1887
1st Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference – Exploration Innovation Integration
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Geomechanics helps us understand the life-cycle of a hydrocarbon reservoir and, in turn, impacts geophysical monitoring programs. A common geomechanical problem is to predict reservoir compaction or zones of abnormal pore pressure. These predictions mostly use simple empirical relations, but recently, the use of rock deformation models based on static poroelasticity are becoming the norm. These models require accurate values for the poroelastic parameters. We present a digital rock workflow to determine these poroelastic parameters which are difficult to extract from well-log or laboratory measurements. The drained pore modulus is determinant in the compaction problem. This modulus represents the ratio of pore volume change to confining pressure when the fluid pressure is constant. In laboratory experiments, bulk volume changes are accurately measured by sensors attached to the outer surface of the rock sample. In contrast, pore volume changes are notoriously difficult to measure because these changes need to quantify the pore boundary deformation. Hence, accurate measures of the drained pore modulus are challenging. We simulate static deformation experiments at the pore-scale utilizing digital rock images. We model an Ottawa F-42 sand pack obtained from X-ray micro-tomographic images. We stack two-dimensional micro-CT images to generate a three-dimensional F-42 sand pack sample. We extract a sub-volume from this sample for numerical simulation. We first segment the cropped sample consists of grains and pore spaces and then use the segmentation to generate a volumetric mesh. We compute the elastic, linear momentum balance in the structural domain (grains) and solve the system using the commercial software package ABAQUS. The network of grains (solid phase) is assumed elastic, isotropic, and homogeneous. We calculate the change in pore volume using a new post-processing algorithm, which allows us to compute the local changes in pore volume due to the applied load. This process yields an accurate drained pore modulus. We then use an alternative estimate of the drained pore modulus. We exploit its relation to the drained bulk modulus and the solid phase bulk modulus (i.e., Biot’s coefficient) using the digital rock workflow. Finally, we compare the drained pore modulus values obtained from these two independent analyses and find reasonable agreement.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abP055
2018-12-01
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahmed, S., Muller, T. M., Liang, J., Tang, G., and Madadi, M., 2017, Macroscopic deformation moduli of porous rock: Insights from digital image pore-scale simulations: 6th Biot conference on poromechanics, July 9-13, 2017, Paris, France.
  2. Altmann, J., Muller, T. M., Muller, B. I. R., Tingay, M. R. P., and Heidbach, O., 2010, Poroelastic contribution to the reservoir stress path: International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 47, 1104-1113,
  3. Biot, M.A., 1941, General theory for three-dimensional consolidation: Journal of Applied Physics, 12, 155-164.
  4. Biot, M.A., and Willis, D.G., 1957, The elastic coefficients of the theory of consolidation: Journal of Applied Mechanics, 24, 594601.
  5. Cheng, A.H.-D., 2016, Poroelasticity: Springer, New York.
  6. De Oliviera, G.P., Ceia, M.A.R., Missagia, R.M., Archilha, N.L., Figueiredo, L., Santos, V.H., and Lima Neto, I., 2016, Pore volume compressibilities of sandstones and carbonates from Helium porosimetry measurements: Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 137, 185-201.
  7. Jalalh, A.A., 2006, Compressibility of porous rocks: Part I. Measurements of Hungarian reservoir rock samples: Acta Geophysica, 54, 319-332.
  8. Makhnenko, R.Y., and Labuz, J.F., 2016, Elastic and inelastic deformation of fluid saturated rock: Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 374, 20150422.
  9. Mavko, G., Dvorkin, J. Mukerji, T., 2008, Rock Physics Handbook: Tools for Analysis of Porous Media, Cambridge.
  10. Muller, T. M., and P. N. Sahay, 2013, Porosity perturbations and poroelastic compressibilities: Geophysics, 78, no. 1, A7-A11.
  11. Muller, T.M., and Sahay, P.N., 2016a, Generalized poroelasticity framework for micro-inhomogeneous rocks: Geophysical
  12. Prospecting, 64, 1122-1134.
  13. Muller, T.M., and Sahay, P.N., 2016b, Biot coefficient is distinct from effective pressure coefficient: Geophysics, 81, L27-L33.
  14. Omdal, E., M. Madland, H. Breivik, K. Naess, R. Korsnes, A. Hiorth, and T. Kristiansen, 2009, Experimental investigation of the effective stress coefficient for various high porosity outcrop chalks: Presented at the 43rd US Rock Mechanics Symposium and 4th U.S.-Canada Rock Mechanics Symposium, 1-4.
  15. Sahay, P. N., Spanos, T. J. T., and de la Cruz, V., 2001, Seismic wave propagation in inhomogeneous and anisotropic porous media: Geophysical Journal International, 145, 209-222.
  16. Sahay, P. N., 2013, Biot constitutive relation and porosity perturbation equation: Geophysics, 78, no. 5, L57-L67
  17. Schutjens, P. and Heidug, W., 2012, On the pore volume compressibility and its application as a petrophysical parameter: 9th Biennial International Conference & Exposition on Petroleum Geophysics, P-512, 1-17.
  18. Wang, H. F., 2000, Theory of Linear Poroelasticity: Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abP055
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Biot coefficient; Digital rock workflow; Drained pore modulus; Poroelasticity
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error