1887
Volume 31, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

The regolith in the Lawlers district, Western Australia, can be divided into a number of geologically identifiable layers. Saprolite commonly forms one of the thickest and least dense of these layers, and appears to be by far the most porous material encountered in the section. Porosity derived from many samples averaged 37.8%. The solid constituents of saprolite are not solely clay, saprolite rather is an extremely weathered rock type with a retained fabric that supports its structure and which behaves as a clayey sand. While the constituent clays (predominantly smectite over mafics and ultramafics, and kaolinite over felsics) are inherently conductive, the very high porosity suggests that the measured conductivity of saprolite in-situ should be dominated by the salinity of the local groundwater, even if contained fluids are only slightly saturated.

Previous work has suggested that the conductance and/or conductivity of the saprolite layer are different over different lithologies. However, physical property measurements indicate that the conductivity of saprolite cannot uniquely be used to determine parent lithology. These physical property studies indicated overlaps in electrical properties for metasedimentary, felsic, mafic and ultramafic saprolites and also overlying palaeochannel clays. However provided that groundwater conductivities are not too variable, diagnostic conductance differences may occur, particularly since the saprolite layer over felsic lithologies is usually reported to be thinner than that developed over mafics or ultramafics.

Below the saprolite layer, a saprock layer is defined that contains the transition from virtually unweathered bedrock to heavily weathered saprolite. This transitional layer retains much of the structural strength and density of bedrock, and thus has very similar seismic velocity to bedrock. Its conductivity however, is far greater than that of the bedrock: possibly reflecting the influence of connected conductive paths that mark the passage of fluids during the weathering process. Above the saprolite, regolith materials have much lower porosities and higher densities. They also tend to be lower in conductivity than the saprolite. The geological processes of deep argillisation and surface and mid-level ferruginisation, accompanied by silicification are responsible for the physical property variations described above.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG00229
2000-03-01
2026-01-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Anand, R. R. and Smith, R. E., 1993, Regolith distribution, stratigraphy and evolution in the Yilgarn Craton - implications for exploration: Kalgoorlie 1993 Conference Abstracts, 187-193, Austral. Geol. Surv. Org. (see also, Excursion Guide Notes for Excursion 33, 88-93).
  2. Atkins, J. E. and McBride, E. F., 1992, Porosity and packing of Holocene River, dune, and beach sands: Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol., 76, 339-355.
  3. Bishop, J. R., Sattel, D., Macnae, J. C. and Munday, T. J., in press, Electrical structure of the regolith in the Lawlers district, Western Australia: Expl. Geophys.
  4. Butt, C. R. M. and Anand, R. R., 1994, Terminology of deeply weathered regoliths: Abstract,Volume Australian Regolith Conference'94, Austral. Geol. Surv. Org. Record 1994/56, 11-12.
  5. Butt, C. R. M. and Nickel, E. H., 1981, Mineralogy and geochemistry of the weathering of the disseminated nickel sulfide deposit at Mt Keith, Western Australia: Econ. Geol., 76, 1736-1751.
  6. Dauth, C., 1997, Airborne magnetic, radiometric and satellite imagery for regolith mapping in the Yilgarn Craton of Western Australia: Expl. Geophys., 28, 199-203.
  7. Dentith, M. C., Evans, B. J., Paish, K. F. and Trench, A., 1992, Mapping the regolith using seismic refraction and magnetic data: Results from the Southern Cross Greenstone Belt, Western Australia: Expl. Geophys., 23, 97-104.
  8. Dentith, M.C., Frankcombe, K. and Trench, A., 1994, Geophysical signatures of West Australian mineral deposits: An overview, in Dentith, M.C., Frankcombe, K.F., Ho., S.E., Shepherd, J.M., Groves, D.I. and Trench, A., Eds, Geophysical signatures of West Australian mineral deposits: ASEG special publication 7, 29-84.
  9. Duncan, A. C., Roberts, G. P., Buselli, G., Pik, J. P.,Williamson, D. R., Roocke, P. A., Thorn, R. G. and Anderson, H. A., 1992, SALTMAP - Airborne EM for the environment: Expl. Geophys., 23, 123-126.
  10. Edmundson, H. N., 1988a, Archie’s law: electrical conduction in clean, water-bearing rock: The Technical Review, 36, No 3, 4-13.
  11. Edmundson, H. N., 1988b, Archie II: electrical conduction in hydrocarbon-bearing rock: The Technical Review, 36, No 4, 12-21.
  12. Emerson, D. W., 1967, Aquifer water resistivity - salinity relations: J. and Proc. Royal Soc. NSW, 101, 17-21.
  13. Emerson, D. W. and Macnae, J. C., in prep, The petrophysics of the Lawlers regolith, Western Australia.
  14. Emerson, D. W. Mills, K. J., Miyakawa, K., Hallett, M. S. and Cao, L. Q., 1993, The petrophysics, geophysics and structure of the Koongarra site, Northern Territory: Expl. Geophys., 24, 1-71.
  15. Emerson, D. W. and Yang, Y. P., 1997, Insights from laboratory mass property crossplots: ASEG Preview, 70, 10-14.
  16. Hurst, A. and Nadeau, P. H., 1995, Clay microporosity in reservoir sandstones: An application of quantitative electron microscopy in petrophysical evaluation: Bull. Am. Assoc. Petrol. Geol., 79, 563-573.
  17. Manger, G. E., 1963, Porosity and bulk density of sedimentary rocks: U.S. Geol. Surv., Bulletin 1144-E.
  18. Mayes, K. A., 1992, Application of geophysical electrical and magnetic methods to regolith mapping at Lawlers: B.Sc. (Hons) thesis, Curtin Univ. of Technology.
  19. Munday, T. J., Macnae, J. C. and Bishop, J. R., submitted,: Geological constraints on regolith electrical structures at Lawlers, Western Australia: Expl. Geophys.
  20. Olhoeft, G. R., 1981, Electrical properties of rocks, in Touloukian, Y.S., Judd, W.R and Roy, R.F., Eds, Vol.11-2 Physical properties of rocks and minerals, 257-325: McGraw-Hill.
  21. Sattel, D., 1996, Resolving shallow conductivity structures - the Lawlers regolith and the feasibility of an EM gradiometer: Ph.D thesis, Macquarie Univ.
  22. Steeples, D. W., 1995, Near-surface seismology. Short course notes: Soc. of Expl. Geophys.
  23. Street, G. J. and Anderson, H. A, 1993, Airborne magnetic surveys of the regolith: Expl. Geophys., 24, 795-800.
  24. Waxman, M. H. and Smits L. J. M., 1968, Electrical conductivities in oil-bearing shaly sands: J. Soc. Petr. Eng., 8, 107-122.
  25. Whincup, P. and Domahidy, G., 1982a, The Agnew nickel project - groundwater supply: Proceedings AWRC Canberra conference, Groundwater in fractured rock, 251-260.
  26. Whincup, P. and Domahidy, G., 1982b, The Agnew nickel project - No.1 mine dewatering. Proceedings AWRC Canberra conference, Groundwater in fractured rock, 261-271.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG00229
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Conductivity; density; Lawlers; physical properties; porosity; regolith; velocity

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error