1887
1st Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference – Exploration Innovation Integration
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

The primary variable of interest in a coal resource study is the volume of coal as estimated from the coal thicknesses in each drill hole. It is therefore essential to accurately determine, down to the centimetre level, the thickness of each seam. To attain this accuracy, each drill hole is geophysically logged as these logs provide a considerably more accurate indicator of seam boundary depths than the geologist’s log. Currently, coal geologists spend a large amount of their time integrating their logs with depth information from the geophysical logs. They do this by displaying the two logs next to each other and then manually changing the depths in their logs. Most of this process is relatively routine and thus rather tedious and boring but like many seemingly simple cognitive tasks, not easily transformed into a computer algorithm. The manual method also suffers from being subjective and often non-repeatable.

Previous methods to automate this process have used multivariate statistical techniques to assign lithologies down the hole based on the geophysical values at each reading depth. However, despite these methods having been developed and publicized for over thirty years they still have not been widely adopted as they still do not integrate the information from the two types of data. Following the generation of a lithology log from the geophysics, geologists still need to manually integrate it with their log.

This current study has successfully managed to develop algorithms to automatically determine both coal/non-coal and clayey/non-clayey boundaries based on the gradients and inflection points of the geophysical logs and then integrate this information with the geologist’s log.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abM2_2A
2018-12-01
2026-01-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Chang, H., Kopaska-Merkel, D.C., Chen, H., and Durrans S., 2000, Lithofacies identification using multiple adaptive resonance theory neural networks and group decision expert system. Computers & Geosciences 26: 591 -601.
  2. Coalfields Council of New South Wales and Resource Council of Queensland, 2014, Australian Guidelines for the Estimation and Classification of Coal Resources. www.jorc.org/docs/Coal Guidelines 2014 - Final Ratified Document.pdf.
  3. Cram, A.A., Turczynski, G.P.J., Godesse, M., Low, G., Driver, I.J., and Ozawa, N., 1995, AI assisted coal interpretation techniques. APCOM XXV 1995, Brisbane, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne.
  4. Davis, A.C., and Christensen, N.B., 2013, Derivative analysis for layer selection of geophysical borehole logs. Computer & Geosciences 60: 34-40.
  5. Fallon, G.N., Fullagar, P.K., and Zhou B., 2000, Towards grade estimation via automated interpretation of geophysical borehole logs. Exploration beyond 2000; conference edition. M. Dentith and M. Middleton. Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Brisbane.
  6. Kerzner M.G., 1986, Image processing in well log analysis. International Human Resources Development Corporation, Boston.
  7. Larkin, B.J., 1985, Multivariate statistical analysis of downhole logs from the Meandu coalfield. Exploration Geophysics: 375-386.
  8. Larkin B.J., and Lay B.K., 1996, Computer aided lithology interpretation from geophysical logs. Thirtieth Newcastle Symposium, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
  9. Larkin, B.J., 2017, Project C24016, Automatic Determination of Lithology Boundaries from Downhole Geophysical Logs, Australian Coal Association Research Program (ACARP).
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abM2_2A
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): coal exploration; downhole geophysical logs; geology geophysics integration
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error