1887
1st Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference – Exploration Innovation Integration
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Understanding of compaction trends of elastic and hydraulic properties in anisotropic shales is crucial for exploration of energy resources, ecological disposal of nuclear waste, and hydrogeological applications. However, complexity of the natural shale mineralogy and lack of quality data available for analysis results in poor knowledge of these compaction trends.

Careful control over the shale mineralogy, pore fluid composition and applied stresses allows us to simulate the natural environments and acquire quality data on the properties of artificial shales. Here for the first time we present methodology and describe a setup that allows simultaneous acquisition of all five independent elastic constants and extremely low hydraulic permeability values of transversely isotropic artificial shale samples during mechanical compaction experiments (porosity decrease from 40% to 10%).

Hydraulic permeabilities of artificially compacted samples are comparable to the ones of natural shales. Permeability drops exponentially with compaction. Silt fraction and clay mineralogy are the two key parameters that are responsible for broad variations of permeability in shales with the same porosity. We provide analytical equations that allow calculating permeability if porosity and silt fraction are known.

Elastic constants of clay matrix exhibit positive linear trends with the porosity decrease. Small variations in clay mineralogy have a minor effect on absolute values of elastic coefficients or anisotropy but lead to noticeable increase of the compressional (VP) to shear (VS) velocities ratio at the same porosity. Finally, strong correlations (R2 above 0.95) of the hydraulic permeability with acoustic impedance and VP/V S ratio are observed for all the prepared samples.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abP057
2018-12-01
2026-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bandyopadhyay, K., 2009, Seismic Anisotropy: Geological Causes and Its Implications to Reservoir Geophysics. Stanford University. Beloborodov, R., Pervukhina, M., Luzin, V., Delle Piane, C., Clennell, M.B., Zandi, S., and Lebedev, M., 2016, Compaction of Quartz-
  2. Kaolinite Mixtures: The Influence of the Pore Fluid Composition on the Development of Their Microstructure and Elastic Anisotropy. Marine and Petroleum Geology78, 426-38.
  3. Bernabe, Y., Mok, U., and Evans, B., 2006, A Note on the Oscillating Flow Method for Measuring Rock Permeability. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences43, 311-16.
  4. Dellinger, J. and Vernik, L., 1994, Do Travel-Times in Pulse-Transmission Experiments Yield Anisotropic Group or Phase Velocities. Geophysics59, 1774-79.
  5. Dewhurst, D.N., Aplin, A.C., Sarda, J.P., and Yang, Y.L., 1998, Compaction-Driven Evolution of Porosity and Permeability in Natural Mudstones: An Experimental Study. Journal of Geophysical Research-Solid Earth103, 651-61.
  6. Dewhurst, D.N. and Siggins, A.F., 2006, Impact of Fabric, Microcracks and Stress Field on Shale Anisotropy. Geophysical Journal International165, 135-48.
  7. Fawad, M., Mondol, N.H., Jahren, J., and Bjorlykke, K., 2010, Microfabric and Rock Properties of Experimentally Compressed Silt-Clay Mixtures. Marine and Petroleum Geology27, 1698-712.
  8. Fischer, G.J., 1992, Chapter 8 the Determination of Permeability and Storage Capacity: Pore Pressure Oscillation Method. in Evans Brian and Wong Teng-fong (eds.) International Geophysics, Academic Press, 187-211.
  9. Hasanov, A.K., 2014, Reservoir Transport and Poroelastic Properties from Oscillating Pore Pressure Experiments.
  10. Keller, L.M., Holzer, L., Wepf, R., Gasser, P., Munch, B., and Marschall, P., 2011, On the Application of Focused Ion Beam Nanotomography in Characterizing the 3d Pore Space Geometry of Opalinus Clay. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth36, 1539-44.
  11. Kranz, R.L., Saltzman, J.S., and Blacic, J.D., 1990, Hydraulic Diffusivity Measurements on Laboratory Rock Samples Using an Oscillating Pore Pressure Method. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts27, 345-52.
  12. Lonardelli, I., Wenk, H.R., and Ren, Y., 2007, Preferred Orientation and Elastic Anisotropy in Shales. Geophysics72, D33-D40.
  13. Miller, D.E., Horne, S.A., and Walsh, J., 2012, Precise Inversion of Logged Slownesses for Elastic Parameters in a Gas Shale Formation. Geophysics77, B197-B206.
  14. Mondol, N.H., Bjorlykke, K., and Jahren, J., 2008, Experimental Compaction of Clays: Relationship between Permeability and Petrophysical Properties in Mudstones. Petroleum Geoscience14, 319-37.
  15. Song, I. and Renner, J., 2007, Analysis of Oscillatory Fluid Flow through Rock Samples. Geophysical Journal International170, 195204.
  16. Thomsen, L., 1986, Weak Elastic-Anisotropy. Geophysics51, 1954-66.
  17. Wang, Q., Cui, Y.J., Tang, A.M., Barnichon, J.D., Saba, S., and Ye, W.M., 2013, Hydraulic Conductivity and Microstructure Changes of Compacted Bentonite/Sand Mixture During Hydration. Engineering Geology164, 67-76.
  18. Yang, Y.L. and Aplin, A.C., 2010, A Permeability-Porosity Relationship for Mudstones. Marine and Petroleum Geology27, 1692-97.
  19. Zadeh, M.K., Mondol, N.H., and Jahren, J., 2016, Experimental Mechanical Compaction of Sands and Sand-Clay Mixtures: A Study to Investigate Evolution of Rock Properties with Full Control on Mineralogy and Rock Texture. Geophysical Prospecting64, 915-41.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abP057
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Compaction trends; elastic anisotropy; permeability; shale
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error