1887
Volume 31, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Groundwater in the Clare Valley is drawn from fractured rock aquifers. As such aquifers underlie approximately 40% of Australia, an understanding of sustainability and distribution of groundwater resources is important for agricultural and domestic purposes. The primary goal of the work described here was to assess the value of geophysical methods in determining the capture zones of irrigation bores in the Clare Valley aquifers. Azimuthal resistivity surveys utilising DC resistivity and EM induction were performed to evaluate the presence of electrical (and thus hydraulic) anisotropy and heterogeneity. A mise-à-la-masse survey was also carried out at one borehole. Both symmetric and asymmetric azimuthal DC resistivity and EM induction data were acquired. The asymmetric-array results indicate the presence of heterogeneities. The major axes of the DC-resistivity ellipses are approximately parallel to the direction of vertical bedding planes for electrode separations between 20 and 40 m. However, EM-resistivity ellipses at most sites are nearly perpendicular, with resistivity minima corresponding to observed bedding planes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG00255
2000-03-01
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Jansen, J. and Jurcek, P., 1997, The application of surficial geophysics to well site exploration and wellhead protection in fracture controlled aquifers, Proceedings of the Symposium of the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems 1997, 635-644.
  2. McNeil, J. D., 1980, Electromagnetic terrain conductivity measurement at low induction numbers, Technical Note Tn-6, Geonics Limited.
  3. Morton, D., Love, A.J., Clarke, D., Martin R., Cook, P.G. and McEwan, K., 1998, Clare Valley groundwater resources, Progress Report 1, PIRSA.
  4. Rust, K. A., Sandberg S. K. and Auken, E., 1997, Physical-scale modelling of the azimuthal electromagnetic response in the macroanisotropic case, Proceedings of the Symposium of the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, 715-723.
  5. Sandberg, S. K. and Jagel, D. L., 1996, The electromagnetic azimuthal resistivity method, Proceedings of the Symposium of the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems, 31-40.
  6. Skjernaa, L. and Jørgensen, N.O., 1994, Evaluation of local fracture systems by azimuthal resistivity surveys: examples from south Norway: Applied Hydrology, Feb., 19-25.
  7. Slater L.D., Sandberg S.K. and Jankowski M., 1998, Survey design procedures and data processing techniques applied to the EM azimuthal resistivity method: JEEG, Vol. 3, Issue 4, 1998, 167-177.
  8. Telford, W. M., Geldart, L. P., Sherrif, R. E. and Keys, D. A., 1984, Applied Geophysics, Cambridge University Press.
  9. Taylor, R. W. and Fleming, A. H., 1988, Characterising jointed systems by azimuthal resistivity surveys: Ground Water, 26, 464-473.
  10. Watson, K. A. and Barker, R. D., 1999, Differentiating anisotropy and lateral effects using azimuthal resistivity offset Wenner soundings: Geophysics, 64, 739-745.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG00255
Loading

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error