1887
1st Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference – Exploration Innovation Integration
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

There are several ways to estimate overburden cover thickness. One of the non-invasive and inexpensive ways to rapidly estimate the cover thickness is the Horizontal-to-Vertical Spectral Ratio (HVSR) of the ambient seismic noise method. This approach utilises a broadband three-component sensitive seismometer to record ambient noise (or microtremor) induced by the wind, ocean waves and several anthropogenic activities. These microtremors are mainly composed of Rayleigh Waves which propagate in the surface layer.

The Tromino® seismometer, which works on the HVSR principle, is a very light and portable instrument that records seismic noise in the frequency range of 0.1 to 1024 Hz, and is capable of estimating overburden cover up to 100’s of metres depth, depending on the ambient noise strength and geological setting of the survey area.

The ratio of the horizontal-to-vertical (H/V) component of the shear wave (Vs) spectrum is used to calculate the peak resonance frequency at a particular survey station, which is used to estimate the overburden thickness by using one or more existing drill holes in the area, 1D modelling, or local geological knowledge about the overburden to get velocity information for calculating depth. This paper discusses different methods used to calculate the overburden thickness, which includes calculations using a hybrid approach and a regression equation.

This paper shows the results of a Tromino® HVSR survey in North West Zambia and comparison of estimated overburden thickness using different methods. The results were further compared with those determined from Audio-MagnetoTellurics (AMT) and drilling data. Tromino® successfully estimated the overburden thickness and mapped the bedrock topography with reasonable accuracy.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abT4_3D
2018-12-01
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Buckerfield, S., Czarnota, K., Gorbatov, A., 2016: Benchmarking passive seismic cover depth assessments: 25th ASEG conference, Adelaide, Expanded Abstracts.
  2. Morgan, D. J. R., Raines, M.G., Thorpe, S., Castellaro, S., Bailey, E., Wilby, P.R., 1988, Passive Seismic Surveying: A new and Cost-effective site-assessment tool for the quarrying industry: www.Agg-Net.com pp 20-22.
  3. Nakamura, Y., 2000, Clear identification of fundamental idea of Nakamura’s technique and its applications, Proc. 12WCEE, No. 2656, 177-102.
  4. Owers, M.C., Meyers, J.B., Siggs, B., Shackleton, 2016, Passive Seismic surveying for depth to base of paleochannel mapping at Lake wells, Western Australia: 25th ASEG Conference, Adelaide, Expanded Abstracts pp 42-50.
  5. Smith N. R. A., Reading A. M., Michael A. W., Charles F.W., 2013, Depth to basement and seismic velocity structure from passive seismic soundings in central Australia: 23rd ASEG Conference, Melbourne, Expanded Abstracts, pp1-4
  6. Raines, M.G., Banks, V.J., Chambers, J.E., and Collins, P.E.F., 2015, The Application of Passive Seismic Techniques to the detection of Buried Hollows: 14th Sinkhole Conference, Rochester, Expanded Abstracts, pp 423-429.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abT4_3D
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Passive Seismic; Air-Core; AMT; HVSR; Kalahari
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error