1887
1st Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference – Exploration Innovation Integration
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:
PDF

Abstract

Airborne time domain electromagnetic (ATEM) surveys have reached the stage where full waveform streamed data are recorded and delivered in addition to traditional survey products. One result of this advance in technology is that the line between the acquisition and processing phases has become more flexible and many parameters that used to be hardwired in acquisition can now be adapted during the processing phase. In order to make use of this opportunity the interpreter needs a clear description and understanding of the system specific corrections required to isolate geological responses as well as the effects of filters and other digital signal enhancement options that are available.

Validating procedures on a synthetic data set is one way of ensuring that all geological responses falling within similar parameter ranges would be accurately presented after processing. In this study the effects of three time-series and four spatial filters were analyzed. Streamed full waveform data were simulated by adding measured high altitude data to synthetic models. The various filters were applied and the deviations from the true models compared with that of the unfiltered data. The results were evaluated based on whether the filtered results showed more or less deviation than the unfiltered data from the original noise-free models.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abP038
2018-12-01
2026-01-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Combrinck, M., Wright, R., 2016, “Achieving accurate interpretation results from full-waveform streamed data AEM surveys”: ASEGPESA 2016, Adelaide, Australia, Expanded Abstracts
  2. Fraser, D.C., Fuller, B.D. and Ward, S.H., 1966. “Some numerical techniques for application in mining exploration.”: Geophysics, 31(6), 1066-1077.
  3. Macnae, J.C., Lamontagne, Y., and West, G.F., 1984, “Noise processing techniques for time-domain EM systems”: Geophysics 49, 934-948.
  4. Naudy, H., and Dreyer, H., 1968, “Essai de filtrage non-lineaire applique aux profiles aeromagnetiques (Attempt to apply nonlinear filtering to aeromagnetic profiles)”: Geophysical Prospecting, 16, 171-178.
  5. T. W. Parks and J. H. McClellan., 1972, “Chebyshev approximation for nonrecursive digital filters with linear phase.”: IEEE Trans. on Circuit Theory, 19:189-94.
  6. Savitzky, A., Golay, M.J.E. (1964). “Smoothing and Differentiation of Data by Simplified Least Squares Procedures”: Analytical Chemistry, 36 (8): 1627-39.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abP038
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error