1887
1st Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference – Exploration Innovation Integration
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

A quantitative interpretation workflow utilising AVO inversion based lithology prediction data was developed to directly assess reserves and resources for an LNG development project in the Carnarvon Basin. The study area is covered by modern MAZ PSDM 3D seismic data using broadband acquisition and processing techniques, calibrated by numerous well intersections of the Triassic Mungaroo Formation reservoirs.

Interpretation of the fluvio-deltaic reservoir bodies can be somewhat interpretive using ‘traditional’ workflows. By interpreting chronostratigraphic events tied to well-based biostratigraphy and then using the lithology prediction volumes, the interpretation of reservoir bodies becomes more objective.

Seismic inversion data are typically used to qualitatively guide resource assessments, through amplitude mapping or use in static and dynamic modelling. In this case study, the inversion based prediction volumes are used to extract P90, P50 and P10 sand geobodies which are directly input into probabilistic reserve and resource assessments. The workflow is applied to discovered, developed, undeveloped and prospective reservoirs.

Geobody extraction required the PSDM depth data to be accurately calibrated to wells. A calibrated velocity model was built by perturbing the imaging velocities in a 3D model to tie the chronostratigraphic events associated with all the reservoir intervals. Fluid contacts derived from wells were used to provide a depth cut-off to the geobody extractions.

The resulting reserve and resource assessments from this workflow show an excellent match with previous assessments including static and dynamic modelling methods. The geobodies also identified previously unrecognised channel sands not easily interpreted on full and angle stack data.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abW8_3A
2018-12-01
2026-01-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Duaij, E., Al-Maraghi, M., Zaid, T., & Klopf, T. (2013). Application of seismic attributes in estimating gas resources in complex fluvial channel reservoirs. SPE Kuwait Oil and Gas Show and Conference. Kuwait: SPE. Alvarez, P., Bolivar, F., Marin, W., Di Lucas, M., & Salinas, T. (2014). Seismic Quantitative interpretation of a gas bearing reservoir - From rock physics to volumetric. EAGE Conference and Exhibition. 76. Amsterdam: EAGE.
  2. Di Luca, M., Salinas, T., Arminio, J. F., Alvarez, G., Alvarez, P., Bolivar, F., & Marin, W. (2014, July). Seismic inversion and AVO analysis applied to predictive-modeling gas-condensate sands for exploration and early production in the Lower Magdalena Basin, Colombia. The Leading Edge, 33(7), 746-756. doi:10.1190/tle33070746.1
  3. DownUnder Geosolutions. (2014). Harmony Joy QI Report. Perth: DownUnder Geosolutions.
  4. Etris, E. L., Crabtree, N. J., & Dewar, J. (2002, November). True depth conversion: more than a pretty picture. CSEG Recorder, 26(9).
  5. Geoscience Australia. (2015). Regional Geology. Retrieved June 28th, 2017, from Offshore Petroleum Exploration Acreage Release, Australia 2015: http://archive-petroleumacreage.industry.slicedtech.com.au/2015/geology/northern-carnarvon-basin/geology
  6. Lamont, M. G., Thompson, T. A., & Bevilacqua, C. (2008). Drilling success as a result of probabilistic lithology and fluid prediction a case study in the Carnarvon Basin, WA. APPEA, 1-12.
  7. Marshall, N. G., & Lang, S. C. (2013). A new sequence stratigraphic framework for the North West Shelf, Australia. West Australian Basins Symposium. Perth: PESA.
  8. Moyen, R., & Doyen, P. M. (2009). Reservoir Connectivity uncertainty from stochastic seismic inversion. SEG Technical Program Expanded ABstracts (pp. 2378-2382). Houston: SEG. doi:10.1190/1.3255337
  9. O’Neill, A. J., & Thompson, T. A. (2016, October). Improved depth conversion with FWI - a case study. First Break, 34(10), 85-89.
  10. Shadlow, J. M., Craig, A. J., & Christiansen, D. C. (2016, June). Is there a benefit to throwing the kitchen sink at geotechnical studies in an exploration phase. The APPEA Journal, 56(1), 203-218. doi:10.1071/AJ15015
  11. Van Der Weiden, R., Nayak, P., & Swinburn, P. (2012, September). Seismic technology supporting reserves determinations: Gorgon field, Australia. The Leading Edge, 31(9), 1050-1058. doi:10.1190/tle31091050.1
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abW8_3A
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Lithology prediction; Probabilistic Reserves; Seismic Inversion
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error