1887
Volume 31, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Transmission seismic imaging, popularly known as tomography, provides a means of estimation of velocity distribution in the subsurface by inverting or -wave data, from either time of arrival or full waveform. The accuracy and resolution of the tomographic reconstruction depends both on the data acquisition geometry and the inversion algorithm used. In many practical applications such as cross-borehole tomography, a limited range of viewing angles and ray density coverage results in nonunique solutions. The number of raypaths and sampling density differ enormously for various acquisition geometries used to record seismic arrivals. Individually, crosshole or vertical seismic profiling (VSP) data suffer from incompleteness. But a combined crosshole-VSP data interpretation can overcome this limitation, as explored in the present paper. Since finding the optimal solution, even from poor initial models, is extremely important in subsurface imaging, global optimisation using simulated evolution for the traveltime inversion is proposed in this paper. Genetic algorithm and evolutionary programming, the two main avenues of simulated evolution, are implemented for the tomographic applications. The potential of these methods is demonstrated on a number of numerical examples of which the results of an ‘L’-shaped anomalous zone in a low velocity medium and two voids embedded in a high velocity host rock are presented here. The velocity tomograms of the first model present a somewhat distorted image evolved from VSP and crosshole data using the genetic algorithm approach. A combined crosshole-VSP traveltime inversion by both genetic algorithm and evolutionary programming gave solutions close to the actual models, the resolution by genetic algorithm being better than that of evolutionary programming. Similar results are also observed for the other model from crosshole-VSP combined interpretation. Shear-wave seismic tomographic surveys were conducted at North Searsole colliery, Raniganj Coalfield, India to detect abandoned galleries in coal seams for the purpose of stabilisation. The proposed simulated evolution tomographic imaging schemes have been applied for the traveltime inversion of VSP, crosshole and crosshole-VSP combined data to estimate -wave velocity distribution in the subsurface region between the boreholes NS-002 and NS-003. It is found that -wave velocity variation ranges between 0.1 - 1.6 km/s by both genetic algorithm and evolutionary programming schemes when crosshole-VSP data are interpreted together, and between 0.4 - 1.6 km/s by VSP and 0.5 - 1.6 km/s by crosshole tomography. Thus individual tomographic imaging (crosshole/VSP) underestimated -wave velocity variation in the region. The low shear-wave velocity zones estimated as 0.12 km/s by genetic algorithm and 0.32 km/s by evolutionary programming for crosshole-VSP data could be detected at a depth of 30 - 36 m in the Kenda Bottom coal seam. As validated by the existing mine plan, these low velocity zones are the probable galleries in the coal seam. Traces of the Kenda Top and the Kenda Bottom coal seams could also be delineated by these schemes. Although the extreme heterogeneity associated with these coal mine workings poses a challenge to the accurate image reconstruction, the simulated evolution algorithms when implemented for the combined crosshole-VSP data inversion yield better subsurface resolution.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG00552
2000-09-01
2026-01-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Billington, S., Swanson, P. L., Boler, F. M., and Estey, L. H., 1992, A 2-D P-wave velocity tomographic experiment in a deep mine: Workshop on Induced Seismicity, 33rd U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Int. Soc. Rock Mech., Paper in Pre-Workshop Volume, p.1.
  2. Bois, P., Laparte, M., and Thomas, G., 1972, Well to well seismic measurements: Geophysics, 37, 471-480.
  3. Bregman, N. D., Bailey, R. C., and Chapman, C. H., 1989, Crosshole seismic tomography: Geophysics, 54, 200-215.
  4. Chakraborty, S., Nath, S. K., and Sengupta, S., 1998, Seismic Transmission Tomography - A configurative approach: Acta Geophysica Polonica, XLVI (4), 389-410.
  5. Cumerlato, C. L., Stachura, V. J., and Tweeton, D. R., 1988, Application of Refraction Tomography to Map the Extent of Blast-Induced Fracturing, in. P.A. Cundall, R. L. Sterling, and A.M. Starfield, Eds, Key Questions in Rock Mechanics: Balkema, Rotterdam, 691-698.
