1887
Volume 41, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

Visual interactive ray trace (VIRT) inversion is a manual approach to refraction tomography. VIRT tomograms neither detect nor define a major 50 m wide zone with a low seismic velocity at Mt Bulga. This failure is attributed to the probable use of a low resolution starting model, specifically the smooth velocity gradient wavepath eikonal traveltime (WET) tomogram, for the VIRT inversion. In this case, the low resolution of the VIRT tomogram is another demonstration of the ubiquity of non-uniqueness.

Alternatively, the conventional reciprocal method has been used to generate a starting model, in which the existence of the low velocity region is unequivocal. In this case, confirmation bias has been employed to remove any expression of the low velocity region in the VIRT tomogram.

By contrast, WET refraction tomograms produced with smooth and detailed starting models generated with the generalised reciprocal method (GRM) clearly define the 50 m wide zone with the low seismic velocities. The low velocity zone is confirmed with a priori information, specifically the inverted head wave amplitudes and a spectral analysis of the refraction convolution section, and by a posteriori information, specifically numerous closely spaced orthogonal refraction profiles. Furthermore, the GRM tomograms have smaller misfit errors than the tomograms obtained with VIRT tomography and with WET tomograms generated with VIRT starting models.

VIRT tomography generates complex velocity models of the weathering from relatively small numbers of traveltimes, indicating that VIRT is overfitting the data. The extensive use of vertical interfaces across which there are large contrasts in seismic velocities is not consistent with standard models of normal weathering profiles, nor is it indicated in the traveltime graphs. By contrast, VIRT generates simple velocity models in the sub-weathering from many traveltimes, indicating that VIRT is underfitting those traveltimes.

VIRT neither improves the accuracy nor the geological verisimilitude of refraction tomography. Furthermore, VIRT is time consuming, subjective, and in the final analysis, simply outdated. Although technically, VIRT is efficacious, the alternatives of automatic refraction tomography are more practical, more accurate, and generate more useful tomograms.

ASEG
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG09028
2010-12-01
2026-01-17

