1887
Volume 40, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Kalahari cover greater than 60 m thick precludes indicator sampling from identifying individual kimberlite intrusions in the Kokong kimberlite field of Botswana. Employing concurrent multidisciplinary geophysical surveying methods is the exploration technique for the discovery of kimberlites. Time Domain Electromagnetic (TEM) surveying is an effective technique for the prioritization of aeromagnetic and gravity signatures. Diagnostic discrete conductive TEM signatures are usually returned from kimberlites overlain by up to 120 m of Kalahari cover. Following the success of kimberlite identification by ground TEM, a VTEM helicopter time domain survey was flown over the Kokong field to increase the TEM coverage in this prospective kimberlite terrain. A comparison of responses over covered kimberlites traversed by both TEM survey methods and their comparative effectiveness for kimberlite identification is presented.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG09019
2009-12-01
2026-01-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Cumming B. 1985, Final report on work completed PL32/77 (Kang North), PL 33/77 (Kang South), PL17/78 (Kang West), PL 18/78 (Kang East) and PL 25/79 (Kang North West) from January 1978 to December 1982, Bulletin No. B212 (2436), Falconbridge Explorations Botswana (Pty) Ltd.
  2. da Costa A. J. M. 1989Palmietfontein kimberlite pipe, South Africa, A case history: Geophysics 54689 700 doi:10.1190/1.1442697
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Hansen J. , and Finney W. 1980, Interpretation report airborne electromagnetic survey, Barringer INPUT survey of the Kang areas A, B, and C, Botswana for Falconbridge Botswana (Pty) Ltd.
  4. Hinks D. 2003, Borehole logging of Kokong targets Botswana: unpublished Rio Tinto report.
  5. Hinks D. , McIntosh S. , and Lane R. 2004, A comparison of the Falcon® and Air-FTG™ airborne gravity gradiometer systems at the Kokong Test Block, Botswana, In: Airborne Gravity 2004 – Abstracts from the ASEG-PESA Airborne Gravity 2004 Workshop: Geoscience Australia Record, 2004/18, 125–134.
  6. Jansen J. , and Witherly K. 2004, The Tli Kwi Cho Kimberlite Complex, Northwest Territories, Canada: A Geophysical Case Study: 74th Annual Mtg Soc. Expl. Geophy. Tech Prog (Ext. Abstr): Denver, CO. 231 147–1149.
  7. MacInnes S. and Raymond M. 2001, STEMINV Documentation – Smooth Model TEM Inversion, V.3.00: Zonge Engineering and Research Organization.
  8. Macnae J. C. 1979Kimberlite and exploration geophysics: Geophysics 441395 1416 doi:10.1190/1.1441014
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Macnae J. C. 1995Applications of geophysics for the detection and exploration of kimberlites and lamproites: Journal of Geochemical Exploration 53213 243 doi:10.1016/0375-6742(94)00057-I
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Macnae J. C. King A. Stolz N. Osmakoff A. Blaha A. 1998Fast AEM data processing and inversion: Exploration Geophysics 29163 169 doi:10.1071/EG998163
    [Google Scholar]
  11. West G. F. Macnae J. C. Lamontagne Y. 1984A time-domain EM system measuring the step response of the ground: Geophysics 491010 1026 doi:10.1190/1.1441716
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1071/EG09019
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG09019
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Kalahari; kimberlite; magnetic; petrophysics; survey; TEM; VTEM

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error