1887
Volume 34, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

We evaluate the in situ stress field and consequent risk of fault reactivation in the Bight Basin in order to assess the risk of fault seal breach at seismically mapped prospects. Borehole breakouts interpreted from dipmeter and image logs in five wells in and around the Bight Basin indicate a 130° maximum horizontal stress orientation. The large variation in water depths across the Bight Basin requires the use of effective stress magnitudes. We use a depth-stress power relationship to define the effective vertical stress based on density log data from 10 wells. The effective minimum horizontal stress gradient is estimated at 6 MPa/km using effective pressures from leak-off tests. We determine an upper bound (18.7 MPa/km) for the effective maximum horizontal stress gradient, using frictional limits to stress. The upper bound to the effective maximum horizontal stress indicates the region is in a strike-slip faulting stress regime. However, a normal faulting stress regime cannot be ruled out. Pore pressure in wells in the region is hydrostatic except in Greenly 1 where mild overpressure occurs below a depth of 3600 m.

We use the FAST technique to evaluate the risk of fault reactivation in the Bight Basin. The risk of fault reactivation and consequent seal breach is expressed in terms of the pore pressure increase that would be required to induce failure. We consider three different stress regimes. These include a strike-slip faulting stress regime, a normal faulting stress regime, and a case on the boundary of strike-slip and normal faulting stress regimes. In all three cases, faults striking 40° (±15°) of any dip are the least likely to be reactivated.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG03174
2003-06-01
2026-01-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barton, C.A., Zoback, M.D., and Moos, D., 1995, Fluid flow along potentially active faults in crystalline rock: Geology, 23, 683–686.
  2. Bell, J.S., 1990, The stress regime of the Scotian Shelf offshore eastern Canada to 6 kilometres depth and implications for rock mechanics and hydrocarbon migration: in Maury, V. and Fourmaintraux, D. (eds.), Rock at Great Depth, Rotterdam, Balkema, 1243–1265.
  3. Bell, J.S. and Gough, D.I., 1979, Northeast-southwest compressive stress in Alberta - evidence from oil wells: Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 45, 475–482.
  4. Breckels, I.M. and van Eekelen, H.A.M., 1982, Relationship between horizontal stress and depth in sedimentary basins: Journal of Petroleum Technology, 34, 2191–2198.
  5. Dewhurst, D.N., Yang, Y., and Aplin, A.C., 1999, Permeability and fluid flow in natural mudstones: in Aplin, A.C., Fleet, A.J., and Macquaker, J.H.S. (eds.), Mud and Mudstones: Physical and Fluid Flow Properties: Special Publication 158, Geological Society, London, 23–43.
  6. Dickson, G., 1953, Geological aspects of abnormal reservoir pressures in Gulf Coast Louisiana: AAPG Bull., 37, 410–432.
  7. Finkbeiner, T., Zoback, M., Flemings, P., and Stump, B., 2001, Stress, pore pressure, and dynamically constrained hydrocarbon columns in the South Eugene Island 330 field, northern Gulf of Mexico: AAPG Bull., 85, 1007–1031.
  8. Gaarenstroom, L., Tromp, R.A.J., Jong, M.C.D., and Brandenburg, A.M., 1993, Overpressures in the Central North Sea: implications for trap integrity and drilling safety: in Parker, J. R. (eds.), Petroleum Geology of Northwest Europe: Proceedings of the 4th Conference: 2. Geological Society, London, 1305–1313.
  9. Hillis, R.R., 1998, Mechanisms of dynamic seal failure in the Timor Sea and Central North Sea Basins: in Purcell, P.G. and Purcell, R.R. (eds.), The Sedimentary Basins of Western Australia 2. Proceedings of the Petroleum Exploration Society of Australia Symposium, Perth, Western Australia, 313–324.
  10. Hillis, R.R. and Reynolds, S.D., 2000, The Australian Stress Map: J. geol. Soc. Lond., 157, 915–921.
  11. Ludwig, W.J., Nafe, J.E., and Drake, C.L., 1970, Seismic Refraction: in Maxwell, A.E. (ed.), The Sea: Ideas and Observations on Progress in the Study of the Seas, Vol. 4: New Concepts of Sea Floor Evolution. Wiley-Interscience, 53–84.
  12. Mildren, S.D., Hillis, R.R., and Kaldi, J., 2002, Calibrating predictions of fault seal reactivation in the Timor Sea: APPEA J., 42, 187–202.
  13. Plumb, R.A. and Hickman, S.H., 1985, Stress-induced borehole elongation: A comparison between the Four-Arm Dipmeter and the Borehole Televiewer in the Auburn Geothermal Well: J. Geophys. Res., 90, 5513–5521.
  14. Reynolds, S.D. and Hillis, R.R., 2000, The in situ stress field of the Perth Basin, Australia: Geophys. Res. Lett., 27, 3421–3424.
  15. Sibson, R.H., 1974, Frictional constraints on thrust, wrench and normal faults: Nature, 249, 542–544.
  16. Sibson, R.H., 1994, Crustal stress, faulting and fluid flow: in Parnell, J. (ed.), Geofluids: Origin, Migration and Evolution of Fluids in Sedimentary Basins: Special Publication 78. Geological Society, London, 69–84.
  17. Somerville, R., 2001, The Ceduna Sub-basin – A snapshot of prospectivity: APPEA J., 41, 321–346.
  18. Zoback, M.D. and Healy, J.H., 1984, Friction, faulting and in situ stress: Annales Geophysicae, 2, 689–698.
  19. Zoback, M.D., Moos, D., Mastin, L., and Anderson, R.N., 1985, Well bore breakouts and in situ stress: J. Geophys. Res., 90, 5523–5530.
  20. Zoback, M.L., 1992, First- and second-order patterns of stress in the lithosphere: The world stress map project: J. Geophys. Res., 97, 11703–11728.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG03174
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Bight Basin; FAST; fault reactivation; seal integrity; stress field

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error