1887
1st Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference – Exploration Innovation Integration
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

We obtain the basic parameters of the rocks of Qingshankou formation by performing the rock uniaxial and triaxial compression mechanics experiments. Different brittleness indexes are computed and we select the best brittleness index of B2 (E/u, Young’s modulus / Poisson’s ratio) to evaluate rock brittleness characteristics. The coefficient of brittle stress drop is introduced to evaluate rock brittleness characteristics which coincide with the selected brittleness index. The relationships between brittleness indexes and rock parameters such as elastic parameters, mineral components and reservoir physical properties (porosity, and density) are analyzed. Results show that E and u are the good indicators of rock brittleness, while shale content has no obviously influence on the elastic parameters. Quartz and carbonate minerals are considered as brittle components for evaluating rock brittleness. There is a good correlation between the brittleness index B2 and reservoir porosity, which is important for analyzing rock brittleness characteristics in the study area.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abP063
2018-12-01
2026-01-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ALTINDAG, R., 2010, Assessment of some brittleness indexes in rock-drilling efficiency: Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 43, 361-370.
  2. Guo, Z., Li, X, Liu, C., Feng, X., and Shen, Y., 2013, A shale rock physics model for analysis of brittleness index, mineralogy and porosity in the Barnett Shale: Journal of Geophysics and Engineering, 10(2), 25006.
  3. Ge, X. R., 1997, Post failure behaviour and a brittleplastic model of brittle rock: Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics. Rotterdam: Balkema, 151-160.
  4. Jarvie, D. M., Hill, R. J., Ruble, T. E., and Pollastro, R. M., 2007, Unconventional shale-gas systems: The Mississippian Barnett Shale of north-central Texas as one model for thermogenic shale-gas assessment: AAPG bulletin, 91(4), 475-499.
  5. Li, J., 2013, The mineral components of the shale in dong ying sag and brittleness analysis: Journal of sedimentary, 31(4), 616-620.
  6. Liu, Z., and Sun, Z, 2015, New brittleness indexes and their application in shale/clay gas reservoir prediction: Petroleum Exploration and Development, 42(1), 117.
  7. Rickman, R. M., Mullen, E. Petre, B. Grieser, and D. Kundert, 2008, A practical use of shale petrophysics for simulation design optimization: All shale plays are not clones of the Barnett Shale: Proceedings of the Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 115258.
  8. Tarasov, B., and Potvin, Y, 2013, Universal criteria for rock brittleness estimation under triaxial compression: International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 59, 57-69.
  9. Xia, Y., Li, L, Tang, C., Ma, S., Li, M., and Bao C., 2016, Rock brittleness evaluation based on stress dropping rate after peak stress and energy ratio: Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 06, 1141-1154.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abP063
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error