1887
Volume 31, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Airborne and ground magnetic surveys are a primary exploration tool in the search for kimberlites. Interpretation of magnetic data provides direct information on possible pipe magnetic signatures and indirect information about the structural setting of the area.

Magnetic anomaly screening in an area of highly active magnetic relief and magnetic texture such as an Archean shield area or volcanic terrain is very difficult. Conventional techniques such as stacked profile interpretation and modelling/inversion are almost impossible, as there is so much interference and overlap between adjacent anomalies. There is also the additional problem of distinguishing possible kimberlite sources from other sources with very similar magnetic signatures. However, the magnetic signature of kimberlite pipes is band limited so enhancing wavelengths of interest plays an important part in interpretation.

Semi-automatic interpretation, using a combination of specialised filters and analytical techniques can provide objective information on anomaly attributes. These can be used in conjunction with the geological setting of the area to prioritise anomalies for follow-up. The application of separation or layer filters allows deconvolution of the causative sources around a particular mean depth. Plotting of gradient maxima/strike symbols maps circular or elliptical anomalies as closed clusters. 3D Euler deconvolution provides first-pass depth estimates and an indication of the nature of the source. Finally, matched filtering using a cylinder model can identify roughly circular anomalies over a broad range of amplitudes and wavelengths.

Anomalies selected in the first phase are refined by automatic profile analysis and the total anomaly attributes compiled into a database. Finally targets are assessed in their geological context, using available geology and the magneto-tectonic interpretation of the area.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG00066
2000-03-01
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bilim, F. and Ates, A., 1999, A computer program to estimate the source body magnetisation direction from magnetic and gravity anomalies: Computers and Geosciences, 25, 231-240.
  2. Cowan, D.R. and Cowan, S., 1993, Separation filtering applied to aeromagnetic data: Expl. Geophys., 24, 429-436.
  3. Dentith, M.C., 1995, Textural filtering of aeromagnetic data: Expl. Geophys., 26, 209- 214.
  4. Keating, P., 1995, A simple technique for identifying magnetic anomalies due to kimberlite pipes: Expl. Mining Geol., 4, 121-125.
  5. Paterson, N.R., Kwan, K.C.H. and Reford, S.W., 1991, Use of Euler deconvolution in recognizing magnetic anomalies of pipe-like bodies: 61st Ann. Internat. Mtg. Soc. Expl. Geophys Expanded Abstracts, 442-645.
  6. Pilkington, M. and Roest, W.R., 1998, Removing varying directional trends in aeromagnetic data: Geophysics, 63, 446-453.
  7. Rajagopalan, S. and Milligan, P., 1994, Image Enhancement of aeromagnetic data using automatic gain control: Expl. Geophys. 25, 173-178.
  8. Thompson, D.T., 1982. EULDPH - A new technique for making computer assisted depth estimates from magnetic data: Geophysics, 47, 31-37.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG00066
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Gradient maxima; kimberlites; magnetic surveys; matched filter; separation filter

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error