1887
Volume 36, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

A simple, useful, and practical tool is proposed for the interpretation of moving-loop time-domain electromagnetic (TEM) surveys over two-dimensional (2D) sheet-like conductors embedded in a resistive host. It is based on the relationship observed between attributes of the displayed responses and the geometrical and electrical parameters of the conductive ore body. The ore body is modelled as a plate conductor for which the depth, dip, and conductance parameters are estimated. Numerical and scale modelling are used to establish the interpretative expressions. Responses computed for the various plate parameters are classed according to the following response attributes: time constant, asymmetry, and peak-to-peak distance. Three expressions relating depth, dip, and conductance to the response attributes are determined using multiple linear regression. The relationships are validated using scale-modelling data. The method allows the determination of the plate depth, conductance, and dip with an accuracy of ±10%, ±10% and ±5° respectively. The method is tested on SIROTEM survey data from Chutes-des-Passes in Quebec (Canada), where drill hole information is available. The results show that the regression relationships provide accurate estimates of the basic characteristics of the deposits.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG05374
2005-12-01
2026-01-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Balch, S.J., Crebs, T.J, King, A., and Verbiski, M., 1998, Geophysics of the Voisey’s Bay Ni-Cu-Co deposits: Expanded Abstracts, 68th Annual International Meeting of the SEG.
  2. Balch, S.J., 1999, Ni-Cu Sulphide Deposits with Examples from Voisey’s Bay: Geophysics in Mineral Exploration: Fundamentals and Case Histories, Short Course Notes Volume 14: Lowe, C., Thomas, M.D., and Morris, W.A., (eds.), Geological Association of Canada, 21–40.
  3. Buselli, G., 1980, Interpretation of SIROTEM data from Elura: Bulletin of the Australian Society of Exploration Geophysists, 11, 264–271.
  4. Buselli, G., 1982, The effect of near-surface superparamagnetic material on electromagnetic measurements: Geophysics, 47, 1315–1324.
  5. Buselli, G., McCracken, K.G., and Rutter, H. (Eds.), 1984, Manual for SIROTEM field procedures and data interpretation: CSIRO.
  6. Buselli, G. and Thorburn, M., 1986, Transient electromagnetic model profiles for a thin dyke using coincident loop geometry: Investigation report 143, CSIRO, Institute of Energy and Earth Resources, Division of Mineral Physics and Mineralogy.
  7. Craven, B., Rovira, T., Grammer, T., and Styles, M., 2000, The role of geophysics in the discovery and delineation of the Cosmos nickel sulphide deposit, Leinster area, Western Australia: Exploration Geophysics, 31, 201–209.
  8. Draper, N.R., and Smith H., 1998, Applied regression analysis, 3rd edition: John Wiley & Sons, 706pp.
  9. Duckworth, K., Calvert, H.T., and Juigalli, J., 1991, A method for obtaining depth estimates from the geometry of slingram profiles: Geophysics, 56, 1543–1552.
  10. Eaton, P.A., and Hohmann, G.W., 1987, An evaluation of electromagnetic methods in the presence of geological noise: Geophysics, 52, 1106–1126.
  11. Guptasarma, D., 1984, Positivity of the coincident loop transient electromagnetic response: Geophysics, 49, 194.
  12. Frischknecht, F.C., 1991, Electromagnetic Physical Scale Modelling: in Nabighian, M., (ed.), Electromagnetics Methods: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 364–466.
  13. Kamenetskii, F.M. (ed.), 1976, Handbook of applied methods of transient processes in ore deposits, Nedra, 127pp
  14. Lebart, L., Morineau, A., and Warwick, K.M., 1984, Multivariate descriptive statistical analysis: correspondence analysis and related techniques for large matrices, Wiley, 231pp.
  15. McCracken, K.G., Oristaglio, M.L., and Hohmann, G.W., 1986, A comparison of electromagnetic exploration systems: Geophysics, 51, 810–818
  16. Malo-Lalande, C., 2003, Application of Time-Domain Electromagnetics for Mining Exploration using the Single Loop Configuration: M.Sc.A. thesis (unpublished), University of Montreal, Ecole Polytechnique of Montreal.
  17. Nabighian, M.N., 1979, Quasi-static transient response of a conducting half-space –An approximate representation: Geophysics, 44, 1700–1705.
  18. Nabighian, M.N., and Macnae, J.C., 1991, Time domain electromagnetic prospecting methods: in Nabighian, M. (ed.), Electromagnetics Methods: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 426–520.
  19. Ogilvy, R.D., 1983, A model study of the transient electromagnetic coincident loop technique: Geoexploration, 21, 231–264.
  20. Ogilvy, R.D., 1987, Interpretation of transient EM common-loop anomalies by response characteristics: Geophysical Prospecting, 35, 454–473.
  21. Ramaprasada Rao, I.B., and Bhimasankaram, V.L.S., 1973, Electromagnetic modeling of sheet-like bodies by the combined-loop version of the transient pulse induction method: Geoexploration, 11, 87–95.
  22. Roy, I., 2001, Chute-des-Passes project (#1279) : Drilling campaign report – Houlière, Duhamel, MHY and DNE sectors – june 2001, SOQUEM Inc. and Mines d’Or Virginia.
  23. Spies, B. R., 1976, The Derivation of absolute units in the electromagnetic scale modelling: Geophysics, 41, 1042–1047.
  24. Velikin, A.B., and Bulgakov, Y.I., 1967, Transient process induction method of electrical prospecting with combined transmitter and receiver loop, Nedra, 12–17.
  25. Watt, A., 1997, Exploration for nickel in the 90’s, or “til depth do us part,” in Gubins, A.G., (ed.): Proceedings of Exploration 97. 4th Decennial International Conference on Mineral Exploration, 1003–1014.
  26. Weidelt, P., 1982, Response characteristics of coincident loop transient electromagnetic systems: Geophysics, 47, 1325–1330.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG05374
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): interpretation; moving loop; multiple linear regression; plate-like conductors; TEM

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error