1887
Volume 37, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

The practical ability of elastic wavefield decomposition (EWD) to yield purer compressional (P) and shear (S) seismic images than conventional scalar component analysis of multi-component seismic data is examined. This vector-processing technique takes advantage of the P- and S-wave separation properties of the divergence and curl operators. Practical implementation of EWD requires information about the seismic wavefield at depth. This is achieved via downward continuation of the seismic data using a time-domain, finite-difference approach. Synthetic data experiments demonstrate that the robustness of EWD is dependent on the accuracy and smoothness of the velocity model used during the downward continuation stage of the algorithm. Velocity errors of up to 10% can be tolerated, after which significant artefacts appear in the separated records. A smooth velocity model will avoid contamination by spurious reflection events. P/S separation can still be effective where a constant-velocity model is used for data suffering from statics associated with lateral inhomogeneities in the near surface. Moderate noise contamination does not seem to significantly impact on the wavefield separation results. In fact, the downward continuation process appears to suppress random noise. Application of EWD to a real, two-component dataset from the Bowen Basin, Australia, appears to enhance the relative strength and coherency of the P- and S-wave reflection events in the extracted P and S records, respectively. Following application of EWD, the corresponding converted-wave stack exhibits better coherency and fault definition than the converted-wave stack produced from the raw horizontal-component data.

© 2006 ASEG
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG06139
2006-06-01
2026-01-18

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1071/EG06139
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barkvcd, O.I., Mueller, M.C., and Thomsen, L., 1999, Vector interpretation of the Valhall 3D/4C OBS dataset: 61st Conference and Technical Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts, #6–42.
  2. Cerjan, C., Kosloff, D., Kosloff, R., and Reshef, M., 1985, A nonreflecting boundary condition for discrete acoustic and clastic wave equations: Geophysics, 50, 705–708.
  3. Chen, H-W., and Chang, C-W., 2001, Implicit noise reduction and trace interpolation in wavefield depth extrapolation: 15th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Extended Abstracts, CD-ROM.
  4. Cho, W.H., 1991, Decomposition of Vector Wavefield Data: PhD Thesis (unpublished), Texas A&M University.
  5. Donati, M.S., and Stewart, R.R., 1996, P- and S-wave separation at a liquid-solid interface: Journal of Seismic Exploration, 5, 113–127.
  6. Grant, F.S., and West, G.F., 1965, Interpretation Theory in Applied Geophysics: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
  7. Grecnhalgh, S.A., Mason, I.M., Mosher, C.C., and Lucas, E., 1990, Seismic wavefield separation by multi-componcnt tau-p polarisation filtering: Tectonophvsics, 173, 53-61. ’
  8. Hendrick, N., 2001, Integration and Demonstration of Parametric Techniques for Multi-Component Seismic Wavefield Separation: PhD Thesis (unpublished), University of Queensland.
  9. Hendrick, N., 2004, Shallow, high-resolution converted-wave seismology for coal exploration: in Berry, M.V., and Quigley, M.L. (eds.), Mining Geology 2004 Workshop, AIG Bulletin, 41. 85-91.
  10. Hendrick, N., and Hearn. S., 2003, Introduction to vector-processing techniques for multi-component seismic exploration: 16th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Extended Abstracts, CD-ROM.
  11. Kendall, R.R., Gray, S.H., and Murphy, G.E., 1998, Subsall imaging using prestack depth migration of converted waves: Mahogany Field. Gulf of Mexico: 68th Annual International Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Expanded Abstracts, CD-ROM.
  12. Lcaney, W.S., 1990, Parametric wavefield decomposition and applications: 60th Annual International Meeting, Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Expanded Abstracts, 26-29.
  13. Levandcr, A.R., 1988, Fourth-order finite-difference P-SV scismograms: Geophysics, 53, 1425-1436.
  14. MacLeod, M.K., Hanson, R.A., Bell, C.R., and McHugo, S., 1999, The Alba Field ocean bottom cable seismic survey: impact on development: The Leading Edge, 18, 1306-1312.
  15. McMechan, G.A., and Chen, H.W., 1990. Implicit static corrections in prestack migration of common-source data: Geophysics, 55, 757-760.
  16. McMechan, G.A., and Sun, R., 1991, Depth filtering of first breaks and ground roll: Geophysics, 56. 390-396.
  17. Mittet, R., 2002, Free-surface boundary conditions for elastic staggered-grid modelling schcmcs: Geophysics, 67, 1616-1623.
  18. Sun, R., 1999, Separating P- and S-waves in prcstack 2-dimensional elastic seismograms: 61st Conference and Technical Exhibition, EAGE, Extended Abstracts, #6-23.
  19. Sun, R., and McMechan, G.A., 1986, Prcstack reverse-time migration for elastic waves with application to synthetic offset vertical seismic profiles: Proceedings of the IEEE, 74, 457-465.
  20. Sun, R., Chow, J., and Chen, K-J., 2001. Phase correction in separating P- and S- waves in elastic data: Geophysics, 66, 1515-1518.
  21. Sun, R., McMechan, G.A., Hsiao, H-H., and Chow, J„ 2004, Separating P- and S- waves in prcstack 3D elastic seismograms using divergence and curl: Geophysics, 69, 286-297.
  22. Velseis, 2003, Investigation of converted-wave seismic reflection for improved resolution of coal structures - final report: ACARP Project C10020.
  23. Virieux, J., 1986, P-SV wave propagation in heterogeneous media: velocity-stress finite-difference method: Geophysics, 51, 889-901.
  24. Zhe, J., and Greenhalgh, S.A., 1997, Prestack multicomponent migration: Geophysics, 62, 598-613.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG06139
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): converted-wave seismic; divergence and curl operators; elastic wavefield decomposition; multi-component seismic; P-and S-wave separation; vector processing

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error