1887
Volume 37, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Gravity anomalies sourced from geological features of the upper crust are overprinted by the isostatic signal. Isostasy includes the familiar Airy-Heiskanen crustal-root response to topography, and an additional flexure of the base of the crust in response to geological loads. We have applied a two-step process to isolate the geological signal in gravity data from New South Wales. An isostatic residual (IR) anomaly map was generated by removing from the Bouguer anomaly the gravity arising from a modelled crustal root of topography, assuming Airy isostasy and purely local compensation. Reduction of the dynamic range in the IR map accentuates both local geological features and major boundaries between terranes. Discrimination of crustal features is particularly improved along the east coast and Great Dividing Range. Decompensative correction comprises removal of the gravity contribution of the crustal compensation for the geological load from the IR anomaly, to yield the decompensative anomaly (DA). We have approximated this correction by continuing the IR anomaly upward by 30 km to filter out the upper- and mid- crust contribution. Geological features are further highlighted by the DA map, especially in the south-west of the state below Murray Basin cover, although the signal of major features which penetrate the crust may be suppressed. Judicious use of either the IR or DA anomaly maps will aid interpretation of the geology of New South Wales.

© 2006 ASEG
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG06210
2006-09-01
2026-01-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1071/EG06210
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Airy, G.B., 1855, On the computation of the effect of the attraction of mountain-masses as disturbing the apparent astronomical latitude of stations of geodetic surveys: Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 145, 101-104.
  2. Banks, R.J., Parker, R.L., and Huestis, S.R, 1977, Isostatic compensation on a continental scale; local versus regional mechanisms: Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 51, 431-452.
  3. Christensen, N.I. and Mooney, W.D., 1995, Seismic velocity structure and composition of the continental crust: a global view: Journal of Geophysical Research, 100, 9761-9788.
  4. Cordell, L., Zorin, Y.A. and Keller, G.R., 1991, The decompensative gravity anomaly and deep structure of the region of the Rio Grande Rift: Journal of Geophysical Research, 96, 6557-6568.
  5. Cowan, D., and Cooper, G., 2005a, Separation filtering using fractional order derivatives: Exploration Geophysics, 36, 393-396.
  6. Cowan, D., and Cooper, G., 2005b, The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission - a new source of near-global digital elevation data: Exploration Geophysics, 36, 334-340.
  7. Cowan, D.R., and Cowan, S., 1993, Separation filtering applied to aeromagnetic data: Exploration Geophysics, 24, 429-436.
  8. Featherstone, W.E., 2002, Expected contributions of dedicated satellite gravity field missions to regional geoid determination with some examples from Australia: Journal of Geospatial Engineering, 4, 1-19.
  9. Forsyth, D.W., 1985, Subsurface loading and estimates of the flexural rigidity of continental lithosphere: Journal of Geophysical Research, 90, 12623-12632.
  10. Glen, R.A., 2005, The Tasmanides of eastern Australia: in Vaughan, A.P.M., Leat, P.T., and Pankhurst, R.J. (eds), Terrane Processes at the Margins of Gondwana,: Geological Society, London, Special Publication, 246, 23-96.
  11. Hackney, R.I., Featherstone, W.E., and Gotze, H.-J., 2004, Regional-residual gravity field separation in the Central Andes using global geopotential models: 17th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition, Australian Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Extended Abstracts.
  12. Jachens, R.C, and Griscom, A., 1985, An isostatic residual gravity map of California; a residual map for interpretation of anomalies from intracrustal sources: in Hinze, W.J. (ed.), The Utility of Regional Gravity and Magnetic Anomaly Maps: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 347-360.
  13. Jacobsen, B.H., 1987, A case for upward continuation as a standard separation filter for potential-fie Id maps: Geophysics, 52, 1138-1148.
  14. Lewis, B.T.R., and Dorman, L.M., 1970, Experimental isostasy; 2. An isostatic model for the U.S.A. derived from gravity and topography data: Journal of Geophysical Research, IS, 3367-3386.
  15. Lockwood, A., 2004a, Isostatic and decompensative gravity anomalies over Western Australia: Preview, 108, 22-23.
  16. Lockwood, A.M., 2004b, Western Australia: isostatic residual gravity anomaly and depth to basement model: Western Australia Geological Survey, Record 2004/14.
  17. McNutt, M.K., and Parker, R.L., 1978, Isostasy in Australia and the evolution of the compensation mechanism: Science, 199, 773-775.
  18. Murray, C.G., Scheibner, E., and Walker, R.N., 1989, Regional geological interpretation of a digital coloured residual Bouguer gravity image of eastern Australia with a wavelength cut-off of 250 km: Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 36, 423-449.
  19. Petkovic, P., and Buchanan, C, 2002, Australian bathymetry and topography grid [Digital Dataset]: Geoscience Australia.
  20. Scheibner, E., and Basden, H., 1996, Geology of New South Wales - Synthesis. Volume 1, Structural Framework: Geological Survey of New South Wales Memoir Geology 13(1).
  21. Simpson, R.W., Jachens, R.C. and Blakeley, R.J., 1983, AIRYROOT: A FORTRAN program for calculating the gravitational attraction of an Airy isostatic root out to 166.7 km: US Geological Survey Open File Report 83-883.
  22. Simpson, R.W., Jachens, R.C, Blakeley, R.J., and Saltus, R.W., 1986, A new isostatic residual gravity map of the conterminous United States with a discussion on the significance of isostatic residual anomalies: Journal of Geophysical Research, 92, 8348-8372.
  23. Spencer, R., 2003, Isostatic correction of the gravity map of New South Wales: Preview, 107, 23.
  24. Vening Meinesz, FA., 1939, Tables fondamentales pour la reduction isostatique régionale: Bulletin Géodésique, 63, 711-776.
  25. Watts, A.B., 2001, Isostasy and Flexure of the Lithosphere: Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K.
  26. Webster, M., 2006, The new Australian bathymetry and topography grid: Preview, 121,31-33.
  27. Zorin, Yu. A., Kozhevnikov, V.M., Novoselova. M.R., and Turutanov, E.Kh., 1989, Thickness of the lithosphere beneath the Baikal rift zone and adjacent regions: Tectonophysics, 168, 327-337.
  28. Zuber, M.T., Bechtel, T.D., and Forsyth, D.W., 1989, Effective elastic thickness of the lithosphere and mechanisms of isostatic compensation in Australia: Journal of Geophysical Research, 94, 9353-9367.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG06210
Loading
  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): compensation; decompensative anomaly; Gravity; isostasy; isostatic residual anomaly; New South Wales

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error