1887
1st Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference – Exploration Innovation Integration
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Time gating is a commonly used approach in the pre-processing of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) data before Laplace inversion. Gating suppresses spurious signals that can degrade recovered decay time distributions and therefore often stabilizes inversion. However, care must be taken in applying this technique to real world data where both non-Gaussian and correlated noise decrease the efficacy of noise reduction through stacking. If not properly accounted for, unreliable noise estimates introduce inversion artefacts. Fortunately, noise realization proxies obtained through data phasing can be used to bootstrap reliable confidence intervals for the windowed data. Benefits of the approach are demonstrated through inversion of synthetics as well as borehole data from a deep carbon capture and sequestration application. We also introduce an open source cross platform data processing utility with these capabilities which interested persons can use to explore the impacts of various processing workflows.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abT6_2H
2018-12-01
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Balch, R. & McPherson, B., 2016. Integrating enhanced oil recovery and carbon capture and storage projects: A case study at Farnsworth field, Texas, Society of Petroleum Engineers annual Meeting.
  2. Behroozmand, A. A., Auken, E., Fiandaca, G., Christiansen, A. V., & Christensen, N. B., 2012. Efficient full decay inversion of mrs data with a stretched-exponential approximation of the distribution, Geophysical Journal International, 190(2), 900-912.
  3. Behroozmand, A. A., Keating, K., & Auken, E., 2015. A review of the principles and applications of the nmr technique for near-surface characterization, Surveys in Geophysics, 36(1), 27-85.
  4. Braun, M., Hertrich, M., & Yaramanci, U., 2005. Study on complex inversion of magnetic resonance sounding signals, Near surface geophysics, 3(3), 155-163.
  5. Calvetti, D., Lewis, B., L.Reichel, & Sgallari, F., 2004. Tikhonov regularization with nonnegatvity contraint, electronic transactions on numerical analysis, 18, 153-173.
  6. Dunn, K., Bergman, D., & LaTorraca, G., 2002. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance: Petrophysical and Logging Applications, Handbook of Geophysical Exploration: Seismic Exploration, Elsevier Science.
  7. Grunewald, E. & Walsh, D., 2013. Multiecho scheme advances surface nmr for aquifer characterization, Geophysical Research Letters, 40(24), 6346-6350.
  8. Hansen, P. C., 1992. Analysis of discrete ill-posed problems by means of the L-curve, SIAM Review, 34, 561-580.
  9. Hein, A., Larsen, J. J., & Parsekian, A. D., 2017. Symmetry based frequency domain processing to remove harmonic noise from surface nuclear magnetic resonance measurements, Geophysical Journal International, 208(2), 724.
  10. Irons, T. P. & Li, Y., 2014. Pulse and Fourier transform surface nuclear magnetic resonance: comprehensive modelling and inversion incorporating complex data and static dephasing dynamics, Geophysical Journal International, 199(3), 1372-1394.
  11. Kenyon, W., Day, P., Straley, C., & Willemsen, J., 1988. A three-part study of nmr longitudinal relaxation properties of water-saturated sandstones, SPE Formation Evaluation, 3(3), 622-636.
  12. Legchenko, A. & Valla, P., 1998. Processing of surface proton magnetic resonance signals using non-linear fitting, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 39(2), 77-83.
  13. Li, Y. & Oldenburg, D., 2000. 3-d inversion of induced polarisation data, Geophysics, 65(6), 1931-1945.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abT6_2H
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): data-processing; hydrogeophysics; inverse theory; statistics
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error