1887
Volume 32, Issue 3-4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Exploration for nickel sulphides has often involved the application of airborne electromagnetic data. Some of the early successes of the technique were in Canada in the 1950s, detecting shallow massive sulphides in highly resistive host stratigraphies. As exploration for deeper deposits under cover proliferates, a comparison of different systems and an analysis of the depth of penetration of these systems is required.

An examination of field data from three known nickel sulphide deposits shows that the target anomalies are all above the noise level except where shielded by a flat-lying conductor. Using the geological models for each deposit, forward modelling was applied to determine that the ore bodies chosen for this study could be buried deeper before the system used would cease to be an effective exploration tool. Forward modelling also shows that all methods examined are able to identify the target. Systems with lower base frequency and wider transmitter pulse give the best results.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG01136
2001-09-01
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Evans, D., 1998, BHP Internal Company Memo No. CM849, To Nickel Working Group, February 1998.
  2. Leggatt, P.B., Klinkert, PS., Hage, T.B., 2000, The Spectrem airborne electromagnetic system - further developments, Geophysics 65, 1976-1982.
  3. OGS, 2000, Report on Matheson Airborne Geophysical Survey, Geophysical data set 1101, Ontario Geological survey, Sudbury, October 2000.
  4. Peters, B., and Buck, P, 2000, The Maggie Hays and Emily Ann Nickel Deposits, Western Australia: A Geophysical Case History, Exploration Geophysics 31, 210- 221.
  5. Raiche, A., 1998, Modelling the time-domain response of AEM systems, Exploration Geophysics 29, 103-106.
  6. Reford, S. and Fyon, A., 2000, Reid-Mahaffy airborne geophysical test site survey miscellaneous release - data (MRD) 55: Geological setting, measured and processed data, and derived products, Ontario Geological survey, Sudbury, October 2000.
  7. Smith, R.S. and Annan, A.P, 1998, The use of B-field measurements in an airborne time-domain system: Part 1. Benefits of B-field versus dB/dt data, Exploration Geophysics 29, 24-29.
  8. Smith, R.S., Annan, A.P, Me Gowan, P.D., 2001, A comparison of data from airborne, semi-airborne, and ground electromagnetic systems, Geophysics 32, in press.
  9. Stolz, E., 2000, Electromagnetic methods applied to exploration for deep nickel sulphides in the Leinster area, Western Australia, Exploration Geophysics 31, 222-228.
  10. Wolfgram, P. and Thomson, S., 1998, The use of B-field measurements in an airborne time-domain system - Part II: examples in conductive regimes, Exploration Geophysics 29, 225-229.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG01136
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Airborne electromagnetic; Nickel sulphide

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error