  6. Dennen, R. S., and Stroud, W. P., 1991. Radar Hazard Detection in a coal structure: Mining Engineering, 34, 413-418.
  7. Dines, K. A., and Lytle, R. J., 1979, Computerized geophysical tomography: Proc. IEEE 67, 1065-1073.
  8. Fogel, D. B., 1991, Systematic identification through simulated evolution: A machine learning approach to modelling: Ginn Press, MA.
  9. Goldberg, D. E., 1989, Genetic algorithms in search optimisation and machine learning: Addison-Wesley publ. Co., second edition.
  10. Holland, J. H., 1975, Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems: Univ. of Michigan Press, Ann. Arbor.
  11. Iyer, H. M., and Hirahara, K., 1993, Seismic Tomography - Theory and Practice: Chapman and Hall, first edition.
  12. Kak, A. C., and Slaney, M., 1985, Principles of computerised tomographic imaging, IEEE Press.
  13. Matsuoka, T., and Ezaka, T., 1992, Ray tracing using reciprocity: Geophysics, 57, 326-333.
  14. Mcmechan, G. A., 1983, Seismic tomography on boreholes: Geophys. J. Roy. Astr. Soci., 74, 601-612.
  15. Mcmechan, G. A., Harris, J. M., and Anderson, L. M., 1987, Crosshole tomography for strongly variable media with applications to scale model data: Bull., Seis. Soc. Am., 77, 1945-1960.
  16. Nath, S. K., Majumdar, S., and Sengupta, S., 1993, Finite element simulation of two dimensional seismic wave propagation: Computers and Structures, 49, 97-106.
  17. Nath, S. K., Singh, S. K., Pani, A., and Sengupta, S., 1997, Forward modelling in Cross-hole seismic tomography using reciprocity: Computers and Structures, 63, 1-15.
  18. Nolet, G., 1987, Seismic Tomography with Applications in Global Seismology and Exploration Geophysics: D. Reidel Publ. Co.
  19. Pratt, R. G., Mcgaughey, W. J., and Chapman, C. H., 1993, Anisotropic velocity tomography: A case study in a near-surface rock mass: Geophysics, 58, 1748-1763.
  20. Radon, J., 1917, Uber die Bestimmung von Functionen Durch Ihre Integralwerte Langs Gewisser Mannigfaltigkeiten: Ber. Verh. Saechs. Akad. Wiss., 69, 262-267.
  21. Schneider, W. A., Ranzinger, K. A., Balch, A. H., and Kruse, C., 1992, A dynamic programming approach to first arrival traveltime computation in media with arbitrarily distributed velocities: Geophysics, 57, 39-50.
  22. Seguin, M. K., Sen, N. and Gupta, O. P., 1992-1995, Project on Identification and Delineation of abandoned unknown and unsurveyed underground colliery workings in Raniganj Coalfields Geophysical Studies: IDRC-MGMICMPDIL 1st-4th annual project reports of Coal S&T and IDRC project.
  23. Sen, M., and Stoffa, P. L., 1995, Global optimisation methods in geophysical inversion: Elsevier Science.
  24. Singh, S. K., Nath, S. K., Ganguly, N., Chakraborty, S., and Sengupta, S., 1997, Cross-hole Seismic Tomography by Evolutionary Programming: Indian Journal of Petroleum Geology, 6, 77-86.
  25. Vasco, D. W., 1991, Boundary seismic velocities using a tomographic method: Geophysics, 56, 472-482.
  26. Witten, A. J., and King, W. C., 1990, Acoustic imaging of subsurface features: Journal of Environmental Engineering, ASCE, 116, 116-181.
  27. Wong, J., Hurley, P., and West, G. F., 1983, Crosshole and seismic imaging in crystalline rocks: Geophys. Res. Lett., 10, 686-689.
  28. Worthington, M., 1984, An introduction to geophysical tomography: First Break, 2, 20-27.
  29. Yamamoto, T., Nye, T., and Kuru, M., 1994, Porosity, permeability, shear strength: Cross-hole tomography below an iron foundry: Geophysics, 59, 1530-1541.
  30. Zhang, J., and McMechan, G. A., 1994, 3-D transmission tomography using wide aperture data for velocity estimation of irregular salt bodies: Geophysics, 59, 1620-1630.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG00552
Loading

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error