1887
1st Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference – Exploration Innovation Integration
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Assessment of gullies is essential in understanding the effects soil erosion has on resource management, urban planning, agricultural productivity and local environmental conditions. Commonly, prediction of gully head cut retreat has been disregarded due to the inherent complexities; this study proposes a method of analysing data to interpret potential pathways of Gully retreat. Through the implementation of electrical geophysics (Electrical Resistivity Imaging & Frequency Domain Electromagnetics) surveys positioned uphill of existing gullies shallow conductor’s representative of Lateral Preferential Pathways (LPP) will be detected. ERI results detected conductors uphill of the head cut at varying distances showing resistivity values of 1 -40 Qm; these identified anomalous zones were confidently linked to form an LPP. Integrated geophysical datasets were generated allowing for interpreted traces of LPP to be drawn which are representative of the future pathway of head cut retreat. Through comparing currently existing gully assessment techniques it is suggested that a combination of geophysical prediction of LPP and LiDAR data is necessary for a complete understanding of existing gullies. Based on the results of this integration, informed and targeted management decisions can be developed to remediate current landforms and mitigate future gullying.

There has been recent focus placed on near surface groundwater and surface run-off flows as they have been attributed to erosion of consolidated and unconsolidated material resulting in incised surface channels referred to as gullies, which pose significant issues for agricultural productivity and local infrastructure (Beavis, 2000, Wu and Cheng, 2005). To effectively manage these erosional features through mitigation an understanding of the occurrence and future erosional pathways is required, although prediction is difficult when topographic variations are not obvious.

Local hydrological conditions will determine the nature of surface flows and groundwater movement including the infiltration depth, flow direction and rate of movement, although it is generally understood that water flows through physical or chemical channels known as (Clothier et al., 2007). Pathways develop within a medium due to the heterogeneities in the physical properties of the material that the water is flowing through.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abP024
2018-12-01
2026-01-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. BEAVIS, S. G. 2000. Structural controls on the orientation of erosion gullies in mid-western New South Wales, Australia. Geomorphology, 33, 59-72.
  2. CARRAZZA, L. P. M., CESAR AUGUSTO & HELENE, L. P. I. 2016. Gully cavity identification through electrical resistivity tomography. Brazillian Journal of Geophysics, 34, Draft.
  3. CLOTHIER, B. E., GREEN, S. R. & DEURER, M. 2007. Preferential flow and transport
  4. in soil: progress and prognosis. European Journal of Soil Science, 59, 213.
  5. COLLISON, A. J. C. 2001. The cycle of instability: stress release and fissure flow as controls on gully head retreat. Hydrological Processes, 15, 3-12.
  6. CORWIN, D. L. & LESCH, S. M. 2005a. Apparent soil electrical conductivity measurements in agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 46, 11-43.
  7. CORWIN, D. L. & LESCH, S. M. 2005b. Characterizing soil spatial variability with apparent soil electrical conductivity. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 46, 103-133.
  8. FRANKL, A., POESEN, J., DECKERS, J., HAILE, M. & NYSSEN, J. 2012. Gully head
  9. retreat rates in the semi-arid highlands of Northern Ethiopia. Geomorphology, 173-174, 185-195.
  10. LAZZARI, M., LOPERTE, A. & PERRONE, A. 2010. Near surface geophysics techniques and geomorphological approach to reconstruct the hazard cave map in historical and urban areas. Advances in Geosciences, 24, 35-44.
  11. LE ROUX, J. J. & SUMNER, P. D. 2012. Factors controlling gully development: Comparing continuous and discontinuous gullies. Land Degradation & Development, 23, 440-449.
  12. MELLIGER, J. J. & NIEMANN, J. D. 2010. Effects of gullies on space-time patterns of soil moisture in a semiarid grassland. Journal of Hydrology, 389, 289300.
  13. NYSSEN, J., VEYRET-PICOT, M. , POESEN, J., MOEYERSONS, J., HAILE, M. , DECKERS, J. & GOVERS, G. 2004. The effectiveness of loose rock check dams for gully control in Tigray, northern Ethiopia. Soil Use and Management, 20, 55-64.
  14. PERROY, R. L., BOOKHAGEN, B., ASNER, G. P. & CHADWICK, O. A. 2010. Comparison of gully erosion estimates using airborne and ground-based LiDAR on Santa Cruz Island, California. Geomorphology, 118, 288-300.
  15. POESEN, J., NACHTERGAELE, J., VERSTRAETEN, G. & VALENTIN, C. 2003. Gully erosion
  16. and environmental change: importance and research needs. Catena, 50, 91133.
  17. ROBINSON, D. A., BINLEY, A., CROOK, N., DAY-LEWIS, F. D., FERRE, T. P. A., GRAUCH, V. J. S., KNIGHT, R., KNOLL, M. , LAKSHMI, V., MILLER, R., NYQUIST, J., PELLERIN, L., SINGHA, K. & SLATER, L. 2008. Advancing process-based watershed hydrological research using near-surface geophysics: a vision for, and review of, electrical and magnetic geophysical methods. Hydrological Processes, 22, 3604-3635.
  18. SAMANI, A. N., CHEN, Q., KHALIGHI, S., WASSON, R. J. & RAHDARI, M. R. 2016. Assessment of land use impact on hydraulic threshold conditions for gully head cut initiation. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20, 3005-3012.
  19. SIDORCHUK, A. 1999. Dynamic and static models of gully erosion. Catena, 37, 401414.
  20. STAVI, I., PEREVOLOTSKY, A. & AVNI, Y. 2010. Effects of gully formation and headcut retreat on primary production in an arid rangeland: Natural desertification in action. Journal of Arid Environments, 74, 221-228.
  21. STEIN, O. R. & LATRAY, D. A. 2002. Experiments and modeling of head cut migration in stratified soils. Water Resources Research, 38, 20-1-20-12.
  22. VALENTIN, C, POESEN, J. & LI, Y. 2005. Gully erosion: Impacts, factors and control. Catena, 63, 132-153.
  23. VANMAERCKE, M., POESEN, J., VAN MELE, B., DEMUZERE, M., BRUYNSEELS, A., GOLOSOV, V., BEZERRA, J. F. R., BOLYSOV, S., DVINSKIH, A., FRANKL, A., FUSEINA, Y., GUERRA, A. J. T., HAREGEWEYN, N., IONITA, I., MAKANZU IMWANGANA, F., MOEYERSONS, J., MOSHE, I., NAZARI SAMANI, A., NIACSU, L., NYSSEN, J., OTSUKI, Y., RADOANE, M., RYSIN, I., RYZHOV, Y. V. & YERMOLAEV, O. 2016. How fast do gully headcuts retreat? Earth-Science Reviews, 154, 336-355.
  24. WELLS, R. R., ALONSO, C. V. & BENNETT, S. J. 2009. Morphodynamics of Headcut Development and Soil Erosion in Upland Concentrated Flows. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 73, 521.
  25. WU, Y. & CHENG, H. 2005. Monitoring of gully erosion on the Loess Plateau of China using a global positioning system. Catena, 63, 154-166.
  26. ZHOU, Q. Y., SHIMADA, J. & SATO, A. 2001. Three-dimensional spatial and temporal monitoring of soil water content using electrical resistivity tomography. Water Resources Research, 37, 273-285.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abP024
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error