1887
1st Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference – Exploration Innovation Integration
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Acquiring seismic data has typically been an expensive pursuit due to the high price of the acquisition systems. Such systems are also typically not easily adaptable to suit different acquisition scenarios. In this paper we detail how you can build your own simple, low-cost (~$60/channel), seismic acquisition system. Data recorded using such systems is comparable to that obtained using a far more expensive commercial seismograph.

Seismic sources are similarly expensive with the only low-cost option being a sledgehammer. In this paper we also describe how to manufacture a small vibroseis unit from easily available components at a cost of less than $3,000. This unit has a wider, more controllable, bandwidth than an impact source and can be easily adapted to create a shear wave source for MASW surveys.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abM2_1H
2018-12-01
2026-01-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bagaini, C., T. Dean, J. Quigley, and G.-A. Tite. 2008, Systems and methods for enhancing low-frequency content in Vibroseis acquisition. . US.
  2. Brewer, K., T. Cartwright, and A. Pugin. 2013, The microvibe, a new multi-component portable seismic vibrator, Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 2013. 786-786.
  3. Dean, T., N. Nguyen, and A. Kepic. 2017, A new, simple, low-cost, portable Vibroseis for research and near-surface surveys. In EAGE Conference and Exhibition. Paris, France.
  4. Dean, T., N. Nguyen, A. Kepic, B. Armitage, and H. Rossiter. 2017, The democratization of seismic acquisition, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2017. 201-205.
  5. Dean, T., J. Quigley, S. MacDonald, and C. Readman. 2016, The design of optimized broadband vibroseis sweeps. The Leading Edge, 35, no. 8,684-688.
  6. Haines , S. S. 2006, Design and Application of an Electromagnetic Vibrator Seismic Source. Journal of Environmental & Engineering Geophysics, 11, no. 1,9-15. doi: 10.2113/jeeg11.1.9.
  7. Krawczyk, C. M., U. Polom, and T. Beilecke. 2013, Shear-wave reflection seismics as a valuable tool for near-surface urban applications. The Leading Edge, 32, no. 3,256-263. doi: 10.1190/tle32030256.1.
  8. Krawczyk, C. M., U. Polom, S. Trabs, and T. Dahm. 2012, Sinkholes in the city of Hamburg-New urban shear-wave reflection seismic system enables high-resolution imaging of subrosion structures. Journal of Applied Geophysics, 78,133-143.
  9. Nijhof, V. 1990, Portable high-frequency vibrator implemented in a compact PC-based seismic system, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1990. 942-943.
  10. Nijhof, V. P. B. J. 1989, Portable, high-frequency vibrator forh high-resolution shallow seismic profiling, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1989. 670-671.
  11. Pugin, A., K. Brewer, T. Cartwright, S. E. Pullan, D. Perret, H. Crow, and J. A. Hunter. 2013, Near surface S-wave seismic reflection profiling- new approaches and insights. First Break, 31, no. 2,49-60.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abM2_1H
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): acquisition; land; seismic
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error