1887
Volume 41, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 0812-3985
  • E-ISSN: 1834-7533

Abstract

The internal structure of a river embankment must be delineated as part of investigations to evaluate its safety. Geophysical methods can be most effective means for that purpose, if they are used together with geotechnical methods such as the cone penetration test (CPT) and drilling. Since the dyke body and subsoil in general consist of material with a wide range of grain size, the properties and stratification of the soil must be accurately estimated to predict the mechanical stability and water infiltration in the river embankment. The strength and water content of the levee soil are also parameters required for such prediction. These parameters are usually estimated from CPT data, drilled core samples and laboratory tests. In this study we attempt to utilise geophysical data to estimate these parameters more effectively for very long river embankments. S-wave velocity and resistivity of the levee soils obtained with geophysical surveys are used to classify the soils. The classification is based on a physical soil model, called the unconsolidated sand model. Using this model, a soil profile along the river embankment is constructed from S-wave velocity and resistivity profiles. The soil profile thus obtained has been verified by geotechnical logs, which proves its usefulness for investigation of a river embankment.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1071/EG09049
2010-03-01
2026-01-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Asch T H Deszcz-Pan M Burton B Ball L Kress W and Vrabel J 2008, Geophysical Characterization of a Levee With DC Resistivity and Electromagnetic Measurements: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP), 21, 739–748.
  2. Avseth P. , Mukerji T. , and Mavko G. 2005, Quantitative seismic interpretation: Cambridge University Press.
  3. Dvorkin J. , Mavko G. , and Mukerji T. 2002, Rock physics reservoir characterization – approaches and methods tutorial: Stanford University.
  4. Groom D. , Yamashita Y. , Konishi C. , and Hayashi K. 2009, Application of capacitively-coupled resistivity method to site investigation: Proceedings of 8th SEGJ International Symposium.
  5. Hashin Z. Shtrikman S. 1963 A variation approach to the elastic behaviour of multiphase materials: Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 11 127 140 doi:10.1016/0022-5096(63)90060-7
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hayashi K. Suzuki H. 2004 CMP cross-correlation analysis of multi-channel surface wave data: Exploration Geophysics 35 7 13 doi:10.1071/EG04007
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Inazaki T. , Hayashi K. , Watanabe F. , Matsuo K. , Tokumaru T. , and Imamura S. 2008, Ground truth verification of an integrated geophysical investigation for the assessment of an earthen levee: Proceedings of the 21st Annual Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environmental Problems (SAGEEP), 21, 731–738.
  8. Marion D. Nur A. Yin H. Han D. 1992 Compressional velocity and porosity in sand-clay mixtures: Geophysics 57 554 563 doi:10.1190/1.1443269
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Mavko G. , Mukerji T. , and Dvorkin J. 2009, The rock physics handbook, second edition: Cambridge University Press.
  10. Niederleithinger E. , Weller A. , Lewis R. , Stötzner U. , Fechner Th. , Lorenz B. , and Nießen J. 2008, Evaluation of geophysical methods for river embankment investigation: Proceedings of 4th International Symposium of Flood Defense.
  11. Shibata T. Mimura M. Shrivastava A. Nobuyama M. 1992 Moisture measurement by neutron moisture cone penetrometer; Design and application: Soil and Foundation 32 58 67
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Yamamoto T. , Kodan E. , Itokawa M. Kyoto University River Embankment Research Consortium 2008, Study on applicability of geophysical methods and instruments for investigation of river embankment by Kinki Technical Office, MLIT, in the state of the art of applications of geophysical methods, SEG Japan (in Japanese).
/content/journals/10.1071/EG09049
Loading
/content/journals/10.1071/EG09049
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Most Cited This Month Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error