1887
Volume 40, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Unsupervised classification techniques, such as cluster algorithms, are routinely used for structural exploration and integration of multiple frequency bands of remotely sensed spectral datasets. However, up to now, very few attempts have been made towards using unsupervised classification techniques for rapid, automated, and objective information extraction from large airborne geophysical data suites. We employ fuzzy -means (FCM) cluster analysis for the rapid and largely automated integration of complementary geophysical datasets comprising airborne radiometric and magnetic as well as ground-based gravity data, covering a survey area of approximately 5000 km2 located 100 km east-south-east of Johannesburg, South Africa, along the south-eastern limb of the Bushveld layered mafic intrusion complex. After preparatory data processing and normalisation, the three datasets are subjected to FCM cluster analysis, resulting in the generation of a zoned integrated geophysical map delineating distinct subsurface units based on the information the three input datasets carry. The fuzzy concept of the cluster algorithm employed also provides information about the significance of the identified zonation. According to the nature of the input datasets, the integrated zoned map carries information from near-surface depositions as well as rocks underneath the sediment cover. To establish a sound geological association of these zones we refer the zoned geophysical map to all available geological information, demonstrating that the zoned geophysical map as obtained from FCM cluster analysis outlines geological units that are related to Bushveld-type, other Proterozoic- and Karoo-aged rocks.

© 2009 ASEG
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG08028
2009-09-01
2026-01-19

