1887
Volume 40, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

In field surveys using the dipole–dipole electrical resistivity method, we often encounter negative apparent resistivity. The term ‘negative apparent resistivity’ refers to apparent resistivity values with the opposite sign to surrounding data in a pseudosection. Because these negative apparent resistivity values have been regarded as measurement errors, we have discarded the negative apparent resistivity data. Some people have even used negative apparent resistivity data in an inversion process, by taking absolute values of the data. Our field experiments lead us to believe that the main cause for negative apparent resistivity is neither measurement errors nor the influence of self potentials. Furthermore, we also believe that it is not caused by the effects of induced polarization. One possible cause for negative apparent resistivity is the subsurface geological structure. In this study, we provide some numerical examples showing that negative apparent resistivity can arise from geological structures.

In numerical examples, we simulate field data using a 3D numerical modelling algorithm, and then extract 2D sections. Our numerical experiments demonstrate that the negative apparent resistivity can be caused by geological structures modelled by U-shaped and crescent-shaped conductive models. Negative apparent resistivity usually occurs when potentials increase with distance from the current electrodes. By plotting the voltage-electrode position curves, we could confirm that when the voltage curves intersect each other, negative apparent resistivity appears. These numerical examples suggest that when we observe negative apparent resistivity in field surveys, we should consider the possibility that the negative apparent resistivity has been caused by geological structure.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG08111
2009-03-01
2026-01-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. ABEM 2007, ABEM Terrameter SAS4000/SAS1000 instruction manual, pp 10–11 [Web document]: Accessed 5 January, 2009 Available at: http://www.abem.se/files/upload/Manual_Terrameter.pdf.
  2. Cho I.-K. Kim J.-J. Chung S.-H. Suh J.-H. 2002 Negative apparent resistivity in resistivity method: Mulli-tamsa 5199 205[in Korean]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. IRIS Instruments, Resistivity Sounding. [Web document]: Accessed 5 January, 2009. Available at: http://www.iris-instruments.com/Pdf%20file/4-Resistivity_Sounding/summary_of_operation.pdf
  4. Jung H.-K. Chung H. , and Lim M. et al 2000, Development and field applications of high-power and synchronized stand-alone transmitter resistivity system: KIGAM report KR-99-(B)-11-1999-R (in Korean with English abstract).
  5. Reynolds J. M. 1997, An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics: John Wiley & Sons.
  6. Spitzer K. 1995 A 3-D finite difference algorithm for DC resistivity modeling using conjugate gradient methods: Geophysical Journal International 123903 914 doi:10.1111/j.1365-246X.1995.tb06897.x
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Telford W. M. , Geldart L. P. , and Sheriff R. E. 1990, Applied Geophysics: second edition: Cambridge University Press.
  8. The Society of Exploration Geophysicists of Japan (SEGJ) 2004, Application of geophysical method to engineering and environmental problems, p 116 [in Japanese]
/content/journals/10.1071/EG08111
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG08111
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error