1887
1st Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference – Exploration Innovation Integration
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

We show how clustering algorithms can ensure that the core intervals that are pertinent to specific objectives of a sampling campaign are actually sampled. We also show how clusters can be validated prior to sampling with auxiliary data not used for the cluster analysis.

We chose to target our core sampling to ensure that both clay poor and clay rich intervals of the Springbok Sandstone are sampled. The clay phases in the Jurassic Springbok Sandstone generally do not exhibit a prominent gamma ray signature and are therefore poorly defined in wireline logs. Similar, hydrogeological properties of the Springbok Sandstone are not well defined through wireline logs. This introduces uncertainty to groundwater models of the Springbok Sandstone. Hence, a better understanding of the clay distribution is thought to be a key to improve the definition of the hydrogeological properties of the Springbok Sandstone. We applied our sample targeting approach to five study wells from the Surat Basin in Queensland. We tailored the application of the cluster analysis to our working hypothesis that the variability of hydrogeological properties of the Springbok Sandstone is controlled by the presence and type of clays, rather than compaction. This informed our choice of wireline logs to include in the clustering (nuclear logs) and of logs to be used for control purpose (resistivity logs, spontaneous potential).

We show that identification of five clusters was the most useful number towards our sampling objectives. This allowed for example to exclude coal and siderite layers from sampling for clay analysis and to focus on the differentiation of the clastic sediments in the formation. Further, we show that certain clusters correlate with resistivity and spontaneous potential log signatures. The correlation between the categorical clusters based on nuclear logs and continuous wireline logs not used in the cluster analysis allowed us to interpret the meaning of the clusters in the context of our project and target our sampling to ensure that all clusters are represented in our sample set.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abM2_1C
2018-12-01
2026-01-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Arthur, D., and Vassilvitskii, S., 2007, k-means++: the advantages of careful seeding: Proceedings of the eighteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, USA. pp. 1027-1035.
  2. Ellis, D.V. and Singer, J.M., 2007, Well logging for earth scientists (Vol. 692). Dordrecht: Springer.
  3. Exon, N.F., 1976, Geology of the Surat Basin in Queensland., Bureau of Mineral Resources, Australia. Bulletin, 166
  4. Gallagher, V. 2012, Reservoir Characterisation of Jurasic Springbok Sandstone, Surat Basin, Queensland, Honours Thesis, University of Adelaide.
  5. Green P. M. ed. 1997, The Surat and Bowen Basins South-East Queensland. Queensland Minerals and Energy Review Series. Queensland Department of Mines and Energy, Brisbane.
  6. Hamilton, S.K., Esterle, J.S. and Sliwa, R., 2014, Stratigraphic and depositional framework of the Walloon Subgroup, eastern Surat Basin, Queensland. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 61(8), pp.1061-1080.
  7. Levy, M. and Gaede, O. , 2018, Identification Of Clay Minerals Within The Springbok Formation, Surat Basin, AEGC 2018 conference volume.
  8. MacQueen, J., 1967, Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations. Proc. Fifth Berkeley Symp. on Math. Statist. and Prob., Vol. 1 (Univ. of Calif. Press, 1967), 281--297.
  9. OGIA, 2016, Underground Water Impact Report for the Surat Cumulative Management Area. Office of Groundwater Impact Assessment, Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Brisbane Queensland
  10. Power, P.E., Devine, S.B., 1968, Some ammendments of the Jurassic stratigraphic nomenclature in the Great Artesian Basin., Queensland Government Mining Journal, 69(799), p194-201
  11. Ransley, T.R., Radke, B.M., Feitz, A.J., Kellett, J.R., Owens, R., Bell, J., Stewart, G. and Carey, H. 2015, Hydrogeological Atlas of the Great Artesian Basin. Geoscience Australia, Canberra. http://dx.doi.org/10.11636/9781925124668
  12. Underschultz, J.R., Pasini, P., Grigorescu, M. and de Souza, T.L., 2016, Assessing aquitard hydraulic performance from hydrocarbon migration indicators: Surat and Bowen basins, Australia. Marine and Petroleum Geology, 78, pp.712-727
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abM2_1C
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Clays; Cluster Analysis; Machine Learning; Surat Basin; Wireline Data
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error