  • From This Site

    /content/journals/10.1071/EG09028
    dcterms_title,dcterms_subject,pub_keyword
    -contentType:Journal -contentType:Contributor -contentType:Concept -contentType:Institution
    10
    5
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Ackermann, H. D., Pankratz, L. W., and Dansereau, D., 1982, A comprehensive system for interpreting seismic refraction arrival-time data using interactive computer methods: USGS Open File Report 82–1065.
  2. Hagedoorn J. G. 1959 The plus-minus method of interpreting seismic refraction sections: Geophysical Prospecting 7 158 182 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.1959.tb01460.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1959.tb01460.x [Google Scholar]
  3. Hagiwara T. Omote S. 1939 Land creep at Mt Tyausu-Yama (Determination of slip plane by seismic prospecting): Tokyo University Earthquake Research Institute Bulletin 17 118 137
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Hawkins L. V. 1961 The reciprocal method of routine shallow seismic refraction investigations: Geophysics 26 806 819 10.1190/1.1438961
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1438961 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ivanov J. Miller R. D. Xia J. Steeples D. Park C. B. 2005 a The inverse problem of refraction travel times, part I; types of geophysical nonuniqueness through minimization: Pure and Applied Geophysics 162 447 459 10.1007/s00024‑004‑2615‑1
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-004-2615-1 [Google Scholar]
  6. Ivanov J. Miller R. D. Xia J. Steeples D. 2005 b The inverse problem of refraction travel times, part II; quantifying refraction nonuniqueness using a three-layer model: Pure and Applied Geophysics 162 461 477 10.1007/s00024‑004‑2616‑0
    https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-004-2616-0 [Google Scholar]
  7. Lanz E. Maurer H. Green A. G. 1998 Refraction tomography over a buried waste disposal site: Geophysics 63 1414 1433 10.1190/1.1444443
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444443 [Google Scholar]
  8. Menke, W., 1989, Geophysical data analysis: discrete inverse theory, Academic Press.
  9. Oldenburg, D. W., 1984, An introduction to linear inverse theory: IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, GE-22, 665-674.
  10. Oldenburg, D. W., and Li, Y., 2005, Inversion for applied geophysics: a tutorial, in Dwain K. Butler, ed., Investigations in geophysics no. 13, pp. 89–150, SEG.
  11. Palmer, D., 1980, The generalized reciprocal method of seismic refraction interpretation: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, 104 pp.
  12. Palmer D. 1981 An introduction to the generalized reciprocal method of seismic refraction interpretation: Geophysics 46 1508 1518 10.1190/1.1441157
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1441157 [Google Scholar]
  13. Palmer, D., 1986, Refraction seismics: the lateral resolution of structure and seismic velocity: Geophysical Press.
  14. Palmer D. 1991 The resolution of narrow low-velocity zones with the generalized reciprocal method: Geophysical Prospecting 39 1031 1060 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.1991.tb00358.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1991.tb00358.x [Google Scholar]
  15. Palmer D. 2001 a Imaging refractors with the convolution section: Geophysics 66 1582 1589 10.1190/1.1487103
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1487103 [Google Scholar]
  16. Palmer D. 2001 b Resolving refractor ambiguities with amplitudes: Geophysics 66 1590 1593 10.1190/1.1487104
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1487104 [Google Scholar]
  17. Palmer D. 2001 c Measurement of rock fabric in shallow refraction seismology: Exploration Geophysics 32 307 314 10.1071/EG01307
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG01307 [Google Scholar]
  18. Palmer, D. 2003, Application of amplitudes in shallow seismic refraction inversion. 16th ASEG Conference and Exhibition, Adelaide (Abstract).
  19. Palmer D. 2006 Refraction traveltime and amplitude corrections for very near-surface inhomogeneities: Geophysical Prospecting 54 589 604 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.2006.00567.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2006.00567.x [Google Scholar]
  20. Palmer, D., 2007, Is it time to re-engineer geotechnical seismic refraction methods? 19th ASEG Conference and Exhibition, Perth (Extended Abstract).
  21. Palmer D. 2008 a Is it time to re-engineer geotechnical seismic refraction methods?: First Break 26 69 77
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Palmer, D., 2008b, Non-Uniqueness in near-surface refraction inversion. In Xu, Y. X., Xia, J. H., eds., Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Wuhan, China. Science Press, Beijing., pp. 42–54.
  23. Palmer D. 2009 a Maximising the lateral resolution of near-surface seismic refraction methods: Exploration Geophysics 40 85 90 Butsuri-Tansa 62 85 90 Mulli-Tamsa 12 85 90 10.1071/EG08119
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG08119 [Google Scholar]
  24. Palmer D. 2009 b Integrating short and long wavelength time and amplitude statics: First Break 27 57 65
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Palmer D. 2010 a Non-uniqueness with refraction inversion – a syncline model study: Geophysical Prospecting 58 203 218 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.2009.00818.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00818.x [Google Scholar]
  26. Palmer D. 2010 b Non-uniqueness with refraction inversion – the Mt Bulga shear zone: Geophysical Prospecting 58 561 575 10.1111/j.1365‑2478.2009.00855.x
    https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.2009.00855.x [Google Scholar]
  27. Palmer D. 2010 c Are refraction attributes more useful than refraction tomography?: First Break 28 43 52
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Palmer, D., 2010d, Non-uniqueness with refraction inversion – a syncline model study: 21st ASEG Conference and Exhibition, Sydney (Extended Abstract).
  29. Palmer D. Nikrouz R. Spyrou A. 2005 Statics corrections for shallow seismic refraction data: Exploration Geophysics 36 7 17 10.1071/EG05007
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG05007 [Google Scholar]
  30. Palmer D. Shadlow J. 2008 Integrating long and short wavelength statics with the generalized reciprocal method and the refraction convolution section: Exploration Geophysics 39 139 147 10.1071/EG08019
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG08019 [Google Scholar]
  31. Schuster G. T. Quintus-Bosz A. 1993 Wavepath eikonal traveltime inversion: theory: Geophysics 58 1314 1323 10.1190/1.1443514
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443514 [Google Scholar]
  32. Stefani J. P. 1995 Turning-ray tomography: Geophysics 60 1917 1929 10.1190/1.1443923
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1443923 [Google Scholar]
  33. Whiteley R. J. 2004 Shallow seismic refraction interpretation with visual interactive ray trace (VIRT) modeling: Exploration Geophysics 35 116 123 10.1071/EG04116
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG04116 [Google Scholar]
  34. Whiteley R. J. Eccleston P. J. 2006 Comparison of shallow seismic refraction interpretation methods for regolith mapping: Exploration Geophysics 37 340 347 10.1071/EG06340
    https://doi.org/10.1071/EG06340 [Google Scholar]
  35. Whiteley, R. J., and Leung, T. M. (undated), Mt Bulga revisited: http://rayfract.com/pub/Mt_Bulga_Revisited.pdf
  36. Zhang J. Toksöz M. N. 1998 Nonlinear refraction traveltime tomography: Geophysics 63 1726 1737 10.1190/1.1444468
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1444468 [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhu X. Sixta D. P. Andstman B. G. 1992 Tomostatics: turning-ray tomography + static corrections: The Leading Edge 11 15 23 10.1190/1.1436864
    https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1436864 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1071/EG09028
Loading
Is visual interactive ray trace an efficacious strategy for refraction inversion?
Exploration Geophysics 41, 260 (2010); https://doi.org/10.1071/EG09028
/content/journals/10.1071/EG09028
/content/journals/10.1071/EG09028
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): GRM, inversion, non-uniqueness, refraction, tomography, VIRT.

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error