1887
1st Australasian Exploration Geoscience Conference – Exploration Innovation Integration
  • ISSN: 2202-0586
  • E-ISSN:

Abstract

Aside from historical issues of mechanical durability and efficiency, the design of marine vibrators (MVs) for towed streamer operations are confronted by several practical challenges to their different possible applications: 1. Alternatives to conventional air gun arrays for flexible and creative acquisition geometries, 2. Low power alternatives to air gun arrays for environmentally sensitive applications, and 3. High power ultra-low frequency sources specific to Full Waveform Inversion (FWI) optimization.

One relevant consideration to MV operations is the volume of water that must be displaced per cycle to achieve a desired Sound Pressure Level (SPL); increasing exponentially as the frequency of interest decreases, and becoming significant at frequencies less than about 5 Hz. This is particularly relevant for FWI optimization as the frequencies of interest are in the range of 1-6 Hz. Another consideration is that ultra-low frequency output theoretically benefits from deeper towing enhanced by the well-known free-surface ghost effect, but in practice, deeper towing is confronted by an air spring effect that increases the force required per cycle to generate a desired SPL, and is due to the surrounding hydrostatic pressure at depth.

Environmental motivations to develop low power vibrator concepts are driven by regulatory restrictions upon received SPL and Sound Exposure Level (SEL), and we demonstrate how low power MVs can be configured to yield low SPL and SEL metrics without compromising geophysical performance-in contrast to the use of air gun arrays with few elements. MVs enable independence from large compressors and may be more easily deployed in spatially distributed geometries than air gun arrays. We present examples of flextensional MV development verified by numerical modelling, tow tank testing, and field verification; collectively supporting the principles discussed herein.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abW9_2A
2018-12-01
2026-01-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Berkhout, A.J., Blacquiere, G., and Verschuur, E., 2017, Enlarging the bandwidth of seismic images. SEG Expanded Abstracts, 180-185.
  2. Cambois, G., Long, L., Parkes, G., Lundsten, T., Mattsson, A., and Fromyr, E., 2009, Multi-Level airgun array: A simple and
  3. effective way to enhance the low frequency content of marine seismic data. SEG Expanded Abstracts, 152-156.
  4. Coste, E., Gerez, D., Groenaas, H., Hopperstad, J.-F., Larsen, O.P., Laws, R., Norton, J., Padula, M., and Wolfstirn, M., 2014,
  5. Attenuated high-frequency emission from a new design of air-gun. SEG Expanded Abstracts, 132-137.
  6. Crocker, M.J., 1998, Handbook of acoustics. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1488 p.
  7. Dellinger, J., 2016, Challenges to extending the usable seismic bandwidth at the seafloor in the deep water GoM. SEG Expanded Abstracts, 66-70.
  8. Dellinger, J., Ross, A., Meaux, D., Brenders, A., Gesoff, G., Etgen, J., Naranjo, J., Openshaw, G., and Harper, M., 2016, Wolfspar®, an “FWI-friendly” ultralow-frequency marine seismic source. SEG Expanded Abstracts, 4891-4895. Dragoset, B., 2000, Introduction to air guns and air-gun arrays. The Leading Edge, 19(8), 892-897.
  9. Duncan, A.J., Weilgart, L.S., Leaper, R., Jasny, M., and Livermore, S., 2017, A modelling comparison between received sound levels produced by a marine vibroseis array and those from an airgun array for some typical seismic survey scenarios. Marine Pollution Bulletin, In press.
  10. IAGC, 2014, Lowest Practicable Source Levels (LPSL): The implications of adjusting seismic source array parameters. Working paper of the International Association of Geophysical Contractors. 10 p.
  11. ISO, 2017, Underwater acoustics - Terminology. International Standard, ISO 18405:2017(E), 52 p.
  12. LGL and MAI, 2011, Environmental assessment of marine vibroseis. LGL Rep. TA4604-1; JIP contract 22 07-12. Rep. from LGL Ltd., environ. Res. Assoc., King City, Ont., Canada, and Marine Acoustics Inc., Arlington, VA, U.S.A., for Joint Industry Programme, E&P Sound and Marine Life, Intern. Assoc. of Oil & Gas Producers, London, U.K., 207 p.
  13. National Marine Fisheries Service, 2016, Technical guidance for assessing the effects of anthropogenic sound on marine mammal hearing: Underwater acoustic thresholds for onset of Permanent and Temporary Threshold Shifts. U.S. Dept. of Commer., NOAA. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMGS-OPR-55, 178 p.
  14. Parkes, G., and Hegna, S., 2011, A marine seismic acquisition system that provides a full ‘ghost-free’ solution. SEG Expanded Abstracts, 37-41.
  15. Tabti, H., Hey, T., Wright, A., Barker, D., and Drossaert, F., 2017, Shot by shot source wave field estimation. EAGE Extended Abstracts, Tu A4 07.
  16. Tenghamn, R., 2006, An electrical marine vibrator with a flextensional shell. Exploration Geophysics, 37(4), 286-291.
/content/journals/10.1071/ASEG2018abW9_2A
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): air gun; environment; FWI; Marine vibrator
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error