1887
Volume 34, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

As mineral exploration activity shifts to regions at low magnetic latitudes, interpretation skills acquired at high latitudes become harder to apply, thus leading to under-utilisation of expensive magnetic survey data.

Changes in anomaly shape, reduction in overall amplitude, and changes in map textures make the ready interpretation of geology from magnetic data difficult. These problems are worst for magnetic inclinations within 20° of the equator.

Reduction to pole (RTP) is the best theoretical solution because it normalizes the effect of induced magnetization and strike on the shape of the magnetic anomaly while preserving dip and textural information (the “normal” magnetization and ambient field direction being the vertical). However, in practice, the standard RTP transform is difficult to apply at very low latitudes and produces variable-quality maps, sometimes dominated by declination-parallel artefacts. Additionally, the transform cannot completely reconstruct north-south trending anomalies.

The 3D Analytic Signal is a function of magnetic gradients and is easy to compute at all latitudes. The magnitude or amplitude of the 3D Analytic Signal can be computed easily and accurately for any ambient and source magnetization and can be readily imaged. The magnitude is almost, but not entirely, independent of magnetization direction. However, it lacks the resolution that horizontal and vertical gradient maps provide, and lacks the dip (and therefore structural) and textural information that total magnetic intensity and RTP maps contain.

Although neither is the perfect solution, both transformations are of use, particularly at low latitudes. In this paper, I illustrate their differences, advantages, and disadvantages.

© 2003 ASEG
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG03257
2003-09-01
2026-01-12

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1071/EG03257
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Baranov, V., and Naudy, H., 1964, Numerical calculation of the formula for reduction to the magnetic pole: Geophysics, 22, 359–383.
  2. Blakely, R.J., 1995, Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Grant, F.S., and Dodds, J., 1972, MAGMAP FFT processing system development notes: Paterson, Grant and Watson Limited.
  4. Hansen, R.O., and Pawlowski, R.S., 1989, Reduction to the pole at low latitudes using Wiener filtering: Geophysics, 54, 1607–1613.
  5. Hsu, S.-K., Coppens, D., and Shyu, C.-T., 1998, Depth to magnetic source using the generalized analytic signal: Geophysics, 63, 1947–1957.
  6. Keating, P., and Zerbo, L., 1996, An improved technique for reduction to the pole at low latitudes: Geophysics, 61, 131–137.
  7. MacLeod, I.N., Jones, K., and Ting Fan Dai, 1993, 3-D Analytic Signal in the interpretation of total magnetic field data at low magnetic latitudes: Exploration Geophysics, 24, 679–688.
  8. Nabighian, M.N., 1972, The analytic signal of two-dimensional magnetic bodies with polygonal cross-section: its properties and use for automated anomaly interpretation: Geophysics, 37, 507–517.
  9. Nabighian, M.N., 1984, Toward a generalized three-dimensional automatic interpretation of potential field data via generalized Hilbert transforms: fundamental relations: Geophysics, 49, 780–786.
  10. Pearson, W.C., and Skinner, C.M., 1982, Reduction-to-the-pole of low latitude magnetic anomalies: Abstracts, Fifty-second Annual SEG International Meeting and Exposition, 356–158.
  11. Phillips, J.D., 1997, U.S. Geological Survey Potential-Field Geophysical Software for the PC, Version 2.2: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 97-725. [Web document]: Accessed 10 May, 2002. Available at <:ftp://greenwood.cr. usgs.gov/pub/open-file-reports/ofr?97?0725/pfofr.htm>.
  12. Rajagopalan, S., 1989, Aeromagnetic interpretation of the Kanmantoo Group, South Australia: Ph. D. thesis, University of Adelaide.
  13. Rajagopalan, S., 1997, The 3D Analytic Signal: A creative solution or a waste of time?: Preview, 66, 63–64.
  14. Roy, A., 1962, Ambiguity in geophysical interpretation: Geophysics, 27, 90–99.
  15. Silva, J.B.C., 1986, Reduction to the pole as an inverse problem and its application to low latitude anomalies: Geophysics, 51, 369–382.
  16. Xia, J., Sprowl, D.R., and Adkins-Heljeson, D., 1993, Correction of topographic distortions in potential-field data: A fast and accurate approach: Geophysics, 58, 515–523.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG03257
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Analytic signal; latitudes; low magnetic; reduction to pole

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error