1887
Volume 39, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Density plays an important role in coal resource estimation and reconciliation, as well as in defining coal quality. Current practice employs direct density measurements on widely spaced core samples, rather than utilising abundant geophysical logging data. This is mostly due to the perception that the precision and accuracy of density estimation from geophysical logs is unsatisfactory. This paper demonstrates that the density wireline log, supported by other geophysical logs, provides a reliable direct measurement of in-situ coal density. We have produced a consistent and reliable correlation of geophysical log density with a laboratory-derived density to within an accuracy of ±3%. This is achieved through careful constraints such as compensating for lost pore spaces and moisture to bring the laboratory relative density closer to in-situ environmental conditions, matching the laboratory sample depths with geophysical logs, excluding thin, boundary, and stone-band samples from the dataset, and calibrating the geophysical density with laboratory testing data and other geophysical logs by linear regression or Radial Basis Function and Self-Organised Mapping techniques. In addition, we also illustrate that the improved geophysical log density can be used for coal quality estimation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG08011
2008-06-01
2026-01-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alvarez D. Borrego A.G. 2005 Apparent versus true density for the volume-to-weight transformation in coal blends: Journal of Microscopy 220 221 228 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2818.2005.01532.x
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Billings S. D. Beatson R. K. Newsamn G. N. 2002 a Interpolation of geophysical data using continuous global surfaces: Geophysics 67 1810 1822 doi:10.1190/1.1527081
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Billings S. D. Newsamn G. N. Beatson R. K. 2002 b Smooth fitting of geophysical data using continuous global surfaces: Geophysics 67 1823 1834 doi:10.1190/1.1527082
    [Google Scholar]
  4. B P B Instruments 1981, Coal interpretation manual: East Leake, England.
  5. Coléou T. Poupon M. Azbel K. 2003 , Unsupervised seismic facies classification: a review and comparison of techniques and implementation: The Leading Edge 22 942 953 doi:10.1190/1.1623635
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Dong H. Hou J. Li N. Wang H. 2001 The logging evaluation method for coal quality and methane: Geophysical & Geochemical Exploration 25 138 143
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Edwards K. W. Banks K. M. 1978 A theoretical approach to the evaluation of in-situ coal: Canadian Mining and Metallurgical Bulletin 71 124 131
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Elkington P. A. S. , Samworth J. R. , and Enstone 1990, Vertical enhancement by combination and transformation of associated responses: Society of Professional Well Log Analysts 31st Logging Symposium, Lafayette, La., Transactions, HH1–HH20.
  9. Essenreiter R. Karrenbach M. Treitel S. 2001 Identification and classification of multiple reflections with self-organizing maps: Geophysical Prospecting 49 341 352 doi:10.1046/j.1365-2478.2001.00261.x
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Fishel K. W. , and Mayer R., 1979, Extremely high resolution density coal logging techniques In G. O. Argall ed., Coal Exploration: Proceedings of the 2nd International Coal Exploration Symposium, Denver, October 1978, 490–504.
  11. Fletcher I. S. , and Sanders R. H., 2003, Estimation of in-situ moisture of coal seams and product total moisture: Final Report for ACARP Project C10041.
  12. Groves B. Bowen E. 1981 The application of geophysical borehole logging to coal exploration: Australian Coal Geology 3 51 59
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kahraman H., 1998, Literature survey on coal quality predicted from the geophysical logs: CSIRO internal report (unpublished).
  14. Meyers A. , Clarkson C. , Wex T. , and Leach B., 2004, Estimation of in-situ density of coal from apparent relative density and relative density analyses: Final Report for ACARP Project C10042.
  15. Mullen M. J. 1988, Log evaluation in wells drilled for coalbed methane: Geology and Coalbed Methane Resources of the Northern San Juan Basin, Colorada and New Mexico Guidebook, Rocky Mountain Association of Geologists, 113–124.
  16. Mullen M. J., 1989, Coalbed methane resource evaluation from wireline logs in the Northeastern San Juan Basin A case study: Proceedings: SPE Joint Rocky Mountain Regional/Low Permeability Reservoirs Symposium and Exhibition, March 6–8, 1989, Denver, CO, USA.
  17. Mutton A.J. and Turner R. 2002, Mt Pleasant Project, Hunt Valley, NSW: Estimation of coal quality from geophysical log data – Stage 1: A report to Coal & Allied Operations Pty Ltd (Unpublished).
  18. Preston K. B., 2005, Estimating the in-situ relative density of coal – old favourites and new developments: The Proceeding of Bowen Basin Symposium 2005, 13–20.
  19. Preston K. B. Sanders R. H. 1993 Estimating the in-situ relative density of coal: Australian Coal Geology 9 22 26
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Quinn G. W. 2000 A new method for estimating the density of coal resource and reserve calculations: Queensland Government Mining Journal 100 14 15
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Ronen S. , Schultz P. S. , Hattori M. , and Corbett C., 1994, Seismic-guided estimation of log properties, Part 1, 2, and 3: The Leading Edge, 13, 305–310, 674–678, 770–776.
  22. Russell B. H. Lines L. R. Hampson D. P. 2003 Application of the radial basis function neural network to the prediction of log properties from seismic attributes: Exploration Geophysics 34 15 23 doi:10.1071/EG03015
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Schlumberger 1991, Log Interpretation Principles/Applications: Schlumberger Educational Services.
  24. Sliwa R. , Fraser S. J. , and Dickson B. L. 2003, Application of self-organising maps to the recognition of specific lithologies from borehole geophysics In A. C. Hutton, B. G. Jones, P. F. Carr, B. Ackerman, A. D. Switzer, eds., Proceedings of the 35th Sydney Basin Symposium on “Advances in the study of the Sydney Basin”, September 29–30, 2003, University of Wollongong, 105–113.
  25. Standards Australia International, 2002, AS 1038.21.1.1–2002, Coal and coke – analysis and testing Part 21.1.1: Higher rank coal and coke – relative density – analysis sample/density bottle method. Standards Australia International.
  26. Strecker U. Uden R. 2002 Data mining of poststack seismic attribute volumes using Kohonen self-organizing maps: The Leading Edge 21 1032 1037
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1071/EG08011
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG08011
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): coal density, coal quality, geophysical logs.

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error