1887
Volume 34, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

In this paper, the radial basis function neural network (RBFN) is used to predict reservoir log properties from seismic attributes, and is compared to the generalized regression neural network (GRNN), discussed by Hampson et al. (2001). Both of these methods are related to the probabilistic neural network (PNN), which uses a Gaussian kernel estimator based on the distance between points in seismic attribute space. Our goal was to see if there are situations in which the RBFN could improve on the results found using the GRNN. The methodology consisted of first training the neural network at each well location, to find the optimum set of seismic attributes and weighting coefficients, and then applying the trained network to a 3D seismic volume. Each neural network was applied to the Blackfoot 3D seismic volume, which was recorded over a Cretaceous channel sand in central Alberta. Our results showed that, although the training results were quite close for each method, the RBFN approach generally produced higher-frequency results, especially as the number of training values was reduced. By computing the least-squared error between the predicted samples and the known training samples, we were also able to demonstrate the improvement of the results of RBFN over GRNN as the number of training samples decreased.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG03015
2003-03-01
2026-01-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bishop, C. M., 1995, Neural Networks for Pattern Recognition: Oxford University Press.
  2. Castagna, J. P., and Backus, M. M., 1993, Offset-Dependent Reflectivity - Theory and Practice of AVO Analysis: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  3. Hampson, D., Schuelke, J. S., and Quirein, J. A., 2001, Use of multiattribute transforms to predict log properties from seismic data: Geophysics, 66, 220-231.
  4. Kohonen, T., 2001, Self Organizing Maps: Springer Series in Information Sciences, 20, Springer Verlag.
  5. Masters, T., 1995, Advanced Algorithms for Neural Networks: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
  6. Nadaraya, E. A., 1964, On estimating regression: Theory of Probability and its Applications, 9, 55-59.
  7. Poggio, T., and Girosi, F., 1990, Networks for approximation and learning: Proceedings of the IEEE, 78, 1481-1497.
  8. Powell, M. J.D., 1987, Radial basis functions for multivariable interpolation: a review: In Mason, J. C., and Cox, M. G., (Eds.), Algorithms for Approximation: Clarendon Press, pp143-167.
  9. Ronen, S., Schultz, P. S., Hattori, M., and Corbett, C., 1994, Seismic-guided estimation of log properties, Parts 1, 2, and 3: The Leading Edge, 13, 305-310, 674-678, and 770-776.
  10. Russell, B. and Hampson, D., 1991, A comparison of post-stack seismic inversion methods: 61st Ann. International Meeting: SEG, 876-878.
  11. Russell, B., Hampson D. P., Lines L. R., and Todorov, T., 2001, Combining geostatistics and multiattribute transforms - A channel sand case study: CREWES Research Report, 13, 827-842.
  12. Russell, B.H, Lines, L. R., and Ross, C. P., 2002, AVO classification using neural networks: A comparison of two methods: CREWES Research Report, 14.
  13. Specht, D. F., 1990, Probabilistic neural networks: Neural Networks, 3, 109-118.
  14. Taner, M. T., Koehler, F., and Sheriff, R. E., 1979, Complex seismic trace analysis: Geophysics, 44, 1041-1063.
  15. Watson, G. S., 1964, Smooth regression analysis: Sankhya, the Indian Journal of Statistics. Series A, 26, 359-372.
  16. Yilmaz, O., 1987, Seismic Data Processing: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG03015
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): neural network; reservoir properties; seismic attributes

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error