1887
Volume 33, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Seismic tomography techniques based on first break time inversion are a convenient way to recover velocity fields. However, these techniques only use a small fraction of the available seismogram data. Migration uses entire reflection seismograms but stops short of an actual inversion, using a summing/averaging method. The result is a smeared image of diffractor points, which makes it difficult to image weaker events.

In this paper we develop a seismic inversion technique to recover diffractors and reflectors from full-waveform seismograms by direct inversion, rather than a migration-based approach. We choose a simple, idealised modelling scheme to highlight the basic advantages and limitations inherent in this class of inversion techniques, and derive several important and generic guidelines applicable to the design and development of full-waveform-based inversion algorithms.

We propose a modelling scheme for diffractions, reflections and refractions in an arbitrary velocity field. By using a sourcewavelet based estimation method, we linearise the forward model and are able to obtain a diffractor/reflector field recovery scheme that is based on standard iterative matrix inversion.

Our investigation reveals that the algorithm provides vastly superior resolution of the structure compared to time-of-flight tomography and requires only a surprisingly small number of sources and receivers for successful operation. However, it is highly prone to noise capture, where noise is any system unknown. This translates into inaccuracies in the macro-velocity field estimate and the seismic wave amplitudes. Our experiments show that the background velocity field must be known with an accuracy of better than 1%, suggesting that this class of linearised inversion scheme is unsuitable for field data sets. Nevertheless, the scheme highlights the pitfalls of any full-waveform inversion approach, where without careful calibration, wavefield dynamics can easily be mis-inverted to produce spurious structure.

© 2002 ASEG
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG02001
2002-03-01
2026-01-23

