1887
Volume 36, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Abstract

Total field magnetometric resistivity (TFMMR) is a highresolution electrical technique that yields information on subsurface resistivity. In a companion paper (Fathianpour et al., 2005, Part I) the basis of a 2.5D TFMMR finite-element modelling approach was developed for a point current source in an otherwise 2D resistivity structure. In this paper (Part II), we use the 2.5D forward modelling algorithm as the basis of a numerical inversion for 2D resistivity structure using a Marquardt-Levenberg algorithm. Application of a quasi-Newton updating formula for approximating the Fréchet derivatives in the course of inversion results in a fast and reliable routine. To overcome the problems of the effect of the geomagnetic field direction and dependency of TFMMR data on all three vector-components, field data are initially reduced to the pole. By doing this, we require only Fréchet derivatives for the vertical anomalous magnetic field, and in the case of the 2D structures, is the most sensitive component to vertical boundaries separating lateral changes in resistivity.

TFMMR data collected across the Flying Doctor Deposit, near Broken Hill in New South Wales, Australia are inverted for 2D resistivity structure. The inverse models show the presence of a conductive zone in the central part of the surveying area corresponding to the known mineralisation and the Globe Vauxhall Shear Zone. Depth resolution is limited, but we demonstrate that the method can resolve lateral boundaries.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG05189
2005-06-01
2026-01-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bishop, J.R., 1989, An evaluation of geophysical test surveys over the Flying Doctor prospect: Broken Hill: Report commissioned by Pasminco Mining Ltd.
  2. Boggs, D.B., Stanley, J.M., and Cattach, M. K., 1998, Feasibility studies of TFMMIP and TFEM surveying with Sub-Audio Magnetics: Exploration Geophysics, 29, 290–295.
  3. Bradley, G.M., 1984, Mount Gipps 1:25,000 Geological Sheet 7234-III-S: Geological Survey of NSW, Sydney.
  4. Broyden, C.G., 1965, A class of methods for solving non-linear simultaneous equations: Mathematics of Computation, 19, 577–593.
  5. Broyden, C.G., 1972, Quasi-Newton methods: in Murray, W. (ed.), Numerical Methods for Unconstrained optimisation: Academic Press.
  6. Burton, G.R., 1994, Metallogenic studies of the Broken Hill and Euriowie Blocks, New South Wales. 3. Mineral deposits of the South-Eastern Broken Hill Block: Geological Survey of NSW, Bulletin, 32 (3).
  7. Cattach, M.K., Stanley, J.M., Lee, S.J., and Boyd, G.W., 1994, Sub-Audio Magnetics (SAM) – A high resolution technique for simultaneously mapping electrical and magnetic properties: Exploration Geophysics, 24, 387–400.
  8. Cattach, M.K., 1996, Sub-Audio Magnetic (SAM) - A High Resolution Geophysical Method for Simultaneously Mapping Electrical and Magnetic Properties of the Earth: Ph.D. thesis (unpublished), University of New England.
  9. Constable, S.C., Parker, R.L., and Constable, C.G., 1987, Occam’s inversion: A practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data: Geophysics, 52, 289–300.
  10. Edwards, R.N., 1974, The magnetometric resistivity method and its application to the mapping of a fault: Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 11, 1136–1156.
  11. Edwards, R.N., Lee, H., and Nabighian, M.N., 1978, On the theory of magnetometric resistivity (MMR) method: Geophysics, 43, 1176–1203.
  12. Emerson, D., 1993, Petrophysics in exploration: Preview, 46, 11–17.
  13. Fathianpour, N., Heinson, G.S., and White, A., 2005, The total field magnetometric (TFMMR) method I: Theory and 2.5D forward modelling: Exploration Geophysics, (this volume).
  14. Hill, S.M., Thomas, M., Earl, K.L., and Foster, K.A., 2003, Regolith expressions of mineralisation within the Flying Doctor Prospect, Northern Leases, Broken Hill, New South Wales. in Peljo, M.(Compiler), Broken Hill Exploration Initiative: Geoscience Australia Record, 81–82.
  15. Hohmann, G.W., and Raiche, A.P., 1988, Inversion of controlled source electromagnetic data: in Nabighian, M.N. (ed.), Electromagnetic Methods in Applied Geophysics, 1, 469–503: Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
  16. Lines, L.R., and Treitel, S., 1984, Tutorial: A review of the Least-Squares inversion and its application to geophysical problems: Geophysical Prospecting, 32, 159–186.
  17. Loke, M.H., and Barker, R.D., 1995, Least-Squares deconvolution of apparent resistivity pseudosections, Geophysics, 60, 1682–1690.
  18. Kellogg, O.D., 1929, Foundations of potential theory: Springer.
  19. McGillivray, P.R., and Oldenburg, D.W., 1990, Methods for calculating Fréchet derivatives and sensitivities for the non-linear inverse problem: A comparative study: Geophysical Prospecting, 38, 499–524.
  20. Park, S.K., and Van, G.P., 1991, Inversion of pole-pole data for 3-D resistivity structure beneath arrays of electrodes: Geophysics, 56, 951–960.
  21. Sasaki, Y., 1989, Two dimensional joint inversion of magnetotelluric and dipoledipole resistivity data: Geophysics, 54, 254–262.
  22. Scales, L.E., 1985, Introduction To Non-Linear Optimisation: Springer-Verlag.
  23. Siegel, H.O., 1974, The magnetic induced polarisation method: Geophysics, 39, 321–339.
  24. Stanley, J.M., and Cattach, M.K., 1990, The use of high definition mapping in engineering site investigation: Exploration Geophysics, 21, 91–103.
  25. Stevens, B.P.J., Stroud, W.J., Willis, I.L., Brown, R.E., Bradly, G.M., and Barnes, R.G., 1980, A stratigraphic interpretation of the Broken Hill block: in Stevens, B.P.J. (ed.), Records of Geological Survey, NSW, 9–32.
  26. Telford, W.M., Geldart, L.P., and Sheriff, R.E., 1990, Applied Geophysics: Second Edition, Cambridge University Press.
  27. Tikhonov, A.N., and Arsenin, V.Y., 1977, Solutions of Ill-Posed Problems: John Wiley & Sons.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG05189
Loading

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error