1887
Volume 34, Issue 1-2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Airborne electromagnetic (AEM) systems are increasingly being used for mapping conductivity in areas susceptible to secondary salinity, with particular attention to near-surface predictions (conductivities in the top 5 or 10 metres). Because measured AEM response is strongly dependent on the height of both the transmitter loop and receiver coil above conductive material, errors in measurements of terrain clearance translate directly into significant errors in predicted near-surface conductivity.

Radar altimetry has been the standard in airborne geophysical systems for measuring terrain clearance. In areas of agricultural activity, artefacts up to five metres in magnitude can be present. One class of error, found to correlate with ploughed paddocks and hence termed the "paddock effect", results in overestimation of terrain clearance. It is hypothesised that this is due to surface roughness and soil moisture levels in these paddocks. A second class of error, related to dense vegetation and hence termed the "canopy effect", results in underestimation of terrain clearance.

A survey example where terrain clearance was measured using both a radar and a laser altimeter illustrates the consequences of the paddock and canopy effects on shallow conductivity predictions. This shows that the combination, of the dependence of AEM response on terrain clearance and systematic radar altimeter artefacts spatially coincident with areas of differing land-use, may falsely imply that land-use practices are the controlling influence on conductivity variations in the near surface.

A laser altimeter is recommended for AEM applications because this device is immune to the paddock effect. Careful processing is still required to minimise canopy effects.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG03077
2003-03-01
2026-01-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Beamish, D., 2002, The canopy effect in airborne EM: Geophysics, 67, 1720-1728.
  2. Lane, R., Green, A., Golding, C., Owers, M., Pik, P., Plunkett, C., Sattel, D., and Thorn, B., 2000, An example of 3D conductivity mapping using the TEMPEST airborne electromagnetic system: Exploration Geophysics, 31, 162-172.
  3. Markham, K. J., and Morris, W. A., 2002, Creating and correcting a digital terrain elevation model using radar altimetry and GPS data acquired from aeromagnetic surveys: in Proceedings of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA: Environmental and Engineering Geophysical Society, Poster P7.
  4. Macnae, J. C., King, A., Stolz, N., Osmakoff, A., and Blaha, A., 1998, Fast AEM data processing and inversion: Exploration Geophysics, 29, 163-169.
  5. Richardson, L. M., 2000, Errors in digital elevation models derived from airborne geophysical data: Australian Geological Survey Organisation Record 2000/37.
  6. Stone, P. M., and Simsky, A., 2001, Constructing high resolution DEMs from airborne laser scanner data: 15th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists: Extended Abstracts.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG03077
Loading

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error