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1071/EG02001
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bleistein, N., and Hagin, F.G., 1987, Two-and one-half dimensional Born inversion with an arbitrary reference: Geophysics, 52, 26-36.
  2. Bregman, N., Bailey, R.C., and Chapman, C.H., 1989, Traveltime and amplitude inversion in crosshole seismology: J. Geophys. Res., 94, 7577-7587.
  3. Cao, S., and Greenhalgh, S.A., 1993, Calculation of the seismic first-break time field and its raypath distribution using a minimum traveltime tree algorithm: Geophys. J. Int. 114, 593-600
  4. Cao, S., and Greenhalgh, S.A., 1994, Finite-difference solution of the eikonal equation using an efficient, first-arrival wavefront tracking scheme: Geophysics 59, 632-643.
  5. Cao, S., and Greenhalgh, S.A., 1995, Relative-error based non-linear inversion: application to seismic traveltime tomography: Geophys. J. Int. 121, 684-694.
  6. Carroll, S., and Beresford, G., 1997, Techniques to improve imaging of seismic tomographic data: Expl. Geophys. 28, 369-378.
  7. Coultrip, R.L., 1993, High-accuracy wavefront tracking traveltime calculation: Geophysics 58, 284-292.
  8. Dickens, T.A., 1994, Study of diffraction tomography for layered backgrounds: Geophysics 59, 694-706.
  9. Gan, H., Levin, P.L., and Ludwig, R, 1993, Finite element formulation of acoustic scattering with absorbing boundary conditions in the frequency domain: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 94, 1651-1661.
  10. Gan, H., Ludwig, R., and Levin, P.L., 1994, Non-linear diffraction inverse scattering for multiple scatterers I inhomogeneous acoustic background media: J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 764-776.
  11. Gelius, L.J., 1995, Limited-view diffraction tomography in a non-uniform background: Geophysics 60, 580-588.
  12. Geoltrain, S., and Brac, J., 1993, Can we image complex structures with first-arrival traveltime: Geophysics 58, 564-575.
  13. Greenhalgh, S.A., and Gruber, T., 2002, Sensitivity analysis of velocity field recovery, Pure and Appl. Geophys. (submitted)
  14. Gruber, T., 1998, Crosshole seismic tomography incorporating later arrivals: PhD thesis, University of Adelaide (unpublished).
  15. Gruber, T., and Greenhalgh, S.A., 1998, Precision analysis of first break times in grid models: Geophysics 63, 1062-1065.
  16. Kagansky, A., and Loewenthal., D., 1993, Estimation of a point source wavelet in elastic media: Geophysics 58, 1195-1199.
  17. Khali, A.A., Stewart, R.R., and Henley, D.C., 1993, Full-waveform processing and interpretation of kilohertz crosswell seismic data: Geophysics 58, 1248-1256.
  18. Mora, P., 1989, Inversion = migration + tomography, Geophysics 54, 1575-1586.
  19. Moser, T.J., 1994, Migration using the shortest path method: Geophysics 59, 1110-1120.
  20. Nolet, G. (Ed.), 1987, Seismic Tomography: D. Reidel Publishing Co., Dordrecht, Holland.
  21. Pai, D.M., 1990, Crosshole seismic using vertical eigenstates: Geophysics 55, 815-820.
  22. Pratt, R.G., and Worthington, M.H., 1988, The application of diffraction tomography to crosshole seismic data: Geophysics 53, 1284-1294.
  23. Pratt, R.G., and Goulty, N.R., 1991, Combining wave-equation imaging with traveltime tomography to form high-resolution images from crosshole data: Geophysics 56, 208-224.
  24. Pratt, R.G., Song, Z.M., Williamson, P., and Warner, M.,1996, Two-dimensional velocity models from wide-angle seismic data by wavefield inversion: Geophys. J. Int. 124, 323-34.
  25. Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A., and Vetterling, W.T., 1986, Numerical Recipes: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 818pp.
  26. Reiter, D.T., and Rodi, W., 1996, Non-linear waveform tomography applied to crosshole seismic data: Geophysics 61, 902-913.
  27. Schuster, G.T., and Quintus-Bosz, A., 1993, Wavepath eikonal traveltime inversion: theory: Geophysics 58, 1314-1323.
  28. Song, Z.M., Williamson, P., and Pratt, R.G., 1995, Frequency-domain acoustic wave modelling and inversion of crosshole data: Part II - Inversion method, synthetic experiments and real-data results: Geophysics 60, 796-809.
  29. Stewart, R.R., 1991, Exploration Seismic Tomography: Fundamentals: Soc. Expl. Geophys. Course Notes No. 3, Tulsa, 190 pp.
  30. Stolt, R.H., and Benson, A.K., 1986, Seismic Migration - Theory and Practice: Geophysical Press.
  31. Tura, A.C., Johnson, L.R., Majer, E.L., and Peterson, J.E., 1992, Application of diffraction tomography to fracture detection, Geophysics 57, 245-257.
  32. Williamson, P.R., 1991, A guide to the limits of resolution imposed by scattering in ray tomography: Geophysics 56, 15-26.
  33. Williamson, P.R., and Pratt, R.G., 1995, A critical review of the acoustic wave modelling procedure in 2.5 dimensions: Geophysics 60, 591-595.
  34. Woodward, M., 1992, Wave-equation tomography, Geophysics 57, 15-26.
  35. Worthington, M.H., 1984, An introduction to geophysical tomography: First Break 2, No. 11, 20-26.
  36. Wu, R., and Toksoz, M.N., 1987, Diffraction tomography and multi-source holography applied to seismic imaging: Geophysics 52, 11-25.
  37. Zhou, B., Greenhalgh, S.A., and Sinadinovski, C., 1992, Iterative algorithm for the damped minimum norm and constrained problem in seismic tomography: Expl. Geophys. 23, 497-505.
  38. Zhou, B., and Greenhalgh, S.A., 1998, Crosshole acoustic velocity imaging with fullwaveform spectral data: 2.5-D simulations: Expl. Geophys. 29, 680-684.
  39. Zhou, C.X., Cai, W.Y., Luo, Y., Schuster, G.T., and Hassanzadeh, S., 1995, Acoustic wave-equation traveltime and waveform inversion of crosshole seismic data: Geophysics 60, 765-773.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG02001
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): diffractors; later arrivals; seismic inversion; waveform tomography

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error