1887
Volume 38, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Since their introduction by Nigel Anstey and Tury Taner in the 1970s, attributes have become an integral tool in the interpreter’s arsenal. At present, as emphasised by Taner, no direct relationships have been established between all attributes and physical and geological characteristics of the subsurface. Their discriminatory properties, however, allow very useful classifications to be performed. This paper deals with various attribute-related issues.

First, we consider the theoretical and physical aspects concerning instantaneous attributes, particularly instantaneous phase. This attribute is of central importance since it describes the location of events in the seismic trace and leads to the computation of other instantaneous quantities. Second, we deal with the issue of information content. It has often been implied that attributes convey no more information than that present in the original seismic trace from which they are derived. This, however, is akin to claiming that David contains no more information than the raw marble from which Michelangelo freed him. A seismic attribute section provides that much more information. The attribute in time attempts to enhance resolution, whereas the attribute property in the spatial dimension emphasises continuity. These important and interesting issues will be dealt with theoretically and by example. Finally, we present and illustrate by synthetic and real data examples, a novel, hybrid attribute which has been constructed to provide high resolution information. We must point out that, as is always the case, our attribute is dependent on the phase of the source wavelet.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG07023
2007-12-01
2026-01-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barnes A. 2006 Too many seismic attributes?: CSEG Recorder 31 41 45
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cohen L. 1993 Instantaneous ‘anything’: Proceedings Acoustic Speech, Signal Processing 4 105 108
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Fomel S. 2007 Local seismic attributes: Geophysics 72 A29 A33 doi:10.1190/1.2437573
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Gretton A. Herbrich R. Smola A. Busquet O. Schölkopf B. 2005 Kernel methods for measuring independence: Journal of Machine Learning Research 6 205 2129
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Russell R. D. 1996 Speculations on biot “slow” waves: Canadian Journal Exploration Geophysics 32 1 5
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Taner M. T. 2001 Seismic attributes: CSEG Recorder 26 49 56
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Tolstoy I. 1973, Wave Propagation International Series of Earth & Planetary Science: McGraw-Hill.
  8. Ulrych T. J. , and Sacchi M. D. 2005, Information-based Inversion and Processing with Applications Handbook of Geophysical Exploration Seismic Exploration: Elsevier.
  9. Zhang C. Ulrych T. J. 2002 Estimation of quality factors from cmp records: Geophysics 67 1542 1547 doi:10.1190/1.1512799
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1071/EG07023
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG07023
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): attributes; instantaneous attributes; seismic interpretation; seismic processing

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error