1887
Volume 35, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

A comparison of first-arrival times obtained by both finite-difference and ray trace modelling demonstrates the applicability of ray tracing to shallow refraction interpretation. Most shallow seismic refraction interpretations are still achieved with conventional time-term methods and those, such as the GRM, that are derived from these methods. In complex conditions, these methods are inaccurate, as many first-arrivals originate from diffracted waves and waves that have laterally penetrated irregular refractors. These processes also affect first-arrival amplitudes, as is demonstrated with an irregular finite-difference model; nevertheless, first-arrival times are still primarily used in shallow refraction interpretation.

An interactive ray-trace modelling method, based on two-point ray tracing through a discrete, two-dimensional model with constant velocity compartments and incorporating buried diffraction sources, is used to compute accurate first-arrival-times. This method is designed for checking and refining interpretations in pre-selected areas, rather than as a production tool for routine processing of large refraction data sets. Implementation of the method on a PC using screen displays of first-arrival ray paths, and field and synthetic arrival time data, allows inappropriate arrivals caused by model deficiencies to be recognised and eliminated. Model adjustments are made directly on the screen and are guided by their effect on computed times and the agreement with field times. The improved algorithms and interactive steps of the visual interactive ray trace (VIRT) modelling eliminate instabilities that occur with many automated, ray-based inversion methods and inaccuracies arising from use of oversimplified or inaccurate initial seismic models. This interpretation method is a powerful teaching tool that readily highlights model and data deficiencies and can generate robust models for automated inversion.

The VIRT method is applied to re-interpret shallow refraction data from the London-Victoria shallow gold deposit occurring in a major fault zone. The final model obtained with VIRT agreed closely with known geology and showed that the gold mineralisation occurs in a higher-velocity region within the weathered rock above a lower-velocity region in the underlying bedrock.

© 2006 ASEG
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG04116
2004-06-01
2026-01-18

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1071/EG04116
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ackermann, H.D., Pankratz, L.W., and Dansereau D., 1982, A comprehensive system for interpreting seismic refraction arrival-time data using interactive computer methods: USGS Open File Report 82-1065.
  2. Ackermann, H.D., Pankratz, L.W., and Dansereau D., 1986, Resolution of ambiguities of shallow refraction travel-time curves: Geophysics, 5, 223-235,
  3. Alterman, Z., and Karal, F.C., 1968, Propagation of elastic waves in layered media by finite difference methods: Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 58, 367-398,
  4. Barry, K.M., 1967, Delay-time and its application to refraction profile interpretation: in Musgrave, A.W. (ed.), Seismic Refraction Prospecting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, pp 348-361,
  5. Boschetti, R, and Moresi, L., 2001, Interactive inversion in geosciences: Geophysics, 66, 1226-1234.
  6. Cerveny, V., and Ravindra, R., 1971, Theory of Seismic Head Waves, Toronto Press,
  7. Dampney, C.N.G., and Whiteley, R.J., 1980, Velocity determination and error analysis for the shallow seismic refraction method: Geophysical Prospecting, 18, 2-17,
  8. Gerald, F.C., and Wheatley, P.O., 1983, Applied Numerical Analysis. 3rd ed.: Addison- Wesley,
  9. Govett, G.J.S., Dobos, V.J., and Smith, S., 1984, Exploration rock geochemistry for gold, Parkes, New South Wales, Australia: Journal of Geochemical Prospecting, 21, 175-191.
  10. Hampson, D., and Russell, B., 1984, First break interpretation using generalized linear inversion: J. Can. Soc. Expl. Geophys., 20, 40-54,
  11. Hatherly, P.J., 1982, Wave equation modelling for the shallow seismic refraction method. Exploration Geophysics, 13, 27-34,
  12. Hawkins, L.V., 1961, The Reciprocal method of routine shallow seismic refraction investigations: Geophysics, 26, 806-819.
  13. Hawkins, L.V., and Whiteley, R.J., 1980, Seismic signature of the Elura orebody, Cobar NSW: Exploration Geophysics, 7, 325-329.
  14. Hawkins, L.V., and Whiteley, R.J., 1981, Shallow seismic refraction survey of the Woodlawn orebody: in Whiteley, R.J., (ed.), Geophysical Case Study of the Woodlawn Orebody: Pergamon Press, pp 497-506,
  15. Heelan, PA., 1953, On the theory of head waves: Geophysics, 18, 871-893,
  16. Julian, B.R., and Gubbins, D., 1977, Three dimensional seismic ray tracing: Journal of Geophysics, 43, 95-113.
  17. Karal, F.C., and Keller, J.B., 1959, Elastic wave propagation in homogeneous and inhomogeneous media: Journal Acoustical Society of America, 31, 694-705,
  18. Leung, T.M., 1995, Examination of the optimum XY value by ray tracing: Geophysics, 40, 1151-1156
  19. Leung, T.M., 2003, Controls of traveltime data and problems with the generalized reciprocal method: Geophysics, 68, 1626-1632,
  20. Olsen, K.B., 1989, A stable and flexible procedure for the inverse modelling of seismic first arrivals: Geophysical Prospecting, 37, 445-65,
  21. Palmer, D., 1981, An introduction to the generalized reciprocal method of seismic refraction interpretation, Geophysics, 46, 1508-1518,
  22. Scott, J-, 1973, Seismic refraction modelling by computer, Geophysics, 38, 271-284,
  23. Slotnick, M.M., 1959, Lessons in seismic computing: Geyer, R.A., (ed.), Society of Exploration Geophysicists,
  24. Smith, D.N., and Ferguson, J.F, 2000, Constrained inversion of seismic refraction data using the controlled random search: Geophysics, 65, 1622-1630,
  25. Sjogren, B., 1979, Refractor velocity determination - cause and nature of some errors: Geophysical Prospecting, 27, 507-538,
  26. Sjogren, B., 2000, A brief study of the generalized reciprocal method and some limitations of the method: Geophysical Prospecting, 48, 815-834,
  27. Walker, C, Leung, T.M., Win, M.A., and Whiteley, R.J., 1991, Engineering seismic refraction: an improved field practice and a new interpretation method: Exploration Geophysics, 22, 423-26,
  28. White, D.E., 1989, Two-dimensional seismic refraction tomography: Geophysical Journal, 97, 223-245.
  29. Whiteley, R.J., 1990, Engineering geophysics - a geophysicist’s view: Exploration Geophysics, 21, 131-133.
  30. Whiteley, R.J., 1994, Seismic refraction testing - a tutorial: in Woods, R.D., (ed.), Geophysical Characterization of Sites: Oxford & IBH Publishing, pp 45-7,
  31. Whiteley, R.J., and Greenhalgh, S.A., 1979, Velocity inversion and the shallow seismic refraction method: Geoexploration, 17, 125-141,
  32. Whiteley, R.J., 2002, Shallow refraction interpretation in complex conditions with visual interactiveraytracing: 64th E.A.G.E. Conference &. Exhibition, paper PI55,
  33. Zang, J., and Tokso’z, M.N., 1998, Nonlinear refraction traveltime tomography: Geophysics, 63, 1726-1737.
  34. Zanzi, L., 1990, Inversion of refracted arrivals: a few problems: Geophysical Prospecting, 38, 339-364.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG04116
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): gold; interactive; modelling; ray tracing; refraction; seismic

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error