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1071/EG08028
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ahn C. W. Baumgardner M. F. Biehl L. L. 1999 Delineation of soil variability using geostatistics and fuzzy clustering analyses of hyperspectral data: Soil Science Society of America Journal 63 142 150
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson-Mayes A. M. 2002 Strategies to improve information extraction from multivariate geophysical data suites: Exploration Geophysics 33 57 64 doi:10.1071/EG02057
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Backer E. Jain A. K. 1981 A clustering performance measure based on fuzzy set decomposition: IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 3 66 75 doi:10.1109/TPAMI.1981.4767051
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bezdek J. C. 1981, Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms: Plenum Press.
  5. Bezdek J. C. , and Hathaway R. J. 2002, Some notes on alternating optimization, in N. R. Pal. and M. Sugeno, eds, Advances in Soft Computing – AFSS 2002: Springer, 187–195.
  6. Bragato G. 2004 Fuzzy continuous classification and spatial interpolation in conventional soil survey for soil mapping of the lower Piave plain: Geoderma 118 1 16 doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00166-6
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Buchanan P. C. 2006, The Rooiberg Group, in M. R. Johnson, C. R. Anhaeusser, and R. J. Thomas, eds, The geology of South Africa: Geological Society of South Africa, Johannesburg, 283–289.
  8. Cole P. 2004, South-eastern Bushveld airborne magnetic survey: Open file report no 2004–0103, Council for Geoscience, Pretoria.
  9. Cole J. , and Maré L. P. 2004, A geophysical investigation of the regional potential field data over the south-eastern limb of the Bushveld Complex: Open file report no 2004–0101, Council for Geoscience, Pretoria.
  10. Council for Geoscience 1986, Geological Map 2628 (East Rand), 1 : 250 000 Geological Series, Pretoria.
  11. de Bruin S. Stein A. 1998 Soil-landscape modelling using fuzzy c-means clustering of attribute data derived from digital elevation model (DEM): Geoderma 83 17 33 doi:10.1016/S0016-7061(97)00143-2
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Du C. Lee J. S. 1996 Fuzzy classification of earth terrain covers using complex polarimetric SAR data: International Journal of Remote Sensing 17 809 826 doi:10.1080/01431169608949047
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Durrheim R. J. 1987, The interpretation of the 2628 (East Rand) aeromagnetic map: Open file report no 1987–0101, Council for Geoscience, Pretoria.
  14. Eberle D. 1993, Geologic mapping based upon multivariate statistical analysis of airborne geophysical data: International Institute for Aerospace Survey and Earth Sciences (ITC) Journal Special issue, 173–178.
  15. Eberle D. G. , Cole J. , Häuserer M. , and Stettler E. H. 2005, Combined stochastic and deterministic modelling as an innovative approach to jointly interpret multi-method airborne geophysical data sets: Extended abstract, 9th SAGA Biennial Conference and Exhibition, Cape Town.
  16. Eberle D. G. , Nyabeze P. K. , and Legotle L. R. 2008, Geophysical ground truth control of airborne magnetic and gamma-ray anomalies in the Dwarsberge, map reference 2426: [Council for Geoscience, Pretoria.] Series number: 2000-0130 p 51.
  17. Fridgen J. J. Kitchen N. R. Sudduth K. A. Drummond S. T. Wiebold W. J. Fraisse C. W. 2004 Management Zone Analyst (MZA): Software for subfield management zone delineation: Agronomy Journal 96 100 108
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Gath I. Geva A. B. 1989 Unsupervised optimal fuzzy clustering: IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 11 773 780 doi:10.1109/34.192473
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Güler C. Thyne G. D. 2004 Delineation of hydrochemical facies distribution in a regional groundwater system by means of fuzzy c-means clustering: Water Resources Research 40 doi:10.1029/2004WR003299
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hathaway R. J. Bezdek J. C. 2001 Fuzzy c-means clustering of incomplete data: IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part B 31 735 744 doi:10.1109/3477.956035
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Holliger K. , Tronicke J. , Paasche H. , and Dafflon B. , 2008, Quantitative integration of hydrogeophysical and hydrological data: Geostatistical approaches, in C. J. G. Darnault, ed., Overexploitation and contamination of shared groundwater resources: Springer, 67–82.
  22. Höppner F. , Klawonn F. , Kruse R. , and Runkler T. 1999, Fuzzy cluster analysis: Methods for classification, data analysis, and image recognition: Wiley.
  23. Kaufmann L. , and Rousseeuw P. J. 1990, Finding groups in data: an introduction to cluster analysis: Wiley.
  24. Knab M. Appel E. Hoffmann V. 2001 Separation of the anthropogenic portion of heavy metal contents along a highway by means of magnetic susceptibility and fuzzy c-means cluster analysis: European Journal of Environmental and Engineering Geophysics 6 125 140
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Kruiver P. P. Kok Y. S. Dekkers M. J. Langereis C. G. Laj C. 1999 A pseudo-Thellier relative paleointensity record, and rock magnetic and geochemical parameters in relation to climate during the last 276 kyr in the Azores region: Geophysical Journal International 136 757 770 doi:10.1046/j.1365-246x.1999.00777.x
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Lanne E. 1986 Statistical multivariate analysis of airborne geophysical data on the SE border of the central Lapland Greenstone Complex: Geophysical Prospecting 34 1111 1128 doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.1986.tb00516.x
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Martelet G. Truffert C. Tourlière B. Ledru P. Perrin J. 2006 Classifying airborne radiometry data with agglomerative hierarchical clustering: a tool for geological mapping in context of rainforest (French Guiana): International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 8 208 223 doi:10.1016/j.jag.2005.09.003
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Paasche H. Tronicke J. Holliger K. Green A. G. Maurer H. 2006 Integration of diverse physical-property models: Subsurface zonation and parameter estimation based on fuzzy c-means cluster analyses: Geophysics 71 H33 H44 doi:10.1190/1.2192927
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Paasche H. , Günther T. , Tronicke J. , Green A. G. , Maurer H. , and Holliger K. 2007, Integrating multi-scale geophysical data for the 3D characterization of an alluvial aquifer: Istanbul, Turkey: 13th European Conference on Environmental and Engineering Geophysics (EAGE Near Surface Geophysics), Expanded Abstracts, 5 p.
  30. Peschel G. 1973 Zur quantitativen komplexen Interpretation gravimetrischer und magnetischer Profile: Zeitschrift für Angewandte Geologie 19 287 292
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Pires A. C. B. Harthill N. 1989 Statistical analysis of airborne gamma-ray data for geologic mapping purposes: Crixas-Itapaci area, Goiás, Brazil: Geophysics 54 1326 1332 doi:10.1190/1.1442592
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Pirkle F. L. Howell J. A. Wecksung G. W. Duran B. S. Stablein N. K. 1984 An example of cluster analysis applied to a large geologic data set: Aerial radiometric data from Copper Mountain, Wyoming: Mathematical Geology 16 479 498 doi:10.1007/BF01886328
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Roubens M. 1982 Fuzzy cluster algorithms and their cluster validity: European Journal of Operational Research 10 294 301 doi:10.1016/0377-2217(82)90228-4
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Runkler T. A. , and Glesner M. 1994, Defuzzification and ranking in the context of membership value semantics, rule modality, and measurement theory: Proceedings of the 1st European Congress on Intelligent Techniques and Soft Computing (EUFIT 94), ELITE Foundation, Expanded Abstracts, 1206–1210.
  35. Shi H. , Shen Y. , and Liu Z. 2003, Hyperspectral bands reduction based on rough sets and fuzzy c-means clustering: Proceedings of the 20th IEEE Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference, Vol. 2, 1053–1056.
  36. Siehl A. 1984, Mehrdimensionale statistische Verfahren, in F. Bender, ed., Angewandte Geowissenschaften Bd. II: Methoden der angewandten Geophysik und mathematischen Verfahren in den Geowissenschaften: Enke, 709–741.
  37. Stettler R. H. , Du Plessis J. G. , Venter C. P. , Potgieter T. D. , Share F. G. , and Hattingh E. 2000, Regional gravity survey of the 2628 (East Rand) 1: 250 000 sheet: Unpublished report 2000–0049, Council for Geoscience, Pretoria.
  38. Tronicke J. Holliger K. Barrash W. Knoll M. D. 2004 Multivariate analysis of crosshole georadar velocity and attenuation tomograms for aquifer zonation: Water Resources Research 40 W01519 doi:10.1029/2003WR002031
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Urbat M. Dekkers M. J. Krumsiek K. 2000 Discharge of hydrothermal fluids through sediment at the Escanaba Trough, Gorda Rich (ODP Leg 169); assessing the effects on the rock magnetic signal: Earth and Planetary Science Letters 176 481 494 doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(00)00024-8
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Van Leekwijck W. Kerre E. E. 1999 Defuzzification: criteria and classification: Fuzzy Sets and Systems 108 159 178 doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00337-0
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Xie X. L. Beni G. 1991 A validity measure for fuzzy clustering: IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 13 841 847 doi:10.1109/34.85677
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1071/EG08028
Loading
Rapid integration of large airborne geophysical data suites using a fuzzy partitioning cluster algorithm: a tool for geological mapping and mineral exploration targeting
Exploration Geophysics 40, 277 (2009); https://doi.org/10.1071/EG08028
/content/journals/10.1071/EG08028
/content/journals/10.1071/EG08028
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): airborne geophysics; cluster analysis; geological mapping; multivariate statistics; South Africa

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error