1887
1st Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference – Exploration Innovation Integration
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Simulation of multiphase flow systems are of critical importance in managing hydrological systems. Flow simulations are affected by a number of factors including structure and flow properties including porosity and permeability as well as the anisotropy and heterogeneity of these properties. In many cases traditional hydrological and reservoir data are highly affected by these parameters, but are not directly sensitive to them. As such modellers often adjust these parameters in an ad hoc manner until solutions numerically converge. Simulation models are generally based on structural data from reflection seismics whose physical flow properties are then populated using geostatistical extrapolation techniques utilizing a sparse number of borehole logs and core analysis. In multiphase systems including enhanced oil recovery and carbon capture and sequestration uncertainties regarding phase-dependent physical properties confounds this challenge further. Geophysical methods provide a means by which to gain an improved understanding of phase distributions in the subsurface. In this paper we will look at applications from active carbon capture and sequestration and enhanced oil recovery applications, as well as synthetic examples. Geophysical data including electromagnetic and gravity are inverted using structural constraints from the reservoir model. Inversions are then mapped into flow properties using calibrated relations such as Archie’s Equation. The coupled models can then be used to both verify and improve on the reservoir flow model which improves it’s predictive power and utility as a management tool.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abW10_3B
2018-12-01
2026-01-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Borner, J. H., Herdegen, V., Repke, J.-U. and Spitzer, K. (2013), The impact of CO2 on the electrical properties of water bearing porous media - laboratory experiments with respect to carbon capture and storage. Geophysical Prospecting, 61: 446-160. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01129.x
  2. Carey, William J., Marcus Wigand, Steve J. Chipera, Giday WoldeGabriel, Rajesh Pawar, Peter C. Lichtner, Scott C. Wehner, Michael A. Raines, George D. Guthrie Jr. (2007), Analysis and performance of oil well cement with 30 years of CO2 exposure from the SACROC Unit, West Texas, USA, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, Volume 1, Issue 1, April 2007, Pages 75-85, ISSN 1750-5836, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1750-5836(06)00004-1.
  3. Dai, Zhenxue, Richard Middleton, Hari Viswanathan, Julianna Fessenden-Rahn, Jacob Bauman, Rajesh Pawar, Si-Yong Lee, and Brian McPherson (2014), An Integrated Framework for Optimizing CO2 Sequestration and Enhanced Oil Recovery. Environmental Science & Technology Letters, 1 (1), 49-54, doi: 10.1021/ez4001033
  4. Gasda, S. E, S. Bachu, M.A. Celia (2004), The potential for CO2 leakage from storage sites in geological media: analysis of well distribution in mature sedimentary basins. Environmental Geology, 46 (6-7), 707-720
  5. Glegola, M., P. Ditmar, R. Hanea, O. Eiken, F. Vossepoel, R. Arts, and R. Klees, 2012, History matching time-lapse surface-gravity and well-pressure data with ensemble smoother for estimating gasfield aquifer support - A 3D numerical study: SPE Journal, 17, 966-980
  6. Grayver, A. V., Rita Streich, and Oliver Ritter (2014). 3D inversion and resolution analysis of land-based CSEM data from the Ketzin CO2 storage formation. GEOPHYSICS, 79(2), E101-E114. doi: 10.1190/geo2013-0184.1
  7. Kiessling, D. C. Schmidt-Hattenbergera, H. Schuett, F. Schilling, K. Kruegera, B. Schoebel, et al.(2010). Geoelectrical methods for monitoring geological CO2 storage: first results from cross-hole and surface-downhole measurements from the CO2SINK test site at Ketzin (Germany) Int. J Greenh. Gas Control, 4, pp. 816-826
  8. Krahenbuhl, R., Y. Li, and T. Davis, 2011 The Leading Edge, Special Issue (Time-Lapse measurements). Understanding the applications and limitations of time-lapse gravity for reservoir monitoring. The Leading Edge, 30, Issue 9, 1060 - 1068.
  9. Liang, L., Abubakar, A., & Habashy, T. M. (2011). Production Monitoring Using Joint Inversion of Marine Controlled-source Electromagnetic Data And Production Data. Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  10. Minsley, Burke, M. Andy Kass, Greg Hodges, and Bruce D. Smith (2014). Multielevation calibration of frequency-domain electromagnetic data. GEOPHYSICS, 79(5), E201-E216. doi: 10.1190/geo2013-0320.1
  11. Oettinger, G., V. Haak, J.C. Larsen (2001). Noise reduction in magnetotelluric time-series with a new signal-noise separation method and its application to a field experiment in the Saxonian Granulite Massif. Geophysical Journal International, 146(3), 659-669. doi: 10.1046/j. 1365-246X.2001.00473.x
  12. Sternberg, B. K., Washburne, J. C., & Pellerin, L. (1988). Correction for the static shift in magnetotellurics using transient electromagnetic soundings. Geophysics, 53(11), 1459-1468.
  13. Streich, Rita (2015), Controlled-Source Electromagnetic Approaches for Hydrocarbon Exploration and Monitoring on Land. Surveys in Geophysics, 37(1), 47-80. doi: 10.1007/s10712-015-9336-0”
  14. Tang, W., Li, Y., Swidinsky, A. and Liu, J. (2015), Three-dimensional controlled-source electromagnetic modelling with a well casing as a grounded source: a hybrid method of moments and finite element scheme. Geophysical Prospecting, 63: 1491 -1507. doi: 10.1111/1365-2478.12330
  15. Vilamajo, E., Rondeleux, B., Queralt, P., Marcuello, A. and Ledo, J. (2015), A land controlled-source electromagnetic experiment using a deep vertical electric dipole: experimental settings, processing, and first data interpretation. Geophysical Prospecting, 63: 15271540. doi: 10.1111/1365-2478.12331
  16. Wirianto, M., Mulder, W. A. and Slob, E. C. (2010), A feasibility study of land CSEM reservoir monitoring in a complex 3-D model. Geophysical Journal International, 181: 741-755. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04544.x
  17. Young, G.B.C., Lintz, V.A, Widmann, B.L., Bird, D.A., and Cappa, J.A., 2007, CO2 sequestration potential of Colorado: Colorado Geological Survey Resource Series 45.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abW10_3B
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): CCS; electromagnetic methods; multiphase flow
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error