaining to inversion strategies and geological field data collection.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abM1_2F
2018-12-01
2026-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bijani, B., Lelievre, P. G., Ponte-Neto, C. F., and Farquharson, C. G., 2017, Physical-property-, lithology- and surface-geometry-based joint inversion using Pareto Multi-Objective Global Optimization, Geophysical Journal International, 209, 730-748.
  2. Colombo, D., and de Stefano, M., 2007, Geophysical modeling via Simultaneous Joint Inversion of seismic, gravity and electromagnetic data: Application to pre-stack depth imaging: The Leading Edge, 26, no. 3, pp. 326-331. doi: 10.1190/1.2715057.
  3. Gallardo, L., and Meju, M. A., 2003, Characterization of heterogeneous near-surface materials by joint 2D inversion of dc resistivity and seismic data: Geophysical Research Letters, 30, no 13, 1-1 - 1-4, doi:10.1029/2003GL017370.
  4. Gao, G., Abubakar, A., Habashy, T. M., and Pan, G., 2012b, joint petrophysical inversion of electromagnetic and full-waveform seismic data: Geogphysics, 77, no. 3, PWA3-WA18, doi: 10.1190/GEO2011-0157.1.
  5. Giraud, J., Pakyuz-Charrier, E., Jessell, M., Lindsay, M., Martin, R., and Ogarko, V., 2017, Uncertainty reduction through geologically conditioned petrophysical constraints in joint inversion. GEOPHYSICS (accepted). https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0615.1.
  6. Giraud, J., Jessell, M., Lindsay, M., Martin, R., and Pakyuz-Charrier, E., 2016, Integrated geophysical joint inversion using petrophysical constraints and geological modelling, Extended Abstract, SEG Annual Meeting Dallas 2016, doi: 10.1190/segam2016-13945549.1
  7. Lelievre, P. G, Farquharson, C., and Hurich, C. A., 2012, Joint inversion of seismic traveltimes and gravity data on unstructured grids with application to mineral exploration: Geophysics, 77, no. 1, P.K1-K15, doi: 10.1190/GEO2011-0154.1.
  8. Mardia, K. V., and Jupp, P., 2000, Directional Statistics (2nd ed.). John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
  9. Martin, R., Monteiller, V., Komatitsch, D., Perrouty, S., Jessell, M., Bonvalot, S., and Lindsay, M., 2013, Gravity inversion using wavelet-based compression on parallel hybrid CPU/GPU systems: application to southwest Ghana: Geophysical Journal International, 195, no. 3, 1594-1619, doi: 10.1093/gji/ggt334.
  10. Paige, C. C., and Saunders, M. A., 1982, LSQR: An algorithm for sparse linear equations and sparse least squares, TOMS 8(1), 43-71.
  11. Pakyuz-Charrier, E., Giraud, J., Lindsay, M., and Jessell ,M., 2017, Common Uncertainty Research Explorer uncertainty estimation in geological 3D modeling, Expanded abstract, Mineral Prospectivity, current approaches and future innovations - Orleans, France, 2426 October 2017.
  12. Reid, A., O’Callaghan, S. T., Bonilla, E. V., McCalman, L., Rawling, T., and Ramos, F., 2013, Bayesian Joint Inversions for the Exploration of Earth Resources: Proceedings of the twenty-third international joint conference on artificial intelligence, P.2877-2884, doi: 10.1.1.415.9471.
  13. Sun, J., and Li, Y., 2013, A general framework for joint inversion with petrophysical information as constraints: SEG 83rd Annual Meeting , SEG, Expanded Abstract, pp. 3093-3097, doi: 10.1190/segam2013-1185.1.
  14. Sun, J., and Li, Y., 2016, Joint inversion of multiple geophysical and petrophysical data using generalized fuzzy clustering algorithms: Geophysical Journal International, 208, 1201-1216, doi: 10.1093/gji/ggw442.
  15. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P., 2004, Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing. 13 (4), 600-612, doi:10.1109/TIP.2003.819861.
  16. Zhang, J., and Revil, A., 2015, 2D joint inversion of geophysical data using petrophysical clustering and facies deformation: Geophysics, 80, no. 5, M69-M88, doi: 10.1190/GEO2015-0147.1.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abM1_2F
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): geological modelling; geophysical integration; inversion; sensitivity analysis
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error