1887
Volume 36, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to describe a highly efficient common mid-point (CMP) data acquisition method for groundpenetrating radar (GPR) surveying, which is intended to widen the application of GPR. The most important innovation to increase the efficiency of CMP data acquisition is continuous monitoring of the GPR antenna positions, using a real-time kinematic Global Positioning System (RTK-GPS). Survey time efficiency is improved because the automatic antenna locating system that we propose frees us from the most time-consuming process – deployment of the antenna at specified positions. Numerical experiments predicted that the data density and the CMP fold would be increased by the increased efficiency of data acquisition, which results in improved signal-to-noise ratios in the resulting data.

A field experiment confirmed this hypothesis. The proposed method makes GPR surveys using CMP method more practical and popular. Furthermore, the method has the potential to supply detailed groundwater information. This is because we can convert the spatially dense dielectric constant distribution, obtained by using the CMP method we describe, into a dense physical value distribution that is closely related to such groundwater properties as water saturation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG05059
2005-03-01
2026-01-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Davis, J.L., and Annan, A.P., 1989, Ground-penetrating radar for high-resolution mapping of soil and rock stratigraphy: Geophysical Prospecting, 37, 531–551.
  2. Fisher, E., McMechan, G.A., and Annan, A.P., 1992, Acquisition and processing of wide-aperture ground-penetrating radar data: Geophysics, 57, 495–504.
  3. Gloaguen, E., Chouteau, M., Marcotte, D., and Chapuis, R., 2001, Estimation of hydraulic conductivity of an unconfined aquifer using cokriging of GPR and hydrostratigraphic data: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 47, 135–152.
  4. Greaves, R.J., Lesmes, D.P., Lee, J.M., and Toksöz, M.N., 1996, Velocity variations and water content estimated from multi-offset ground-penetrating radar: Geophysics, 61, 683–695.
  5. Gudmandsen, P., 1971, Electromagnetic probing of ice: Electromagnetic probing in Geophysics: The Golem Press, 321–348.
  6. Lehemann, F., and Green, G.G., 1999, Semiautomated georadar data acquisition in three dimensions: Geophysics, 64, 719–731.
  7. Mayne, W.H., 1962, Common-reflection-point horizontal data stacking techniques: Geophysics, 27, 927–938.
  8. Nakashima, Y., Zhou, H., and Sato, M., 2001, Estimation of groundwater level by GPR in an area with multiple ambiguous reflections: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 47, 241–249.
  9. Onishi, K., Rokugawa, S., Katoh, Y., and Tokunaga, T., 2004, Investigation of extensive groundwater levels using ground penetrating radar: Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP17), 1224–1234.
  10. Pipan, M., Baradello, L., Forte, E., Prizzon, A., and Finetti, I., 1999, 2-D and 3-D processing and interpretation of multi-fold ground penetrating radar data, a case history from an archaeological site: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 41, 271–292.
  11. Sato, M., Hamada, Y., Feng, X., Kong, F., Zeng, Z., and Fang, G., 2004, GPR using an array antenna for landmine detection: Near Surface Geophysics, 2, 7–13.
  12. Sun, J., and Young, R.A., 1995, Recognizing surface scattering in ground-penetrating radar data: Geophysics, 60, 1378–1385.
  13. Yilmaz, O., 2001, Seismic data analysis: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG05059
Loading

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error