1887
1st Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference – Exploration Innovation Integration
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Resistivity and acoustic scanner image logs, in both the CSG and coal-mining industries, are the preferred means of determining azimuths of joints and cleat in coal. This paper indicates the need for care when interpreting cleat azimuths from image logs.

Image logs of the bore wall often exhibit large fractures (joints) that intersect the entirety of the bore wall. They are visible as sinusoidal traces. Those fractures that have low height (cleat), and intersect the bore wall in one or two places, are represented by vertical to sub-vertical linear traces on an image log. These lineations can be represented on a stereo- or polar net as a point with a plunge and trend. Both joints and cleat generally have high dips (greater than 75°).

Resistivity image logs detect both joints and cleat. Acoustic image logs often only record joints. The value of obtaining cleat, joint and horizontal stress azimuths, is in planning the optimal orientation of deviated in-seam (lateral) production wells.

An image log of a cleat lineation records the bore wall intersection azimuth (BIAZ), that is an apparent azimuth, as well as the apparent dip (or plunge) of the lineation. The best way to determine true azimuth of cleat from lineations, on an image log, is from a statistical weighted mean of numerous BIAZ measurements. In some instances, cleat azimuth has been calculated as 90° to BIAZ. Some interpreters view the dispersion of azimuths as a natural feature, when the dispersion is an artefact arising from the intersection of cleat of the same azimuth, at varying distances from the centre of a bore wall.

Petal fractures (PF) in coal, when combined with breakout information, can also be used to determine or ground truth joint/cleat azimuths of both large and small scale fractures. Bedding-plane observations of core also provides cleat/fracture information not obtainable from an image log.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abT6_1C
2018-12-01
2026-01-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bell, J.S., 2006. In-situ stress and coal bed methane potential in Western Canada. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 54, 197-220.
  2. Dawson, G.K.W and Esterle, J.S., 2010. Controls on coal cleat spacing. International Journal of Coal Geology, 82, 213-218.
  3. Gray, I and See, L. 2007. The measurement and interpretation of in-situ stress using an overcoring technique from surface. In: Rock Mechanics: Meeting Society’s Challenges and Demands - Eberhardt, Stead and Morrison (eds), 721-727
  4. Laubach, SE., Marrett, RA, Olson and Scott, A.R., 1998. Characteristics and Origins of coal cleat: A review. International Journal of Coal Geology, 35, 175-207.
  5. Mukherjee, S., Copley, J. and Esterle, J. 2017. In-situ Stress and Fracture Controls on Permeability Distribution within Walloon Subgroup, Surat Basin. Under review for presentation at the Asia Pacific Oil and Gas Conference and Exhibition, Bali, 16th -19th October, 2017. SPE-186413-MS.
  6. Titheridge, D.G., 2014. Drilling induced fractures in coal core from vertical exploration wells: a method to determine cleat azimuth, and the angle between cleat and maximum horizontal stress, and its application: In: Aziz, N. (eds), 2012. 14th Coal Operators Conference, 12th -14th, February, 2014, Wollongong, 8-17.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abT6_1C
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): azimuth; image logs; interpretation
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error