1887
1st Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference – Exploration Innovation Integration
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Theoretical investigation and laboratory testing indicate that it may be possible to detect buried sulphide deposits by utilising non-linearity of electrical conduction between semi-conducting sulphide grains. In these tests, the method of detection of the non-linear conductivity effects relies on the heterodyne principle whereby two frequencies will mix to give intermodulation sum and difference frequencies in the presence of non-linear conduction.

Field tests of the method were run over known mineralisation at the Kempfield deposits 180km west of Sydney. Two modified Induced Polarisation transmitters were used in a gradient array configuration. Signals were detected using custom built receivers incorporating both 24-bit and 31-bit analog-to-digital converters.

Significant logistical problems were encountered due to a number of factors including interference from one transmitter on another and possible interference in the receiver circuitry. The transmitter to transmitter interference precluded trialling the use of a DC bias to emphasise any non-linear mixing terms. Evidence of the interference between transmitters highlighted the need for careful checking that the intermodulation effects are not arising within the electronic circuitry rather than from the earth. The data gathered in the field trial is confusing in that it has obvious problems with signals that are not related to the desired effects. However, when approximate corrections for these are made, a pattern emerges that is correlated with the known sulphide distribution and Induced Polarisation responses.

It appears that the heterodyne method has detected sulphide mineralisation at Kempfield but there are many obstacles to overcome before this can routinely be used for exploration.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abM3_2F
2018-12-01
2026-01-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Busch, D., 2017, 10 Metre Gold intersection Returned by 1st Kempfield Assays: Argent Minerals Ltd. Australian Stock Exchange Announcement, 2 February 2017.
  2. Katsube, T.J. and Collett, L.S. and Aherns, R.H., 1973. “Electrical Non-linear Phenomena in Rocks”, Geop. Vol. 38, No.1, pp. 106-124.
  3. McGilvray, C. T., 2017, Kempfield VHMS Deposit - Discovering rich new horizons: Discoveries in the Tasminides 2017, Australian Institute of Geoscientists Bulletin 67.
  4. Mitchell, G. G. and Russell, R. D. 1980, A Search for Nonlinear Effects in Electrical Prospecting Methods: Canadian Society of Exploration Geophysicists Journal, 16, No.1, 38-44.
  5. Oertel, A et al., 2018, Laboratory Confirmation of Non-linear Electrical Effects in Mineralised Rocks: 1st Australian Exploration Geoscience Conference, Extended Abstracts (This volume).
  6. Shaub, Y.B., 1965. “Use of the Non-linear Conductivity Effect in Rocks for Electrical Prospecting”. Bull (IZV.) Acad. Sci. USSR, Earth Physics. No.6, pp. 76-81
  7. Timms, P. D. and David, V. 2011, Kempfield Silver, Barite and Base Metals (Pb-Zn) Deposit, Lachlan Orogen, Eastern Australia: Eighth International Mining Geology Conference - Queenstown, New Zealand, 22-24 August 2011.
  8. White, R. M. S., 1974, A Study of Nonlinear Effects in Mineralised Rocks: M.Sc. Thesis, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abM3_2F
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): heterodyne method; Kempfield; Non-linear conduction; sulphide exploration
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error