1887
Volume 41, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

The building process of any geological map involves linking sparse lithological outcrop information with equally sparse geometrical measurements, all in a single entity which is the preferred interpretation of the field geologist. The actual veracity of this interpretative map is partially dependent upon the frequency and distribution of geological outcrops compounded by the complexity of the local geology. Geophysics is commonly used as a tool to augment the distribution of data points, however it normally does not have sufficient geometrical constraints due to: a) all geophysical inversion models being inherently non-unique; and b) the lack of knowledge of the physical property contrasts associated with specific lithologies. This contribution proposes the combined use of geophysical edge detection routines and ‘three point’ solutions from topographic data as a possible approach to obtaining geological contact geometry information (strike and dip), which can be used in the construction of a preliminary geological model. This derived geological information should first be assessed for its compatibility with the scale of the problem, and any directly observed geological data. Once verified it can be used to help constrain the preferred geological map interpretation being developed by the field geologist. The method models the contacts as planar surfaces. Therefore, it must be ensured that this assumption fits the scale and geometry of the problem. Two examples are shown from folded sequences at the Bathurst Mining Camp, New Brunswick, Canada.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG09032
2010-03-01
2026-01-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Barbosa V. C. F. Silva J. B. C. 2006 Interactive 2D magnetic inversion: A tool for aiding forward modeling and testing geological hypotheses: Geophysics 71 L43 L50 doi:10.1190/1.2258093
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Calcagno P. , Courrioux G. , Guillen A. , Fitzgerald D. J. , and McInerney P. 2006, How 3D implicit geometric modelling helps to understand geology: The 3D-geomodeller methodology: XIth International Congress, Society for Mathematical Geology.
  3. Geological Survey of Canada, 1996, Release of Airborne Geophysical Survey Data: Bathurst, New Brunswick. Open File 1394, 1394.
  4. Galley A. G. , Hannington M. D. , and Jonasson I. R. 2007, Volcanogenic massive sulphide deposits In W. D. Goodfellow (ed.). Mineral Deposits of Canada: A Synthesis of Major Deposit-Types, District Metallogeny, the Evolution of Geological Provinces and Exploration Methods: Geological Association of Canada, Mineral Deposits Division, 141–161.
  5. Holden E.-J. Dentith M. Kovesi P. 2008 Towards the automated analysis of regional aeromagnetic data to identify regions prospective for gold deposits: Computers & Geosciences 34 1505 1513 doi:10.1016/j.cageo.2007.08.007
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hornby P. Boschetti F. Horowitz F. G. 1999 Analysis of potential field data in the wavelet domain: Geophysical Journal International 137 175 196 doi:10.1046/j.1365-246x.1999.00788.x
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Keating P. Thomas M. Kiss F. 2003 Significance of a high-resolution magnetic and electromagnetic survey for exploration and geologic investigations. Bathurst mining camp: Economic Geology Monographs 11 783 798
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Li Y. Oldenburg D. W. 1996 3-D Inversion of magnetic data: Geophysics 61 394 408 doi:10.1190/1.1443968
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Musgrave R. J. Grewar J. Vega M. 2006 Significance of remanence in stawell goldfield aeromagnetic anomalies: Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 53 783 797 doi:10.1080/08120090600827454
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Paterson N. R. Reeves C. V. 1985 Applications of gravity and magnetic surveys: The state-of-the-art in 1985: Geophysics 50 2558 2594 doi:10.1190/1.1441884
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Pilkington M. , and Keating P. 2004, Contact mapping from gridded magnetic data-A comparison: ASEG, 17th Geophysical Conference and Exhibition.
  12. Silverman B. 1986, Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis: Chapman & Hall.
  13. van Staal C. R. Wilson R. A. Rogers N. A. Fyffe L. Langton J. P. McCutcheon S. R. McNicoll V. Ravenurst C. E. 2003 Geology and tectonic history of the bathurst supergroup, Bathurst mining camp, and its relationships to coeval rocks in southwestern New Brunswick and adjacent maine – a synthesis: Economic Geology Monographs 11 37 60
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Williams N. 2008, Geologically-Constrained UBC-GIF Gravity and Magnetic Inversions with Examples from the Agnew-Wiluna Greenstone Belt, Western Australia: University of British Columbia.
/content/journals/10.1071/EG09032
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG09032
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
Keyword(s): Bathurst Mining Camp, potential fields, 3D modelling, topography.

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error