1887
Volume 31, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

A significant limitation of conventional seismic reflection technology is that it poorly constrains seismic velocities in the deep part of the section. These velocities are needed for seismic migration, to convert from time to depth, and to estimate the likely rock composition at depth. Seismic observations at large offsets can compensate for this limitation. The Australian Geological Survey Organisation recorded high-quality refraction and wide-angle reflection seismic data using ocean-bottom seismographs (OBS) along 5 profiles on Australia’s North West Shelf, to maximum offsets of 300 km. The OBS transects coincide with previously acquired deep-crustal seismic-reflection profiles. Consequently, velocity information can now be derived from two independent data sets: common-depth point (near-vertical) reflection data and refraction/wide-angle reflection data. Residual (difference between these two velocity data sets) velocity images can be produced and analysed. Even within the top 5 km of the section residuals between the OBS- and CDP-derived interval velocities vary from -0.5 to +3.5 km/s and increase further with depth. Consequently, the depth equivalent of 4 s two-way time will vary by up to 1.2 km or 10%. The practical implications of co-processing of seismic velocity information are: improved seismic velocity estimation, more accurate depth migration and depth conversion of seismic data and less distortion of amplitudes and shapes of geological structures after depth conversion.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG00347
2000-03-01
2026-01-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Al-Chalabi, M., 1994, Seismic velocities - a critique: First Break: 12, 589-596.
  2. Colwell, J.B. and Kennard, J.M. (compilers), 1996, AGSO Petrel Sub-basin study 1995-1996: Summary Report, AGSO Record 1996/40.
  3. Dix, C.H., 1955, Seismic velocities from surface measurements: Geophysics, 20, 68-86.
  4. Dziewonski, A.M. and Anderson, D.L., 1981, Preliminary reference Earth model: Phys. Earth and Planet. Int., 25, 297-356.
  5. Gardner, L.W., 1947, Vertical velocities from reflection shooting: Geophysics, 12, 221-228.
  6. Goncharov, A., Collins, C., Petkovic, P., Fomin, T., Pilipenko, V., Drummond, B. and Lee, C.S., 1998a, Ocean-bottom seismograph and reflection surveys in the Petrel Sub-Basin: An integrated seismic study: Expl. Geophys., 29, 384-390.
  7. Goncharov, A.G., Lizinsky, M. D., Collins, C.D.N., Kalnin, K.A., Fomin, T.N., Drummond, B.J., Goleby, B.R.G. and Platonenkova, L.N., 1998b, Intra-crustal "seismic isostasy" in the Baltic Shield and Australian Precambrian Cratons from deep seismic profiles and the Kola superdeep bore hole data, in Braun, J., Dooley, J., Goleby, B., Van der Hilst, R. and Klootwijk, C, Eds, Structure and evolution of the Australian continent: Geodynamics Series, 26, 119-138.
  8. Pylypenko,V.N., 1982, Continuation of the wave field by the differential grid solution of the wave equation, in: Alekseyev, A.S., Ed., Application of numerical methods in studies of the lithosphere, Novosibirsk, Siberian Branch of the Academy of Sciences USSR, 144-154. (in Russian)
  9. Riznichenko, Yu.V., 1946, Geometrical seismics in layered media, in: Proceedings of the Institute of Theoretical Geophysics, 2/1.
  10. Zelt, C.A. and Smith, R.B., 1992, Seismic travel time inversion for 2-D crustal velocity structure: Geophys. J. Internat., 108, 16-34.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG00347
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error