1887
Volume 35, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Mohr circles have recently been used as an aid in the analysis of the magnetotelluric (MT) impedance tensor. Although well known as a representation of the stress tensor in elasticity theory, the potential application of Mohr circles to MT data was virtually unrecognised by the geoelectromagnetic induction community until the pioneer paper of Lilley (1976). An important difference between the stress tensor and the MT tensor is that the former is real while the latter is complex, which means that the MT tensor must be represented by two Mohr circles rather than one. Although early discussions on the behaviour of MT data concentrated mainly on the real part of the MT tensor, it became necessary in more detailed treatments to consider both real and imaginary Mohr circles together. In particular, identification of seven independent invariants of the complex MT tensor as geometric invariants on a Mohr circle diagram, and their physical interpretation, required the two Mohr circles to be plotted together. A significant advance has been made with the introduction of the (real) phase tensor by Caldwell, Bibby, and Brown (2004). Although the phase tensor has only three independent invariants, it has been shown by Weaver, Agarwal, and Lilley (2003) that they retain the important physical properties of the seven invariants of the MT tensor introduced earlier but with the distinct advantage that they can be displayed graphically in a single Mohr circle diagram. In particular, identification of the dimensionality of the regional conductivity structure becomes a straightforward matter whether or not the data are distorted by near-surface conductivity anomalies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG04251
2004-12-01
2026-01-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bahr, K., 1988, Interpretation of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor: regional induction and local telluric distortion: Journal of Geophysics,62, 119-127.
  2. Bibby, H.M., 1986, Analysis of multiple-source bipole- quadrupole resistivity surveys using the apparent resistivity tensor: Geophysics,51, 972-983.
  3. Caldwell, T.G., Bibby, H.M., and Brown, C, 2002, The magnetotelluric phase tensor–a method of distortional analysis for 3D regional conductivity structures: 16th Workshop on Electromagnetic Induction in the Earth, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA, Abstract EM12-4.
  4. Caldwell, T.G., Bibby, H.M., and Brown, C, 2004, The magnetotelluric phase tensor: Geophysical Journal International,158, 457-469.
  5. Eggers, D.E., 1982, An eigenstate formulation of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor: Geophysics,47, 1204-1214.
  6. Jones, A.G., Kurtz, R.D., Oldenburg, D.W., Boerner, D.E., and Ellis, R., 1988, Magnetotelluric observations along the LITHOPROBE southeastern Canadian cordilleran transect: Geophysical Research Letters,15, 677-680.
  7. Lilley, F.E.M., 1976, Diagrams for magnetotelluric data: Geophysics,41, 766-779.
  8. Lilley, F.E.M., 1993a, Mohr circles in magnetotelluric interpretation (i) simple static shift; (ii) Bahr's analysis: Journal of Geomagnetism and Geoelectricity,45, 833-839.
  9. Lilley, F.E.M., 1993b, Three-dimensionality of the BC87 magnetotelluric data set studied using Mohr circles: Journal of Geomagnetism and Geo electricity,45, 1107-1113.
  10. Lilley, F.E.M., 1993c, Magnetotelluric analysis using Mohr circles: Geophysics,58, 1498-1506.
  11. Lilley, F.E.M., 1998a, Magnetotelluric tensor decomposition: Part I, Theory for a basic procedure: Geophysics,63, 1885-1897.
  12. Lilley, F.E.M., 1998b, Magnetotelluric tensor decomposition: Part II, Examples of a basic procedure: Geophysics,63, 1898-1907.
  13. Szarka, L., and Menvielle, M., 1997, Analysis of rotational invariants of the magnetotelluric impedance tensor: Geophysical Journal International,129, 133-142.
  14. Weaver, IT, Agarwal, A.K., and Lilley, F.E.M., 2000, Characterization of the magnetotelluric tensor in terms of its invariants: Geophysical Journal International,141, 321-336.
  15. Weaver, IT, Agarwal, A.K., and Lilley, F.E.M., 2003, The relationship between the magnetotelluric invariants and the phase tensor of Caldwell, Bibby and Brown: in Macnae, J., and Liu, G. (eds.), “Three-Dimensional Electromagnetics IIT”, Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, paper 43, 1-8.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG04251
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): impedance tensor; invariants; magnetotellurics; Mohr circles; phase tensor

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error